RRM V2 SRI V.s. Injen CAI
RRM V2 SRI V.s. Injen CAI
I currently have the RRM V1 intake, and with my birthday coming up i plan on getting something new for my car as a gift to myself...
which one would be better? haven't really heard to much from people that have either of these 2 products...anyone wanna help shed some light on which would be better purely performance-wise?
which one would be better? haven't really heard to much from people that have either of these 2 products...anyone wanna help shed some light on which would be better purely performance-wise?
If you're going to drop 300$, I'd just get a different part rather than replace the intake you already purchased. Maybe an exhaust? If you only want to replace the intake, the RRM V2 is nice, I have a few videos of it on youtube.
From what I've gathered from reading these forums over the passed few months; is that the Injen CAI gives better top-end power, and an SRI gives better low-end power.
IMO there's probably not much difference except price.
From what I've gathered from reading these forums over the passed few months; is that the Injen CAI gives better top-end power, and an SRI gives better low-end power.
IMO there's probably not much difference except price.
installation of the CAI is more of a ***** compared to the SRI's.. especially when you have to clean the fitre more often too..
Trending Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Coray
Lancer Tires, Wheels, Brakes & Suspension - Sponsored by The Tire Rack
23
May 11, 2010 10:29 AM
mitralliart
Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
14
Mar 5, 2009 12:03 PM
OZking425
Lancer Engine Management / Tuning Forums
1
Oct 31, 2008 06:58 PM
08, 2008, cai, crankshaft, elolutionm, injen, intake, lancer, mitsubishi, pulley, rrm, sri, v1, v2, vs




