Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!
View Poll Results: What octane do you pour?
87
11
37.93%
89
6
20.69%
93
13
44.83%
Other...yeah thats right other
3
10.34%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll

what octane gasoline?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 26, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #1  
johnd651's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: NY
what octane gasoline?

so ive been wondering... i got a stock 03 lancer oz and ive been pouring in the different gas octanes...tryin to see what works best

anyone know which octane is preferred and what works best and why to pour it...

i mean other then the $$$...
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #2  
iufan4lifeul's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
I use 93... Don't need too, but it SEEMS a little faster/smoother running it.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 11:41 AM
  #3  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Use the lowest possible (in this case 87). Putting in higher octane is useless, if the car isn't programmed to use it you're just wasting money and potentially harming the car in terms of deposits and cat damage.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 01:08 PM
  #4  
Mirage2.0's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 797
Likes: 0
From: New York
High compression. 93 baby.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 07:45 PM
  #5  
johnd651's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: NY
wait...so regular engine...u recommend 87?!?!

another thing...i poured 89 a couple of times....

and now my engine seems like its skipping or something...even though its not could that be y?

Last edited by johnd651; May 27, 2007 at 07:50 PM.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 07:51 PM
  #6  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Yes.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 08:26 PM
  #7  
iufan4lifeul's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
there really shouldn't be anything wrong with running higher octane than needed... As long as you don't run lower than needed you should be fine.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 08:29 PM
  #8  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
As I said earlier running higher octane than needed can actually damage the car as well it simply being a massive waste of money. The car was tuned to run 87 octane, why put in anything else?
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 08:33 PM
  #9  
KillahB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
I used to run 93 octane because my logic was that nothing but the best for my baby. Well, on 93 I ran a 15.5 and 15.7 bone stock. Because of rising gas prices, I switched to 87. Not only did I get the same or better gas mileage (now getting about 26 - 28 mpg versus the 24 - 26 mpg before, but my commute has changed) but my 1/4 mile times are virtually the same. No power increase or decrease, no timing skip no nothing.

So running 93 octane is a waste of time and money unless you are using some form of forced induction or running high compression pistons.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 08:35 PM
  #10  
iufan4lifeul's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 560
Likes: 0
all octane is, is plain and simply the gasolines resistance to knocking. The higher you run the less chance of pre detonation. I know with my SAFC-Neo they recommend running higher octane for running leaner AFR's. That is why I run 93 octane due to me running 12.8-13.2 AFR. I could probably get by with mid-grade but I play it safe.
Reply
Old May 27, 2007 | 08:37 PM
  #11  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Yes that resistance is achieved by changing the mixture slightly. If a car isn't set up to deal with the octane, it's just a waste.
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 03:24 PM
  #12  
newbiewonkenobe's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: MidWest
I also agree its a waste running higher octane unless your car needs it. And of course, it is true, running higher than necessary can hurt your engine. newer cars today, unless specified otherwise, should only run 87. I was switching around betyween 89 and 93 (I have piggy back from rrm). I didn't notice any difference at all between the two - so I just stick with the 89 now. Interestingly enough (I know others have said the same) with all my mods, and then having to run higher octane fuel, I am pretty sure I'm getting BETTER gas milage than I used to. That would seem to make sense, the piggyback basically leans out the mixture, and the few basic mods I have are only increasing hp, so I figure less gass + more power = more mpg?
Reply
Old May 29, 2007 | 03:50 PM
  #13  
Noe18's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 821
Likes: 1
From: Staten island, NY
I've heard that if you have the RRM PB and used higher octane that ur going to get more mpg
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 02:25 PM
  #14  
2003TurboLancer's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Zionsville, PA
I run 93 because I'm boosted. 87 is fine for non-turbo/ normal compression engines though.

99% of people with stock cars that say 93 runs better are suffering from "It is more expensive, it MUST be better!" syndrome. 93 octane actually bruns slower than 87, therefore unless you have high compression, 93 doesn't help you at all.
Reply
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #15  
atilla's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
From: NH
i have a RRM-tuned piggyback which is set up for 93. i run 93 and it runs fine. i don't even look at the price anymore. not like i have an option to not pay it or anything.
Reply




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:40 PM.