Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

9.75:1 octane needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 05:17 AM
  #16  
gregivq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Alchemist
But this dude isn't talking about FI.... he hasn't said turbo even once.

As for whose pistons are best- I'll be going RPW 10.5:1 I would go 11.5:1 but I don't want that much of a headache.

I'm not an expert on RPW. But I have researched the bulk of their NA catalog. I know that hypereuctectic pistons are more than enough for NA. Notice that when the discussion of hyper vs. forged comes up, the next thing that is said is "forged handle boost better". So there's really no need to discuss forged if we're talking NA.

I'm not interested in a fight. I came off too harsh above mostly in response to what I've seen as more blind RRM favoritism. Maybe I'm wrong, if so I apologize.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2005 | 08:40 AM
  #17  
03RallyLancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,595
Likes: 0
From: Redneck KY
also i believe they are cheaper...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nj1266
ECU Flash
875
Jan 25, 2026 01:43 AM
PIE-R
Evo X Engine Management / Tuning Forums
6
Dec 21, 2019 08:14 PM
monsta
ECU Flash
12
Jun 23, 2016 01:11 PM
EvolutionRacing
Evo General
11
Jan 18, 2016 09:55 AM
daechul2da
EvoM New Member / FAQs / EvoM Rules
20
Mar 12, 2007 07:17 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:13 PM.