Notices
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech Discuss forced induction related specs and upgrades for custom aftermarket setups.

auto or sitck shift (turbo) lancer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 19, 2007 | 05:53 PM
  #1  
zcool1986's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
From: moved to the 619 area!
auto or sitck shift (turbo) lancer?

which is more quicker? im sure the automatic trannys heat up much quicker too. people always say with an auto you never loose boost but why is the manual still quicker than the automatic turbo? i have also heard n/a autos are big downfall but on turbo their completely different.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #2  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Firstly it's just "quicker" not "more quicker". Secondly, manuals are generally faster because there is less parasitic loss from the transmission but autos don't lose boost when they shift. A good manual driver should be able to beat a comparably modded auto.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #3  
kungfugirl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Socal~ The Valley (818) <3
i lose boost when i shift
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 09:58 PM
  #4  
Chicas's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Tx
Automatic is better for drag racing, manual is better for track racing. Or so I think.
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 10:02 PM
  #5  
Tor's Avatar
Tor
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 53
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Chicas
Automatic is better for drag racing, manual is better for track racing. Or so I think.
I would have to second that, it is extremely hard to drag race manual compared to automatic.
You can't beat manual in road race or any driving that requires turning and good engine control.
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 08:01 AM
  #6  
SLVROZ_03's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
^I third that! Nothing like loosing a half or whole second by missing a shift... but autos on the road course just plan suck! My first auto-x, I had to go into it telling myself I gotta smash the gas a half/whole second early on corner exits just keep pace. But after 2 yrs of driving, it's not something that you can change with a flip of a switch...

But to answer the original question, manual Lancer will. And you can always get a tranny cooler too if that's something you're worried about!
Reply
Old May 21, 2007 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
KillahB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
Have you guys ever raced a modded auto car at the track?

Trust me on this one, unless you running a straight Powerglide or something, the average auto tranny is a dog at the track. Sure you dont have to change, but the small thing of shifting ideally instead of waiting for the auto to shift makes a big difference. I see comparable autos and manuals running differences of 0.5 seconds and greater!

Auto works wonders yes, but unless it is a straight race car, manual for either road or track, in my opinion at least.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 08:13 AM
  #8  
ThunderOZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,897
Likes: 1
From: Newport News, Virginia
Also the manual has that one extra gear giving a better gear ratio. The auto lancer would be a lot quicker if it was a 5spd auto imho
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 08:22 AM
  #9  
crypto's Avatar
Former Vendor
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 3,429
Likes: 1
From: Fort Myers, Florida
it'd be nice if someone made a **** kit for the automatics. Or if Level 10 would answer my emails. lol
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 12:02 PM
  #10  
SLVROZ_03's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Oh, one thing we forgot... the autos naturally loses more power due to parastic loss through the tranny. So two Lancers, both with the same exact kit and parts, the auto will be slower...period.
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 03:52 PM
  #11  
kungfugirl's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,457
Likes: 0
From: Socal~ The Valley (818) <3
the lancer ith auto will likely lose close to 22-25%
Reply
Old Jun 26, 2007 | 11:20 PM
  #12  
crazy4ozs's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
From: Decatur IL
i think its exactly 23%...i THINK
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
xXevo8RavenXx
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
1
Jun 18, 2016 01:50 PM
socomplete
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
2
May 29, 2007 11:44 AM
speedyt345
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
18
Apr 16, 2007 05:04 PM
manny_fresh
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
6
Mar 23, 2007 01:17 PM
Arithmetic
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
30
Jul 17, 2004 08:17 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:02 AM.