1/4 mile times?

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

Feb 9, 2004 | 12:35 AM

#16

urbanknight

Bomb Squad Unit #02

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Aug 2002

Posts: 4,090

Likes: 1

From: Los Angeles, CA

Quote:

Originally posted by bahamut

Edit: UrbanKnight and WADADLIG are one of the few people who I respect have enough hard data, time, and practice to produce unbias timeslips.

Thanks, that makes me feel loved... Too bad WADAD has the better times of the two of us

Anyway, if this matters to you, I think you would have to spend more $$$ to get an NA Lancer under 16 seconds than you would to just turbo it and get low 15s. Just in case you are trying to stay NA to be cost effective.

Feb 9, 2004 | 07:33 AM

#17

my-lancer

Evolving Member

iTrader: (10)

Joined: May 2003

Posts: 180

Likes: 1

From: Chicago

03 lancer, AEM cai and RRM header. Everything else stock. 17.1 and 17.0

Feb 9, 2004 | 11:35 AM

#18

rhyzin

EvoM Guru

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Mar 2002

Posts: 1,827

Likes: 0

From: From SLO to San Jose

i ran 17.2 with no real launch, shifting high, but not hard. ran a 17.9 with a mis-shift into second. the rest of my runs had mis-shifts(i'm such a noob). a lot of people complained of a slippery track first hundred feet that day but that's no excuse. makes me wonder how much time you lose with a mis-shift.

modified MAS
K&N filter and adapter
axleback exhaust
120lph fuel pump
rising rate fpr
apexi safc
poor tuning