Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

Dyno RRM Turbo Lancer

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 11:44 AM
  #31  
stygiosracing's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
when you think asbout it though, the lancers perform well with that amount of horses. most fwd cars do.... i dont see why people think that 180hp and 210tq is not worth the money. i have a friend with an all motor civic that runs 13's. it cant have more than 200 horse.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 05:01 PM
  #32  
GreenPsycho's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 1
From: Kansas Now/Louisiana/Connecticut
just curious: you said the car is running lean and your working on fixing it right now, so if the car was running in tip top shape, what projected whp numbers would we be looking at?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 05:10 PM
  #33  
bahamut's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,167
Likes: 0
From: TB, FL
Are you using stock injectors?
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 06:02 PM
  #34  
Viciouz's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,830
Likes: 0
From: Southern Cali
Hey lancerguy, I got the same **** you got, probably just a few more things, but I am spanking ponies and rex's all day, i even took a nsx one day, hard to believe but i did... just wait, imma dyno my car soon, i'll show u numbers, and as for u rippmodds guys, look at his torque, thats a **** load of torque for a car that only has 120 hp stock.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 06:07 PM
  #35  
Hotshot940's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,555
Likes: 0
From: Columbus, Ohio
those numbers seem like they could be right, i have stage 1 intercooled, exhaust manifold, intake manifold, 2.5 downpipe...well...everything listen below. good enough for about 200 whp and great response.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #36  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
Nice numbers man...

Just read all this and see some **** talkers and some praisers. Forget RIPP and their crying little wimpers. Fact is your producing way more torque than them and more horsepower.

Their kit may be about 600 bucks less but their kit still requires a header which drops that savings down by half. With a header on your car you'd pull another 10hp and tq probably.

Lets just say you should be proud as you will mop the floor agains a stage 1 and probably even a stage 2 ripp kit. Your boost is full on at around 3k and they don't see full boost till about 5500rpm.

Its nice how they claim to be so civil and nice then come into your post and bash.

danno needs to back out as well... this guys should be proud for what he's acheived and he knows first hand his car is fast as hell now.

In the end you've done well and from what your saying your leaning out a little bit so we need to get that fixed. Most common problem there is overboosting... gauge says 7 but you're probably pulling closer to 8. PM me and well get it figured out. Glad to see another satisfied RRM customer backing up numbers once again.

And as for the stage 2 rrm kit comment if you don't know what your talking about don't stick your foot in your mouth. Just stay out of the post unless you have some definate contributions or serious comments.

RIPP blows... but RRM blows better gotta love turbo!!

Last edited by Boeturbolancer; Jan 28, 2005 at 08:20 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #37  
twinkiemobile's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco/Phoenix
NiCE numbers, i wish i was keeping my turbo on my Lancer, I have JE pistons in there with non i/c header and test pipe. but, taking off the turbo and selling all parts inorder to modify my new baby a little bit more..

again, very NiCE numbers.. i hope one day to return to modding the Lancer and make use of those pistons. good luck.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 06:35 PM
  #38  
platinumspecv's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 875
Likes: 0
From: Port Saint Lucie, FL (South FL)
who the hell tuned ur car to a 13.9-12.4 airfuel ??
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 06:53 PM
  #39  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
i think he's overboosting... even though his gauge states 7 psi i'll almost guarantee he's running about 8. Especially if it's a mechanical gauge. about the most accurate gauge i've seen thus far is the greddy that works off a map sensor style setup.

Other than that only full electronic/independant map sensor based are accurate to within .2 psi .

I'm working with him right now to get things down to safer limits.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 07:18 PM
  #40  
nextgenerationx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: New York!
Originally Posted by Boeturbolancer
Nice numbers man...

Just read all this and see some **** talkers and some praisers. Forget RIPP and their crying little wimpers. Fact is your producing way more torque than them and more horsepower.

Their kit may be about 600 bucks less but their kit still requires a header which drops that savings down by half. With a header on your car you'd pull another 10hp and tq probably.

Lets just say you should be proud as you will mop the floor agains a stage 1 and probably even a stage 2 ripp kit. Your boost is full on at around 3k and they don't see full boost till about 5500rpm.

Its nice how they claim to be so civil and nice then come into your post and bash.

PGmike needs to back out as well... this guys should be proud for what he's acheived and he knows first hand his car is fast as hell now.

In the end you've done well and from what your saying your leaning out a little bit so we need to get that fixed. Most common problem there is overboosting... gauge says 7 but you're probably pulling closer to 8. PM me and well get it figured out. Glad to see another satisfied RRM customer backing up numbers once again.

And as for the stage 2 rrm kit comment if you don't know what your talking about don't stick your foot in your mouth. Just stay out of the post unless you have some definate contributions or serious comments.

RIPP blows... but RRM blows better gotta love turbo!!
wow have u learned nothing, u should learn to shut the *** up. i'm tired of u. i did not come here and ***en bash. if u look at my post it says nice trq numbers.. last time i check thats a ***en complement. no one here is bashin him well atleast i kno i'm not and neither is Ripp. ur the one who brought up Ripp.
to tell u the truth boe, u look like and idiot everytime u post about Ripp. cause it comes out of nowhere. ha this is funny actually. ahhahahha wimpy Ripp kits. i wonder where that came from. u should learn to get ur act together and respect others. i take it personally everytime u bash on Ripp. than again i will say this agian. GREAT TRQ numbers. 210 is alot of trq comin out of that kit. **** man. akways comparing, RRM vs Ripp that RRm vs. RIpp on that. its great to c u at it agian boe always great to c. it humors me. Does it satisfy u to down a company. Can u tell me whats Ripp feels about how there kits r made? i think it goes Most reliable with big power. k it might not be 260whp at 15lbs with all the supporting mods that rrm sells. but stage 2 (sry if this aint independant so go suck it up will ya) 222whp and 221trq. stage 1 180whp and i don't remember trq. hey look at that. "Just read all this and see some **** talkers and some praisers. Forget RIPP and their crying little wimpers. Fact is your producing way more torque than them and more horsepower. ..Lets just say you should be proud as you will mop the floor agains a stage 1 and probably even a stage 2 ripp kit. " show these pple vital n tru information not false. Which is the main reason y pple do not invest money on the Ripp kit cuase everytime u bash its witha false statement. i kno it and u kno it. pple respect u on the boards b.c u r technically smart but i don't respect u because u aint nothing but P.O.S to me. sry man but u start all this kid. and if i get band o well, so there u have it ur plan will suceed wipe RIPP right off the face of the lancer group.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 07:23 PM
  #41  
WADADLIG_OZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
We feel your frustration nextg

You are not alone.

WADAD
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 07:52 PM
  #42  
ROCK's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 7,826
Likes: 3
From: Santa Fe Springs, CA.
Nice numbers. We have seen bigger number from our kits but I am sure with the torque you have you can hand most guys their heads.



ROAD/RACE
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 08:01 PM
  #43  
nextgenerationx's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 673
Likes: 0
From: New York!
does anyone else c this or feel my frustration.. y do i feel i'm always attacked by Boe, hey all to rrm turbos out there do i ever bash on the turbo kit? never i respect the kit. its a great strong kit. ROCK, u sure boe is tryin to put out good words for rrm when bashin Ripp. idk but Boe has to chill. idk but i just want to apologize for the

Last edited by nextgenerationx; Jan 27, 2005 at 08:03 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 08:03 PM
  #44  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
Originally Posted by nextgenerationx
nice trq numbers. are you 5spd or auto? what i don't understand is pple who have stage 2 at 9psi say they have 230whp where as at 7psi u have 185? something sounds fishy. not saying u but the people who claim there 230whp. but good to hear u got numbers. i really like the trq numbers at 7psi
here your trying to attack RRM. Even though they've had customers dyno and prove results.

Originally Posted by nextgenerationx
^ u intrested in purchasing the ripp kit? i c u on the ripp boards
here your dropping the RIPP name in when it's not needed... you could pm instead.

Originally Posted by nextgenerationx
^ fkrzo who has the stage 1 supercharged kit from Rippmods ran a dyno. whp was 181 and i forgot the trq,. lemme search and when i find the trq i'll edit. i believe it was 160
again dropping names and numbers...

now since all these posts were before mine i'd think you opened the field first. i'm dropping it now since i see no reason to ruin this guys great day and fine accomplishment. Also you now know what is true and what isn't...

RRM is proud and this is a testiment to their setup.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2005 | 08:09 PM
  #45  
Boeturbolancer's Avatar
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,791
Likes: 1
From: Hemet, CA
by the way i do stay out of things until you have to bring in your 2 cents of meaningless ramble. Are you having ROSS's baby or something. Leave their kit out of it and all would be fine. You could have simply gave props to him and said you expected more.

Instead you dropped your comments and names in regards to RIPP and your kit preference. Damn man... don't you see you're the one that is instigating i'm just telling you to drop it once and for all. We can all get along as long as you respect someones post and don't drop your little kicks in.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:04 PM.