Notices
Lancer Engine Tech Discuss specs/changes to the engine from cams to fully balanced and blueprinted engines!

Predator Performance Lancer GTS (Stage 2)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 11:51 AM
  #1  
The_Predat0r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: San Juan, PR
Predator Performance Lancer GTS (Stage 2)

Some of you may remember our Lancer GTS:



We went to the track completely stock and managed to do 15.80, this were the results using stock rims, tires and full weight:

60': 2.33
1/8: 10.14 @ 69mph
1/4: 15.80 @ 86.5


This were the stock numbers on a Mustang Dyno:




After that we decided to install an HKS axle back exhaust and didnt touch the rest of the exhaust, the car has all stock resonators and cats:





This exhaust sound really good and is very very quiet at idle, sometimes I think the car stalled, LOL

After that we installed our own Predator Performance Pulley:









The only other mod the car has is a dropin HKS filter and the intake scoop from a RallyArt Turbo:



Then, we performed a basic Predator Performance reflash in our dyno and these were the results:





Not bad considering the basic mods the car has. The next day we went to the track and this were the results:

60': 2.2
1/8: 9.80 @ 72mph
1/4: 15.19 @ 91.11


60': 2.23
1/8: 9.75 @ 72mph
1/4: 15.16 @ 90.5

Those are just 2 of the 5 passes we did, all of them between 15.1 to 15.3 and always 90 to 91mph. We think those are good gains for such minimal mods and a very quiet car.

We have tests, comparisons and dynoruns specifically for each mod, I will post some more later... Thanks....

Last edited by The_Predat0r; Aug 16, 2009 at 01:08 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 09:46 PM
  #2  
mojeorliy's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Good to see news from PR! How much weight the pulley?
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2009 | 09:50 PM
  #3  
lancer0220's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
is that a current clamp i see in the engine bay ? im not sure but thats what it looks like to me. heh
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 03:07 AM
  #4  
The_Predat0r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: San Juan, PR
Originally Posted by lancer0220
is that a current clamp i see in the engine bay ? im not sure but thats what it looks like to me. heh
Its to read RPMs, that pic was on the dyno.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 06:15 AM
  #5  
lancer0220's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 1
From: San Antonio, TX
Originally Posted by The_Predat0r
Its to read RPMs, that pic was on the dyno.


yeah i figured it was on the dyno i didnt think you all would be driving around with a current clamp

good looking data/numbers keep it up.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 12:03 PM
  #6  
Hydrolikz's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 802
Likes: 0
From: ¯\(º_o)/¯
Nice, glad to see some shops are still looking out for the non-evo's.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 12:05 PM
  #7  
MasterAK's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 614
Likes: 1
From: North NJ
So is that an 08 or 09 gts?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 01:54 PM
  #8  
LiX's Avatar
LiX
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 210
Likes: 1
From: Bulgaria
What is the part number of ralliart scoop?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 02:04 PM
  #9  
AhFuJai's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Montreal, QC, Canada
u guys sell that pulley?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2009 | 05:39 PM
  #10  
EngRWW33's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 705
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
Originally Posted by MasterAK
So is that an 08 or 09 gts?
09. two things tell me that, the numbers and the engine cover. Those numbers are far too good for a 2.0l.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 03:34 AM
  #11  
LiX's Avatar
LiX
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 210
Likes: 1
From: Bulgaria
Originally Posted by EngRWW33
09. two things tell me that, the numbers and the engine cover. Those numbers are far too good for a 2.0l.
I got the same engine cover and my engine is 1.8 L
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 04:58 AM
  #12  
EngRWW33's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 705
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
yes, but what year is it?

at least in the us, 08s had a silver mitsu/mivec badge. 09s black.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 05:08 AM
  #13  
thielepr's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: PR
I'm pretty sure is a 09. Good development here guys
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 06:18 AM
  #14  
LiX's Avatar
LiX
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 210
Likes: 1
From: Bulgaria
Originally Posted by EngRWW33
yes, but what year is it?

at least in the us, 08s had a silver mitsu/mivec badge. 09s black.
In Europe is black, 08 Lancer.
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2009 | 07:27 PM
  #15  
The_Predat0r's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
From: San Juan, PR
Sorry, have been busy working with the Lancer!

We spent a little more time on the dyno today trying to get more horses, we saw some gains playing with the Mivec, the car now has 165whp and the torque curve looks a lot better. This is in a Mustang Dyno that reads around 8-10% lower than a Dynojet. The car still has no intake or exhaust, just axle back.

We will continue with the tuning, but we are now seeing that the cat is becoming a restriction when its cold, apparently when it gets hotter if becomes a lot more efficient. You can clearly see it in the curve and AFR when you do 2 pulls in a row.

Next time we are going to the track with better numbers and without the 18" rims, we expect some mid 14's in the near future on 93oct.




Here are the timeslips of the previous runs:



Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:10 PM.