Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

Just got dyno tuned today!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 12:17 PM
  #1  
AfireINSIDE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Just got dyno tuned today!

In Michigan a local tuner (Godspeed now known as tuner factory inc) put her on a Dynapack Dyno today and did a re-tune, the results were......... at 19psi on 93 octane we got 344 AWHP at 6850 rpm (gain of 24.6 hp) and 292 ft/lb at 5498 rpm (a gain of 31.9) Mods are in my signature. Graphs below.......
Attached Thumbnails Just got dyno tuned today!-dynotourqe.jpg   Just got dyno tuned today!-dynohp.jpg  

Last edited by AfireINSIDE; Feb 9, 2006 at 11:14 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 01:35 PM
  #2  
tehforbes's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
From: SATX
nice man.

i just bought me an aem ems(for 700 bucks!!!!) and then im gonna get a re-tune.

hopefully put down over 300whp with intake,exhaust, and lower ic pipe.

-Ryan
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 02:53 PM
  #3  
Evol_VIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 279
Likes: 0
From: Naples, FL
What GT30 are you running?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 03:01 PM
  #4  
evocanival's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Middletown N.Y.
nice numbers
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 03:47 PM
  #5  
joeymia's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 2
From: FL
why only 7k? looks like you could have gone to atleast 8k
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 04:07 PM
  #6  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Is this good? The torque is very low, and the HP is about what you'd get on a stock turbo. Is there a reason for only 19psi, or did I miss something? I do know that Dynapacks don't read any lower than Dynojets on average, so it's not a case of a low-reading dyno or anything.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 05:55 PM
  #7  
Takahashi's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
From: Fort Collins, CO
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Is this good? The torque is very low, and the HP is about what you'd get on a stock turbo. Is there a reason for only 19psi, or did I miss something? I do know that Dynapacks don't read any lower than Dynojets on average, so it's not a case of a low-reading dyno or anything.
I agree. I am currently making 330 torque with the most basic bolt ons... and my horsepower does not seem to be quite different either. Maybe shoud've gone with the GT35R?
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 06:55 PM
  #8  
AfireINSIDE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
Well I bought the car with all these mods done, I was thinking myself that the numbers werent that great afterwards............ The tuner stated he wanted to keep boost at 19 psi to be a "safe tune" I run 93 oct so I belive 22 psi is safe right??? What do you guys think pay another tuner????
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 07:45 PM
  #9  
mchuang's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,180
Likes: 1
From: h town
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
Is this good? The torque is very low, and the HP is about what you'd get on a stock turbo. Is there a reason for only 19psi, or did I miss something? I do know that Dynapacks don't read any lower than Dynojets on average, so it's not a case of a low-reading dyno or anything.

Probably because he has no way of tuning the timing properly since emanage is a piggy back. He cant really take full advantage of the turbo. Also those turbos produce torque differently from stock turbos. I had a 60-1 garrett on my SI pushing 9psi hp was 341 and 218 torque. Friend had a type r same compression bottom end same motor size but had a greddy turbo kit with 18g. He was on 11psi the torque was 279 and his hp was 293.
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 10:59 PM
  #10  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by AfireINSIDE
Well I bought the car with all these mods done, I was thinking myself that the numbers werent that great afterwards............ The tuner stated he wanted to keep boost at 19 psi to be a "safe tune" I run 93 oct so I belive 22 psi is safe right??? What do you guys think pay another tuner????
Your questions here tell me you have no business with an Evo that has a big turbo like that.

Running 19psi on an upgraded turbo is an absolute crime. I don't think the tuner has any clue what he's talking about. Yes, you can run 22psi on 93oct with the stock turbo, but I have no idea what that turbo should be running. It's bigger than stock, so it should be running a good bit more boost than stock, too, otherwise it's being wasted.

Find some guys on here who have that turbo and pick their brains...
Reply
Old Feb 7, 2006 | 11:00 PM
  #11  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by mchuang
Probably because he has no way of tuning the timing properly since emanage is a piggy back. He cant really take full advantage of the turbo. Also those turbos produce torque differently from stock turbos. I had a 60-1 garrett on my SI pushing 9psi hp was 341 and 218 torque. Friend had a type r same compression bottom end same motor size but had a greddy turbo kit with 18g. He was on 11psi the torque was 279 and his hp was 293.
I hear what you're saying, but those are completely different cars. It shouldn't be like this on an Evo at this power level. I'm pretty sure the lack of torque is due to the lack of boost - that's where we get our torque, and his boost is lower than stock.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 05:57 AM
  #12  
AfireINSIDE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
I am just telling you what he said about being safe, I myself thought 19 psi was not good, he suggested of course more parts to be able to get the higher psi, intake manifold and intercooler. And possibly a AEM engine management to get the full benefit and tuneability.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 06:47 PM
  #13  
AfireINSIDE's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 346
Likes: 1
From: Michigan
So about adjusting boost with my emanage is as simple as putting it to 22 psi or so? or do i need to adjust A/F?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 09:59 PM
  #14  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by AfireINSIDE
So about adjusting boost with my emanage is as simple as putting it to 22 psi or so? or do i need to adjust A/F?
I have no clue. I don't know why that combo of mods was put on there. You should just have an MBC and a flash or something. Yeah, AEM EMS will work great, but good gracious, that's a lot of money and is very complicated. I'm sure you could get rid of that E-manage, add a Forge UNOS MBC, and get a custom Dynoflash then make a ton more power than you are now without spending much money at all.

Adding an intake manifold and FMIC have nothing to do with allowing you to run more than 19psi. What's wrong with those guys?
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #15  
j8's Avatar
j8
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 470
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio
Originally Posted by Warrtalon
I have no clue. I don't know why that combo of mods was put on there. You should just have an MBC and a flash or something. Yeah, AEM EMS will work great, but good gracious, that's a lot of money and is very complicated. I'm sure you could get rid of that E-manage, add a Forge UNOS MBC, and get a custom Dynoflash then make a ton more power than you are now without spending much money at all.

Adding an intake manifold and FMIC have nothing to do with allowing you to run more than 19psi. What's wrong with those guys?
I agree, sounds like the tuner is trying to take you for a ride. You should be more than safe to run that turbo at 22-21 psi on 93 octane with a proper tune. I would also ditch the e-manage and go with a flash. Just my 2 cents.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 PM.