Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Future Mods. RRM, other vendors, anyone.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2007, 07:45 PM
  #16  
Newbie
 
2008BLACKGTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Better add a set of high compression pistons to that list. What we have now just isn't going to cut it unless you add some FI.
Old Aug 7, 2007, 07:25 AM
  #17  
Evolving Member
Thread Starter
 
specialk8519's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Palmetto
Posts: 165
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm not sure if I want to do F/I. I kind of would like to keep it N/A. I've done turbo with my SRT-4 and GSX, now I want to build strong N/A.

So with: Piggyback or new ECU, pulley, exhaust, intake, header, high flow head, cams, injectors, throttle body w/spacer, and what every else you can do you a N/A. Could I hit 200hp or more?
Old Aug 7, 2007, 09:15 AM
  #18  
Evolved Member
 
SeRious08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Its possible. But its going to take $$$$$$$$$$$. Yes a fast NA car is impressive, but for less $$ you can have a faster car and enough change to go to the strip.
Old Aug 7, 2007, 11:00 AM
  #19  
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (88)
 
Blacksheepdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Concord Township, Ohio
Posts: 8,733
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by specialk8519
I'm not sure if I want to do F/I. I kind of would like to keep it N/A. I've done turbo with my SRT-4 and GSX, now I want to build strong N/A.

So with: Piggyback or new ECU, pulley, exhaust, intake, header, high flow head, cams, injectors, throttle body w/spacer, and what every else you can do you a N/A. Could I hit 200hp or more?
Highly doubt it.

I know the 4B11 is a new motor, but we can all agree that it's not a V8. People with fully-modded 4G94 motors saw minimal gains. Granted, no one has had the exact list you have, but I just don't see 200 hp coming N/A. Maybe someone will prove me wrong...
Old Aug 7, 2007, 11:43 AM
  #20  
Evolving Member
 
the_cosworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: YYC, Ab, Ca
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I got a question about how a F/I system will be implemented with the MIVEC.

Will the MIVEC need to be disabled due to the cam settings or can you just engineer it to work with the MIVEC.

I don't have a specific concern about one thing, just a funny feeling that there is more to it then just bolting it up and letting it run.
Old Aug 7, 2007, 07:32 PM
  #21  
Newbie
 
2008BLACKGTS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The concept of the MIVEC will still be valid, however, a controller would be nice in order to maximize the gains. Typically aftermarket manfacturers will remove the variable timing when they design new cams for simplicity. These new cams are designed to perform well in a certain rpm range.
Old Aug 8, 2007, 08:13 AM
  #22  
Evolved Member
 
SeRious08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Blacksheepdj
Highly doubt it.

I know the 4B11 is a new motor, but we can all agree that it's not a V8. People with fully-modded 4G94 motors saw minimal gains. Granted, no one has had the exact list you have, but I just don't see 200 hp coming N/A. Maybe someone will prove me wrong...
I know its a different platform but my previous car was deep into the 170s whp. It had the stock block. All this from a ZX2.
Old Aug 8, 2007, 06:08 PM
  #23  
Evolving Member
 
Mystic_Korean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by specialk8519
I'm not sure if I want to do F/I. I kind of would like to keep it N/A. I've done turbo with my SRT-4 and GSX, now I want to build strong N/A.

So with: Piggyback or new ECU, pulley, exhaust, intake, header, high flow head, cams, injectors, throttle body w/spacer, and what every else you can do you a N/A. Could I hit 200hp or more?
If you add some high compression pistons with it, sure. Not that hard to reach another 50HP with all those mods together + tunning.

You guys need to understand that this is a DOHC... unlike the SOHC. This will allow for a lot more tunning options and gains than a 4g94. Also, with aftermarket parts coming out for the EVO X, I'm pretty sure we'll see 200+ HP N/A.
Old Aug 8, 2007, 06:40 PM
  #24  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
jRox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Union, NJ
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^^lets hope so.
Old Aug 18, 2007, 07:19 PM
  #25  
Evolving Member
 
Stuntfly02's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
a k20A3(rsx and civic) honda N/A can easily push 210 and if im not mistaken have less chp than the 4b11 stock. So untill someone runs a full N/A setup(possibly with ITBs) we wont know if it will do 200hp or not. Also with the changing of rev limits and balancing the engine i dont see why this couldnt be turned into a high revving N/A beast

Last edited by Stuntfly02; Aug 18, 2007 at 07:25 PM.
Old Aug 19, 2007, 10:55 PM
  #26  
Newbie
 
08Icelancer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: vancouver
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
it would be pretty cool to see some high hp na lancers but i think ill go the turbo route eventually
Old Sep 2, 2007, 08:22 AM
  #27  
Evolving Member
 
the_cosworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: YYC, Ab, Ca
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have a request for a couple mods, keep an eye out and PM me if you see these please and thank you




+Short throw kit
+Different side markers, the stocks just look cheap
+different antenna for the car (maybe one like the new GM's or BMW's?)
Old Sep 2, 2007, 01:52 PM
  #28  
Evolved Member
 
SeRious08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I spoke to a TWM tech on Friday. He stated that they are just spooling up to R&D a short shifter. For those that have no experience with TWM, I rate them over B&M.
Old Sep 2, 2007, 05:11 PM
  #29  
Evolving Member
 
the_cosworth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: YYC, Ab, Ca
Posts: 377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SeRious08
I spoke to a TWM tech on Friday. He stated that they are just spooling up to R&D a short shifter. For those that have no experience with TWM, I rate them over B&M.


how long do they take for development if you have any experience with them.

and is this them?

http://www.twmperformance.com/
Old Sep 2, 2007, 08:25 PM
  #30  
Evolved Member
 
SeRious08's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ft Worth
Posts: 606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Yes, that is them. They didn't give me a time frame, but the tech said that the 08s setup if fairly similar to the older Lancers. So they might be able to just use the 06 Lancer short shifter. IDK. He said they were going to try it out.


Quick Reply: Future Mods. RRM, other vendors, anyone.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:00 PM.