Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

New Fuel part for the Lancer.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 08:19 AM
  #16  
HobieKopek's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
20 Year Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,701
Likes: 0
From: Long Island
There's really no need unless you're running a turbo setup. It's to help increase fuel flow so that your car doesn't run lean.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 08:22 AM
  #17  
Link286XT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: CA
its part # 25-300

compare that number with the ones listed on AEM website.
it also fits several other honduhs as well.

the only modification was i had to buy a foot of fuel injection hose and a foot of vacuum hose both cost me $1.38


Link
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 08:24 AM
  #18  
uranium9v's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,509
Likes: 0
From: Somerset, KY
wonder if their fuel rail is simmilar too??? btw 25-300 IS the part number. found one for 160 so far...still looking
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 08:27 AM
  #19  
zlancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,425
Likes: 2
From: Jerzey
i believe injector spacing is different from our 4G94 and any of the B series honda motors. 90% sure
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 08:36 AM
  #20  
Link286XT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: CA
lol i took a look at the fuel rail, it will not fit

i only got it for a special deal cuz the shop wanted to make room for more parts that were more popular and that they could sell, like honda hubcaps and rear cleal lights, lol

Link
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 11:19 AM
  #21  
bahamut's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
From: TB, FL
As for the FPR, the 2g eclipse version just as good since it fits on the 4g93 (pretty sure Mitsu did a parts sharing program betweenall or most of their models). Besides, there is really no reason for mitsu to change the design of the fuel on their 4 cyl.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 11:28 AM
  #22  
DaTenshi's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: CT
Adventon has them for $145
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 01:10 PM
  #23  
hardcoretuner's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
why should i get one of these, somone convince me lol
what exactly do they do for people who don't have a turbo or forced induction of any kind? nothing i thought but correct me if i am wrong.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2002 | 05:02 PM
  #24  
Mitsiman's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 697
Likes: 1
From: Perth, Western Australia
RPW has rising rate regulators for the lancer 2.0 which uses an adapter that bolts directly ontot he fuel rail as per origonal and then goes to an externaly mounted regulator. For pricing as always contact vision imports.

These are good but not for really raising the pressure from teh standard 38 psi (Although you can if your car needs more fuel) but because we use a rising rate unit it has afaster response rate of 1.7 : 1 instead of the standard mitsubishi 1 : 1 and as such it removes flat spots on acceleration as the fuel pressure rises faster to the injectors hence smoother acceleration.

Best of all if you do go turbo later this is a rising boost related unit as well.

David Thomas
www.rpw.com.au
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 01:00 PM
  #25  
david02's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
From: Ohio
i thought i saw rpw's for 250.00
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 02:43 PM
  #26  
YellowOZ03's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: Las Vegas
so for someone who is na and plans to stay na for a while is it really worth it?
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2002 | 04:32 PM
  #27  
rhyzin's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,827
Likes: 0
From: From SLO to San Jose
yeah, i'd like to know that too... if no carb legal header comes out soon, i need something else to buy. hehe

oh yeah, does raising fuel pressure at the fpr decrease the injector duty cycle?

Last edited by rhyzin; Dec 21, 2002 at 04:47 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2002 | 12:32 AM
  #28  
pjal84's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,722
Likes: 0
From: Up to 80 miles north of Gilroy
Originally posted by YellowOZ03
so for someone who is na and plans to stay na for a while is it really worth it?
Only with mods that require more fuel. Wish I could answer rhyzin's question...been a while since I've been stumped.
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2002 | 08:52 AM
  #29  
Link286XT's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: CA
i had it put on while my car was still na, the cars throttle seemed more responsive, and when your cruising at 70, theres almost no lag when you want to accelerate. i also noticed a slight torque increase (i have 18's so i notice hehe) hope that answered some q's

Link
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JRR
Lancer General
266
Jan 10, 2024 01:55 AM
Arfox
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
4
Aug 23, 2017 12:00 AM
WVwhtRalli
Evo X Tires / Wheels / Brakes / Suspension
0
Apr 20, 2016 01:21 PM
steven121
Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
972
Nov 21, 2014 02:45 PM
GTS08
Lancer Aftermarket Forced Induction Tech
13
Mar 12, 2011 01:26 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:25 AM.