Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Drop in filter VS. CAI/short ram

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 06:31 PM
  #1  
blackdiamonds's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: Miami, Florida
Drop in filter VS. CAI/short ram

Skip to the bottum if you don't feel like reading the story

I went to my dealership today to go get my liscence plate while I was there I asked the car technician about buying a new air intake/exhaust and if it would void my warranty(Nope) effects on AF ratio (Not really) stuff like that. So anyway I asked him would it be better to get a drop in filter or to buy a whole new intake system. He told me I could get a new system if I wanted but there wasn't really a point since I would obviously keep my car N/A. I asked him why and he tells me that your car is still going to breath almost the same because the suction in the plastic piping would not shrink, how ever the plastic piping would shrink under high amounts of pressure ( FI) so to really get most of the use out of a new system with metal piping you would boost your car so there would be no bending in the piping of the intake.

So long story short, if the metal piping is so you don't lose boost in the intake, what is the point getting a whole new system on an N/A over a drop in? The chrome doesn't count


Last edited by blackdiamonds; Apr 14, 2009 at 06:33 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 06:37 PM
  #2  
Sr20kidD's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: WestSideIII
smooth airflow as opposed to that ribbed tube and less turbulance
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2009 | 10:46 PM
  #3  
BABYGOTBACK's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh,NC
I kept the ribbed rubber piece for the SRI, because I think rubber conducts less heat then the chrome piping. Maybe not as nice looking, but the air going into the throttle body might be a few degrees cooler! Just my opinion though. By no means a scientific answer

Last edited by BABYGOTBACK; Apr 15, 2009 at 04:44 AM.
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 04:27 AM
  #4  
EngRWW33's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 705
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Well, you tech was right, to a degree. There will not be huge gains either way, but the main difference, at least in our cars, is going to be sound. If you want some sound to go along with that intake, then get the full system. If you just want your car to breathe a bit better, maybe gain 2-3 hp, go with the drop in.
Even if you were to go FI, you would have to toss a full system because a turbo kit would come with its own. differnce of gains would probably be 5-8 hp vs 2-3 hp. Not Much in the end. I went with drop in and axle back just for a bit better breathing, nothing major at all!!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 04:47 AM
  #5  
BABYGOTBACK's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh,NC
I think that with the stock airbox Mitsubishi has made for the Lancers, it actually breaths fairly well for a economy car. Hard to squeeze much more power out of something that is already efficient for the displacement size!
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 11:01 AM
  #6  
DapperDAve123's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
From: Florida
just get a short ram intake system... you can find them anywhere and they are easy 2 install. check ebay and www. roadracemotorsports.com
Reply
Old Apr 15, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #7  
BABYGOTBACK's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
From: Raleigh,NC
You can even get a adapter at the local auto parts store, and attach a K&N if you have the $$, if not, then just get the generic brand from the store. You will still essentially get the same effect. Just make sure the MAF sensor is attached correctly and sealed!
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JeremyP
09+ Ralliart Engine/Turbo/Drivetrain
7
Mar 25, 2016 01:22 PM
arock90
Lancer Engine Tech
9
Nov 1, 2012 07:01 AM
turbooutlaw1976
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
7
Jun 28, 2010 04:04 AM
evo_soul
Lancer Engine Tech
20
Dec 15, 2009 02:01 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:03 PM.