Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

High Compression Pistons

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 08:00 PM
  #16  
urbanknight's Avatar
Moderator
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
I was just thinking today, if I raised the compression on a 91 octane reflash, would I have to run race fuel? Or would 91 still be ok? And would I still get a benefit from the higher compression? hmmm, questions to ask Rob.
Reply
Old Aug 7, 2003 | 10:11 PM
  #17  
sharpie's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: SoCal Inland Empire
Originally posted by urbanknight
I was just thinking today, if I raised the compression on a 91 octane reflash, would I have to run race fuel? Or would 91 still be ok? And would I still get a benefit from the higher compression? hmmm, questions to ask Rob.
This is something I have been wondering about. I am wanting to go NA with my car, and getting higher compressions is a step in that direction.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2003 | 11:27 AM
  #18  
urbanknight's Avatar
Moderator
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
I'll be talking to Rob within the next few days (almost have enough $ to reflash), so I'll let you know what he says.
Reply
Old Aug 8, 2003 | 12:01 PM
  #19  
!!!!!!!!!!!!!0Z's Avatar
In Timeout
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 85
Likes: 0
From: TEAMSLAM.COM
Billy is doing this. (Link286XT)

I'll end up doing both pistons and rods, but not before I can get them for a normalized price.

Frankly, I'm sick of this ****:
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 04:38 AM
  #20  
TypeIII's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
From: 852 604 765 408
If you're running an NA setup, and this is NOT your track car (read: running pump gas) then IMO it really isn't worth it for you to change to "high compression" pistons. You'll be running at best 11:0 give or take a little and the gain you'll be seeing is simply not worth the time and effort involved. Now, if you are considering going the nitrous route, then I would see why you want to strengthen your bottom end but still you would want to stay away from having a high compression setup.

If this IS your track car (which I doubt cuz' otherwise you probably wouldn't be asking these questions to start with) then you can run much higher than 11:0 as you'll be feeding her race gas all the time. I've seen comp ratio as high as 16:0 with my friend's setup. Then again static compression ratio alone doesn't give you the whole picture, ignition timing, cam phasing, etc etc play a major role as well.

And finally, if this is for a forced induction setup then you DEFINITELY don't want a high CR setup. You'd yield much better result with lower CR and higher boost.
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 07:39 PM
  #21  
dalin's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: denver, co
pistons, rods, crank

how much are pistons and rods going for these days?
do you think it's ok to leave the stock crank?

Originally posted by !!!!!!!!!!!!!0Z
Billy is doing this. (Link286XT)

I'll end up doing both pistons and rods, but not before I can get them for a normalized price.

Frankly, I'm sick of this ****:
Reply
Old Aug 12, 2003 | 08:05 PM
  #22  
illizit's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
From: miami, FL
Re: stock pistons

Originally posted by dalin
from what i read on this site and talking to a local mod shop, the stock pistons NEED to be replaced if any serious mod is done. i have a 2003 OZ and was under the impression, when i bought it, that i was getting almost the same thing as the EVO without the turbo. dead wrong about that. i figure if i got an EVO, i'd be modding it anyway and starting from $28k.
anyone, especially with a turbo, know if the stock pistons NEED to be replaced like i've heard?

they dont need to be replaced if your going to a run a turbo at about 5-7 PSI max as a daily driver. If your into pure performance then your going to want low compression pistons and intercooler to prevent detonation and run higer boost (10 psi). anything after that your going to need new valve springs, etc..
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2003 | 12:28 AM
  #23  
urbanknight's Avatar
Moderator
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally posted by TypeIII
If you're running an NA setup, and this is NOT your track car (read: running pump gas) then IMO it really isn't worth it for you to change to "high compression" pistons. You'll be running at best 11:0 give or take a little and the gain you'll be seeing is simply not worth the time and effort involved. Now, if you are considering going the nitrous route, then I would see why you want to strengthen your bottom end but still you would want to stay away from having a high compression setup.

If this IS your track car (which I doubt cuz' otherwise you probably wouldn't be asking these questions to start with) then you can run much higher than 11:0 as you'll be feeding her race gas all the time. I've seen comp ratio as high as 16:0 with my friend's setup. Then again static compression ratio alone doesn't give you the whole picture, ignition timing, cam phasing, etc etc play a major role as well.

And finally, if this is for a forced induction setup then you DEFINITELY don't want a high CR setup. You'd yield much better result with lower CR and higher boost.
Thank you, that sounds like you know what you're talking about. I'll probably just stick with the NA reflash on stock pistons.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JohnBradley
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
165
Jun 7, 2018 02:53 PM
94AWDcoupe
For Sale/WTB - Engine / Drivetrain / Power
4
Oct 21, 2016 08:41 AM
fknlowpsi
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
4
Jul 19, 2015 12:24 PM
Evo8Emperor
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
8
Oct 12, 2007 08:22 PM
gregivq
Lancer General
64
Oct 7, 2005 09:08 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:46 AM.