Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

HP/Dyno stats w/ V2 piggy back ?!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:06 AM
  #1  
modelchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
HP/Dyno stats w/ V2 piggy back ?!

Being stock, or few mods as possible with a v2. piggy back, what is our hp at ?! And torque?! I'm just curious to see just how much power exactly do you get with either JUST the piggyback, or no serious mods..? and i appologize if this is a re-post , or has already been discussed. dont flame. Cause $480 is a lot of money, and i'm trying to figure out if it's worth a save?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #2  
gregivq's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,387
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
-imapunkclaimer - 3rd gear-
aem intake, roadrace piggyback.

115.5whp@5700
126.2wtq@3600


^Hope this helps, straight from Dyno'd Lancer Thread.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 06:16 PM
  #3  
LancerOZ Boy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville Florida
Isnt stock like 90 whp?
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 06:35 PM
  #4  
CityKnight's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 867
Likes: 1
From: Philly
Yeah. Damn, thats like an old Civic

Last edited by CityKnight; Jul 6, 2006 at 06:39 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2006 | 11:06 PM
  #5  
modelchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
wait, so what's with the 120 HP in the brochure for our cars, and the 130lb ft. of tq ??
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 12:42 AM
  #6  
TEJ's Avatar
TEJ
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: AZ
Originally Posted by modelchris
wait, so what's with the 120 HP in the brochure for our cars, and the 130lb ft. of tq ??
That is for advertising and its not WHP.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 05:21 AM
  #7  
LancerOZ Boy's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 396
Likes: 0
From: Jacksonville Florida
If you buy a piggyback going n/a and then decide to switch to forced induction dont you have to get them to reprogram it?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 05:23 AM
  #8  
EvoRecordSetter's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,123
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
they always tell you the power your engine makes, not the power your engine actually puts to the ground, considering it loses power due to the drivetrain parts, the weight of the wheels and such.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 09:28 AM
  #9  
SLVROZ_03's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 4,796
Likes: 0
From: Greenville, SC
Chris, it's the factory flywheel horsepower on the engine dyno... It's rated before the tranny, axle, and wheels power loss.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 03:52 PM
  #10  
thcomb's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
I just installed my piggy v.2. I have a crank pulley, and an RMR short ram intake. I've already taken the car for the initial 25 minute drive, but I won't really test it out until I've gone about 50 miles. I'll post when I get there.
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #11  
modelchris's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 0
From: Tuscaloosa, AL
thanks guys, so it's liiiike, maybe a 25 HP increase? maybe? Haha. our cars are soo damn slow. argh, i'm so aggrivated with having no power.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 06:36 PM
  #12  
thcomb's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
I'm really not too impressed now that I'm over 50 miles. Although I won't completely make up my mind until after a week or two. I do think, this is one of those mods that needs more mods to really be noticed. The butt dyno saw nothing, however I do seem to accelerate a bit quicker. I don't know about this more torque throughout the power band claim. The install isn't bad at all. Just get a wireless soldering iron.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 06:37 PM
  #13  
thcomb's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
From: Wichita, KS
I'm also running 89 octane.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2006 | 08:10 PM
  #14  
lancerman360's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 1
From: Lufkin, Texas
I thought you had to have at least 91 octane. Thats what its programed for isint it? You are going to fu#k your engine like that.
Reply
Old Jul 9, 2006 | 12:06 AM
  #15  
TeAmEmPeRoR's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 633
Likes: 0
From: V-Town, Yay Area Cali
i think RRM reprogrammed to be able to run on 89 octane now......thats at least what the new ones they sell on their site now say.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:54 PM.