Messing with timing...
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Messing with timing...
Today I did some tuning changes to my timing map and some very small changes to my fueling map to compensate.
I centered my efforts today around 3000-5000 rpm
Look at the difference adding a little bit of timing in that area does! At 4300rpm, I gained 19wtq and 16whp. I was really impressed with the curve gain from 3500 to 5200rpm.
All of this was with not much added knock voltage so still a safe tune.
Next time I will be tweaking 5200rpm on since I am still running some lower timing there.
Here is the dyno chart and the 2 maps before and after so you can see the changes I did.

before map:

after map:
I centered my efforts today around 3000-5000 rpm
Look at the difference adding a little bit of timing in that area does! At 4300rpm, I gained 19wtq and 16whp. I was really impressed with the curve gain from 3500 to 5200rpm.
All of this was with not much added knock voltage so still a safe tune.
Next time I will be tweaking 5200rpm on since I am still running some lower timing there.
Here is the dyno chart and the 2 maps before and after so you can see the changes I did.

before map:

after map:
Originally Posted by GinuwineEvo8
Nice gains! I understand your WOT and HIGH maps ... Any general tips for tuning the low and med maps? I have no idea where to start : P
thats cause your from the incompetent 818 dwarf
What kind of boost levels as well? graph is pretty flat...you still have room to increase a couple pounds? very linear just seems it could be making more at the top end. beautiful torque!
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by KevOVIII
Post screenies of the timing curve and knock voltage. 

I'll also be logging the next couple days doing a bunch of different types of driving to see how these current settings look. If they don't look so hot , I will revert or bring them down a bit. 
and ECU+ log:
http://tinyurl.com/jlvvm
Last edited by razorlab; Apr 15, 2006 at 12:06 AM.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by BaseModelEvo
Yes very interested. our cars are not a fan of much timing. Nice gains, nice graph.
Originally Posted by BaseModelEvo
What kind of boost levels as well? graph is pretty flat...you still have room to increase a couple pounds? very linear just seems it could be making more at the top end. beautiful torque!
Hahaha, right on, keep me updated if you don't mind. Admin@garagedonline.com I'll have my dyno next year, in the meantime I'm working with a 4wd hub splined dyna-pak and attempting to teach myself all I can working with EcuTech Software and so far so good. Mitsu has a GREAT failsafe for highboost (don't ask!). It really makes it hard to hurt the car unless you do something plain stupid. Congrats again and thanks for the great info.
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
alrighty, did some changes to the tune today. Also swapped the stock OEM drop-in filter with a K&N drop-in filter.
I had to take out 1 degree of timing from 4000 rpm to 5500 rpm to smooth out the knock voltage a bit. I also put back in some fuel from 2750 to 6000 rpm.
This seemed to smooth everything out pretty well. These changes made me gain a bit in the midrange over yesterdays tuning and also a bit up top.
Then I pulled over and swapped out the filters. Did three runs with the K&N in and tweaked it a tad (needed more fuel). There is still some tuning to do with the new filter in, it seems to want to knock a little at 5000 rpm.
Notice on the curves below that I gained up top with the K&N filter but lost a bit of torque and HP in the mid and lows. I will have to tune and see if I can get those areas back. The knock at 5k might have a bit to do with it as as well.

A really interesting comparison chart showing almost no change at all in MAF input with the K&N filter:

A screen shot of the last pull with K&N log:

and the ECU+ log here:
http://tinyurl.com/pzev4
I had to take out 1 degree of timing from 4000 rpm to 5500 rpm to smooth out the knock voltage a bit. I also put back in some fuel from 2750 to 6000 rpm.
This seemed to smooth everything out pretty well. These changes made me gain a bit in the midrange over yesterdays tuning and also a bit up top.
Then I pulled over and swapped out the filters. Did three runs with the K&N in and tweaked it a tad (needed more fuel). There is still some tuning to do with the new filter in, it seems to want to knock a little at 5000 rpm.
Notice on the curves below that I gained up top with the K&N filter but lost a bit of torque and HP in the mid and lows. I will have to tune and see if I can get those areas back. The knock at 5k might have a bit to do with it as as well.

A really interesting comparison chart showing almost no change at all in MAF input with the K&N filter:

A screen shot of the last pull with K&N log:

and the ECU+ log here:
http://tinyurl.com/pzev4
Originally Posted by razorlab
alrighty, did some changes to the tune today. Also swapped the stock OEM drop-in filter with a K&N drop-in filter.
I had to take out 1 degree of timing from 4000 rpm to 5500 rpm to smooth out the knock voltage a bit. I also put back in some fuel from 2750 to 6000 rpm.
This seemed to smooth everything out pretty well. These changes made me gain a bit in the midrange over yesterdays tuning and also a bit up top.
Then I pulled over and swapped out the filters. Did three runs with the K&N in and tweaked it a tad (needed more fuel). There is still some tuning to do with the new filter in, it seems to want to knock a little at 5000 rpm.
Notice on the curves below that I gained up top with the K&N filter but lost a bit of torque and HP in the mid and lows. I will have to tune and see if I can get those areas back. The knock at 5k might have a bit to do with it as as well.

A really interesting comparison chart showing almost no change at all in MAF input with the K&N filter:

A screen shot of the last pull with K&N log:

and the ECU+ log here:
http://tinyurl.com/pzev4
I had to take out 1 degree of timing from 4000 rpm to 5500 rpm to smooth out the knock voltage a bit. I also put back in some fuel from 2750 to 6000 rpm.
This seemed to smooth everything out pretty well. These changes made me gain a bit in the midrange over yesterdays tuning and also a bit up top.
Then I pulled over and swapped out the filters. Did three runs with the K&N in and tweaked it a tad (needed more fuel). There is still some tuning to do with the new filter in, it seems to want to knock a little at 5000 rpm.
Notice on the curves below that I gained up top with the K&N filter but lost a bit of torque and HP in the mid and lows. I will have to tune and see if I can get those areas back. The knock at 5k might have a bit to do with it as as well.

A really interesting comparison chart showing almost no change at all in MAF input with the K&N filter:

A screen shot of the last pull with K&N log:

and the ECU+ log here:
http://tinyurl.com/pzev4
I guess that I am being overly conservative with my tuning. If I see any spikes like that in my knock log, I am trying to eliminate the the spikes. I guess this lends itself to the question, "what level should be considered knock?". I have always just assumed that a suden spike from the norm to be knock.....but it seems you are ignoring that as knock. Will a "real knock" spike higher than 2.50 volts?
HiVoltEVO8
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by HiVoltEVO8
I guess that I am being overly conservative with my tuning. If I see any spikes like that in my knock log, I am trying to eliminate the the spikes. I guess this lends itself to the question, "what level should be considered knock?". I have always just assumed that a suden spike from the norm to be knock.....but it seems you are ignoring that as knock. Will a "real knock" spike higher than 2.50 volts?
HiVoltEVO8
HiVoltEVO8
I consider any knock spike that pulls timing a knock event worth looking at.
If you look at that log, that knock spike at 6.20 time pulls some timing, and you can tell by how long it takes to die down. I consider that a knock event worth taking care of and I pointed that out above.
Keep in mind, I hadn't really messed with adding timing in until a couple days ago. So I am kinda pushing and pulling these tunes, these are not final tunes.
I have however been taking time out up top for sometime on my tunes with 91 octane.
Originally Posted by razorlab
Today I did some tuning changes to my timing map and some very small changes to my fueling map to compensate.
I centered my efforts today around 3000-5000 rpm
Look at the difference adding a little bit of timing in that area does! At 4300rpm, I gained 19wtq and 16whp. I was really impressed with the curve gain from 3500 to 5200rpm.
I centered my efforts today around 3000-5000 rpm
Look at the difference adding a little bit of timing in that area does! At 4300rpm, I gained 19wtq and 16whp. I was really impressed with the curve gain from 3500 to 5200rpm.
Tom
Thread Starter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,094
Likes: 1,092
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by tlcoll1
Bryan's the man when it comes to ECU+ tuning!
Tom
Tom
http://www.yourethemannowdog.com/







Cant even do your own fluid changes