Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

Opening tunes up for discussion...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 9, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #1  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Opening tunes up for discussion...

Figured it would be nice to maybe start some discussions about peoples current tunes.

Been messing around with fine tuning my tune. Here is where I am currently at.

This is a pretty aggressive (for me) tune on 91 octane. One thing I have been noticing is that the EVO with cams perfers to be slightly richer. This current tune is running more timing then I usually like to. I usually aim for about 18 degrees on 91 octane, this is running about 20-21 degrees at the rev limiter, I am messing around with pushing the limits. :wink:

Anyway, screenshot and the actual log is below. Discuss!



Log:
http://tinyurl.com/paq92
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 02:58 AM
  #2  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
ok can i ask a ton of uneducated questions...

first... this is like safc style subtractive fuel mapping right? so you have 720s adn you're takin' away fuel everywhere. coo... i can live with that.

so are you also subtracting the timing that the ecu is giving you? and where are the base timing values then? are you able to tabulate them with the ecu+ correction values? cuz i see the hightlight box gives you the real timing value! this is all very nice... i like!!!!
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #3  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by trinydex
ok can i ask a ton of uneducated questions...

first... this is like safc style subtractive fuel mapping right? so you have 720s adn you're takin' away fuel everywhere. coo... i can live with that.

so are you also subtracting the timing that the ecu is giving you? and where are the base timing values then? are you able to tabulate them with the ecu+ correction values? cuz i see the hightlight box gives you the real timing value! this is all very nice... i like!!!!
yes, fuel is like SAFC.

Since I am running 720cc, and leaning it out so much, you are right, it gives crazy timing advance. Too much for 91 octane.

If you look at my timing settings, I am taking timing out in high and WOT cells to compensate. The engine monitor top left is showing what the actual timing is where my cursor is in the log, so this pull topped out at 21 degrees advance. Before I took timing out I was hitting almost 25 degrees advance up top, which 91 octane didn't like so much.

Anymore questions, let me know, I want to try and open up more discussion in here and the ECU+ boards.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 01:54 PM
  #4  
trinydex's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,072
Likes: 8
From: not here
yeah this is great... perfect for newbs like me. the pictures are the most helpful.
Reply
Old Mar 10, 2006 | 08:25 PM
  #5  
Creamo3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Agreed, this is a good place to discuss tuning w/ the ECU+. I am about to buy mine and like to see different techniques people are using when tuning. How long did it take to develop a base map for your car? I will be tuning on top of a flash already, I just got sick of paying to get reflashed when I have the ability to do it myself. The ECU+ looks great and the features are still being developed which I like even more. Tom seems to be a car nut just like us and actually listens to customers feedback when developing which is a huge plus in my book
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 09:13 AM
  #6  
Creamo3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by razorlab
Figured it would be nice to maybe start some discussions about peoples current tunes.

Been messing around with fine tuning my tune. Here is where I am currently at.

This is a pretty aggressive (for me) tune on 91 octane. One thing I have been noticing is that the EVO with cams perfers to be slightly richer. This current tune is running more timing then I usually like to. I usually aim for about 18 degrees on 91 octane, this is running about 20-21 degrees at the rev limiter, I am messing around with pushing the limits. :wink:

Anyway, screenshot and the actual log is below. Discuss!



Log:
http://tinyurl.com/paq92
Just took a look at your log and was wondering if your A/F is safe being around 12.0 on 91 octane. Looks to be giving a lot of timing advance that you are obviously removing. Knock looks good as well, I am just used to hearing how everyone tunes really conservative on 91 swill. I am in the process of logging my current dynoflash and will be smoothing out the fuel curve and adding more timing down low as well. Just wondering about the air/fuel tough.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #7  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by Creamo3
Just took a look at your log and was wondering if your A/F is safe being around 12.0 on 91 octane. Looks to be giving a lot of timing advance that you are obviously removing. Knock looks good as well, I am just used to hearing how everyone tunes really conservative on 91 swill. I am in the process of logging my current dynoflash and will be smoothing out the fuel curve and adding more timing down low as well. Just wondering about the air/fuel tough.
Be sure to set the ECU+ software to Zeitronix wideband when viewing my logs. That way the AFR will display correctly. I am not running 12.0 AFR anywhere. 11.2 AFR up top.

I have to remove timing because I have 720cc injectors which makes me take out alot of fuel which advances my timing. 91 octane doesn't like very high timing.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 11:36 AM
  #8  
Creamo3's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (48)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,078
Likes: 2
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by razorlab
Be sure to set the ECU+ software to Zeitronix wideband when viewing my logs. That way the AFR will display correctly. I am not running 12.0 AFR anywhere. 11.2 AFR up top.

I have to remove timing because I have 720cc injectors which makes me take out alot of fuel which advances my timing. 91 octane doesn't like very high timing.
Gothcha, that makes much more sense Switched it from my AEM and looks good
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 11:49 AM
  #9  
Ev0ikon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,677
Likes: 11
From: 3rd Rock {from = sun}
That AFR looks about perfect. Agree on Big cams like to be richer, too. It's interesting that my fuel table looks almost like yours even though I run 780cc. I also run methanol so I can keep a lot of advanced sparks.
Good Stuff!
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2006 | 05:20 PM
  #10  
modvp's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 847
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by razorlab
yes, fuel is like SAFC.

Since I am running 720cc, and leaning it out so much, you are right, it gives crazy timing advance. Too much for 91 octane.

If you look at my timing settings, I am taking timing out in high and WOT cells to compensate. The engine monitor top left is showing what the actual timing is where my cursor is in the log, so this pull topped out at 21 degrees advance. Before I took timing out I was hitting almost 25 degrees advance up top, which 91 octane didn't like so much.

Anymore questions, let me know, I want to try and open up more discussion in here and the ECU+ boards.
Say you were running stock injectors, how much timing (and fuel) would you have had to remove on top?
Reply
Old Apr 4, 2006 | 10:52 AM
  #11  
RazorLab's Avatar
Thread Starter
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by modvp
Say you were running stock injectors, how much timing (and fuel) would you have had to remove on top?
Depends on the cars and the mods of course, I have seen and tuned from -10 to -14 fuel and about -2 timing up top on 91 octane.
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2006 | 12:24 PM
  #12  
fsugatorbait's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,338
Likes: 0
From: CT
I love this stuff. Looks like a very good conservative tune. I cant wait till I can pull the trigger for ECU+.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2006 | 06:35 AM
  #13  
4TUN8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,458
Likes: 1
Best ECU+ tune I've ever seen. I thought I was pretty good at this, but damn.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2006 | 12:15 AM
  #14  
GinuwineEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: 818
:::Also Posted on the ECU+ Forums - Figured I'd share here too!:::

2 logs obtained tonight.
One till around 7000rpm

And another full one till redline.

Mods btw:
04 Evo 8 9.8t Housing Stock Turbo
3inch TBE w/ RRE Rally Cat
Hallman RX Pro w/ In cabin adjuster set for 1.5 Spike to 1.4 taper
720cc Greddy Denso Injectors
Walbro 255lph Fuel Pump
Stock Airbox w/ K&N Drop-In
HKS 280/280 Cams
Fidanza Cam Gears set to -3/-3

I weight 170lbs
Tires are 255/40/17

Used an edited version of Bryan/EarlyApex/RazorLab's Fuel/Timing Settings as a base map- and a ton of his advice and guidance.
EGT's topped out @ 1549f



Am I doing this stuff right? Comments/Suggestions? I'm a n00b so I dont know if I should/can lean it out some more ~ And if so - where do I begin? From the top ? From the bottom? Where timing is being pulled? I dont really see high knock voltage, and I do see a dip or 2 in timing. ..

I'm open to all discussion! RazorLab/Early Apex has been such a great help so I'd just like to give him a big thanks for helping me getting started on my tune!

http://beta.yousendit.com/transfer.p...39BFFB3EBC9D86
1st Run - stopped @ 7000 RPM

http://beta.yousendit.com/transfer.p...8E124D7147D73E
Good 3rd Gear Run Log
Reply
Old May 3, 2006 | 09:09 AM
  #15  
GinuwineEvo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 509
Likes: 0
From: 818
According to this, if I put 0% Tranny loss I'm only making - 227.5Max hp & 242.4 tq - does that sound right? =X
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:54 PM.