Notices
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum Discuss general EMS tuning concepts that do not pertain to a specfic brand or product.

any drawback on ECU+

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 06:19 AM
  #1  
vroomevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
any drawback on ECU+

Hello all.
I am looking into engine management, initially EMS vs ECUFlash vs another dynotunning? but, ECU+ seems like it can do almost everything!

what are the things that ECU+ can't do like EMS?

what's the real catch of ECU+?

is P0300 code the problem with ECU+?

please let me know since i am newbie to ECU+.

happy holiday everyone!

Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 12:10 PM
  #2  
burgers22's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 953
Likes: 2
From: Oxfordshire
Hi

I bought ECU+ before the advent of ECUflash, as I though that it was the best method for the self tuner. It can manipulate both fuel and ignition, it can intergrate boost, 02 and EGT logging. Has the ability to scale injectors run different MAFs and do some niffty things with idle.

For me though ECU+'s big big ace, is the logging software. Its is simply great to use, the way you can compare all the data, add multipul pulls together and the dyno function is really nice as well.

I would say that it is a great tuning device, even if you could only log with it, it would still be well worth the investment.

MB
Reply
Old Nov 26, 2006 | 02:13 PM
  #3  
zzombae's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
I'm interested in, too~!
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 06:28 AM
  #4  
vroomevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
anyone? alot of read but not many response.
Thanks.

wassup zzombae!!!
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 06:31 AM
  #5  
Ackerson's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
It's a piggyback so it's somewhat limited to what it can do. As time progresses flashes are going to get more and more powerful and have much wider range of functions. Having an integrated datalogger is one a really nice feature, it makes tuning go a lot faster.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 06:41 AM
  #6  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
I agree with the logging and other great features..

1) Logging is second to none, Boost, AFR, EGT, unclipped MAF, etc..
2) Works BEST in conjunction with a reflash, however its great for testing new settings and adjustments without repeatedly reflashing trial and error..
3) OBD-II Diagnostics built in, you can check and reset CEL codes, etc. (MUT in the future?)
4) BUILT IN MAF TRANSLATOR!!! As of now, the ECU only handles the stock mitsubishi MAF
5) MAF Clamping at idle to help with poor airflow through the MAF at idle with cams or other low vacuum conditions.

Combine any two of those things and you have a value, look at them all, and you can undersstand why its worth the money.

The ECU+ is a piggyback, and like any piggyback (with the exception of the UTEC) it is limited by the ECU's programming for RPM, Fuel cut, etc.. This is why it works best in conjunction with a reflash. The difference is when you have both the ECU+ and Reflash capabilities, you have logging, diagnostics, and tuning abilities that are unmatched.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 06:43 AM
  #7  
Ackerson's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
I'm kind of curious why more people don't use Dsmlink in their Evo's. It's just a small amount of rewiring, or getting a conversion harness made. Dsmlink is probably one of the most powerful tuning options out there short of a standalone and it's pretty cheap.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 06:52 AM
  #8  
BADEVO's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,440
Likes: 0
From: Summerville SC
Originally Posted by Ackerson
I'm kind of curious why more people don't use Dsmlink in their Evo's. It's just a small amount of rewiring, or getting a conversion harness made. Dsmlink is probably one of the most powerful tuning options out there short of a standalone and it's pretty cheap.

Most people probably dont know you can.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 06:55 AM
  #9  
Ackerson's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by BADEVO
Most people probably dont know you can.
Yeah you're probably right.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 07:02 AM
  #10  
MalibuJack's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 10,572
Likes: 14
From: Royse City, TX
Originally Posted by Ackerson
I'm kind of curious why more people don't use Dsmlink in their Evo's. It's just a small amount of rewiring, or getting a conversion harness made. Dsmlink is probably one of the most powerful tuning options out there short of a standalone and it's pretty cheap.
I'd actually really like to try it.. But its not a "Supported use" for the product.. I think the issue is similar to other standalone systems..

This is Not really an appropriate place to discuss the DSMLink though.. Can you post a new thread in the general engine management forum and I'll post my thoughts there.

DSMlink's advantage is definitely that it has OBD-II though..
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 02:02 PM
  #11  
vroomevo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 367
Likes: 1
From: Tucson, AZ
Thank you gusy, MJ and AK.
I am very newbie to tunning and there are so many out there, can't decide. almost wanted to buy EMS, but...rethinking again.

I think a couple(? maybe alot more) of people both uses ECU+ and ECUFlash.
i think i will go without that route.
Reply
Old Nov 27, 2006 | 05:41 PM
  #12  
tlcoll1's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 352
Likes: 1
From: Odenton, MD
Originally Posted by Ackerson
I'm kind of curious why more people don't use Dsmlink in their Evo's. It's just a small amount of rewiring, or getting a conversion harness made. Dsmlink is probably one of the most powerful tuning options out there short of a standalone and it's pretty cheap.
Keep in mind that when you use the 'link, you're switching out the stock EVO ECU for a DSM ECU that's: a) not designed for your shiny new $30k car, and b) missing about 10 years of design improvements. Several of the EVO sensors are different than the ones on the DSM - honestly I don't know why the 'link even works on the EVO without modifications.

(Note that I have nothing at all against the 'link, but it seems strange that people want to take something not designed for the EVOs and make it work.)

Tom
Reply
Old Nov 28, 2006 | 02:19 PM
  #13  
GVO_VIII's Avatar
Newbie
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
I'm also a newbie when it comes to tuning and the advice I find on the forums are very helpful. I love tom collins for his awesome work and great support! The logging features making tuning a whole lot easier than just taking my car to some half-assed tuner who's just trying to push me out of their shop. I've had my ecu+ for 6 months and honestly I've had the P0300 probably twice, which in my regards is not so bad. After my first month of owning it, I noticed my car ran much better and my gas mileage improved. My friend also noticed it and he sold his exede and also purchased an ECU+. Now, there's three evos I know of that use tom's piggyback. Hey Tom, If you're ever in the Los Angeles Area, just PM me or post on the forums; We'll take care of you!
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 04:37 PM
  #14  
zzombae's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Tucson, AZ
Is ECU+ just a datalogging device? or can it also tune your ecu such as Boost, A/F ratio..
Reply
Old Nov 29, 2006 | 04:47 PM
  #15  
Profoxcg's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 538
Likes: 0
From: SoFla
Im confused with the reflash part? - does that mean my stock ECU needs to be reflashed to be able to use ECU+ ?

In addition can I hook up my laptop to it to "street" tune the car?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:09 PM.