Notices
Lancer General Come on in and discuss the US Lancer.

N/A Lancer SET UP

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 01:01 AM
  #16  
urbanknight's Avatar
Moderator
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
It's really hard to tell how much hp and torque you will get. Nobody really knows how well mod A will work with mod B and then you throw in all the other variables. I would simply go as far as saying that the RMR rally lancer dynoed at 145 hp (not positive if that's at the wheels or not), naturally aspirated. Knowing they are a top company, I would say that's about as good as you can get going n/a, although they built it to SCCA rules, so there might be a thing or two they couldn't do.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 02:16 AM
  #17  
LancerO-Z's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu, Hawaii
Ok so what if I'll get the same setup as Stumpy221? + non-intercooled turbo kit from rrm?
How much HP???
Would it be worth it?
Then I can go farther with IC?
I'm just kind of unhappy with Lancer being so dang slow.
Well maybe not as slow, it supposed to have 120hp (in the crank).
but on the dyno it has only 102hp so what caunts is the wheel power.
First, if you wanna go RRM, you need there header, not Kamikaze, just some FYI. (Assuming this is with the GReddy exhaust) With RRM non intercooled kit at 5 psi with the throttle body you are looking at 170WHP give or take . If you go intercooled, you are right at 210 WHP.. If you wanna shed the dough, you can go with RRM stage 2 and run 230+ WHP.

For serious gains, you gotta go the forced induction route as urbanknioght said.. The N/A route is gonna end real soon, as I am sure the MIVEC will take over the lead as the top tunable engine in the non-EVO class (and I doubt one can be fit into the 2002-2003 Lancer without many costly modifications).. I can't say that for sure, but I am pretty certain of it.


if you go all N/A with everything meaning you get everything you need what is the max horsepower you can possibly get? Anyone know?
Basically what you see on here is what we know. The one N/A mod no one has tried is the quad throttle body from RPW. It will take a lot of money and tuning to get it right, and I still doubt you wil have the same HP as the RRM non intercooled kit after you spend more money than it is on the the TB. I respect you N/A guys, but I don't think the N/A market for the Lancer is gonna put you guys in a class with the FI Lancers (if that is what you are looking for). If all motor is what you want, go for it. Nothing but respect for that. It is all about what you want out of your car. Just decide and go with that.

Last edited by LancerO-Z; Jul 18, 2004 at 02:18 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 02:34 AM
  #18  
twinkiemobile's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 246
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco/Phoenix
I think it was Ntrance999 or someone.. he had a non-i/c RRM turbo kit with RRM headers test pipe and exhaust set to 5psi.. he had an automatic.. and he got about 174 whp i think... i'm pretty sure the thread is still here somewhere i had it before.. Also.. someone had the RRM non-ic kit set to 6 psi with RRM header + Test Pipe + N1 cat-back exhaust and he ran a 14.6 on the 1/4.. its posted somewhere here.. i've been searching this forum for so long and i'm still figuring my set-up..

Currently.. i have the non-i/c turbo kit set to 5psi with headers and testpipe... no exhaust yet.. i just rewrapped my pipes with thermotech cool it wrap and replaced some of my gaskets etc. etc. *(had some problems with the extreme heat and no heatshield on the RRM header)

however.. let me tell you.. i dont exactly know what type of power i'm putting down.. but lets just say.. i can beat my friends celica GTS.. i've beaten an eclipse GS-T... RSX-S.. a whole bunch of b-series hatches, crx's, civics... The turbo kit is definately worth the money if you're looking for power..
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 02:45 AM
  #19  
petey pab's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
dude, if you cant decide on which way you wanna go start workin on suspension. that is THE MOST fun you can have with this car IMO. get a nice set of tires, some light rims, and whatever else you can afford. the corners i take in my car are just AMAZING. sooo much more fun than straight line racing.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 01:16 PM
  #20  
DjMarkiss's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
dang that kind of sucks i had high hopes of goin all out with the N/A setup because im to lazy to save up enough to turbo it. But I guess it gives you more than stock so its better!
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 06:38 PM
  #21  
Drive02Lancer's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 1
From: BELLEVILLE, IL
i think the fastest n/a Lancer is mid 15's....however...he's spent a lot...

if u want just a little more power, just get intake/header/exhaust and throttle body and piggyback...thats about $1.5k

intake is like $30 on ebay
header is $300~
exhaust is $300~500
RRM has the Throttle Body and Piggyback but i dont know the prices...but they aren't a dime a dozen...
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 06:41 PM
  #22  
Marques's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: CA.......All Day!!!!
yeh i got an intake and exhaust throttle is 289 and ecu is 439
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #23  
WADADLIG_OZ's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,834
Likes: 0
From: Orlando FL
NA lancer

Originally Posted by Drive02Lancer
i think the fastest n/a Lancer is mid 15's....however...he's spent a lot...

Who is that?

the fastest I have heard of is like a 16.0XXX

There is no one in the 15's with a N/A non mivec engine.

WADAD
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2004 | 07:07 PM
  #24  
Marques's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: CA.......All Day!!!!
yeh who does have the fastest N/A now?
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:51 AM
  #25  
petey pab's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
Originally Posted by WADADLIG_OZ
Who is that?

the fastest I have heard of is like a 16.0XXX

There is no one in the 15's with a N/A non mivec engine.

WADAD
yeah, theres some dude (aznflip206) or something like that claiming 15.5 @90 mph, but i dont believe that. i asked the dude for his mods but he hasnt responded. i believe the fastest right now is 16.05, but it should be me any day now if i could get my piggyback workin right and learn how to launch on my new rims and tires.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 03:15 AM
  #26  
AznFlip's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by petey pab
yeah, theres some dude (aznflip206) or something like that claiming 15.5 @90 mph, but i dont believe that. i asked the dude for his mods but he hasnt responded. i believe the fastest right now is 16.05, but it should be me any day now if i could get my piggyback workin right and learn how to launch on my new rims and tires.
It's up to you if you don't believe it or not and I wish you were in the kent pacific raceway so you'd believe it. And I'm not claiming 15.5 because I have 15.6 and I have the timeslip for proof. I already posted my mods on the other thread, go look for it.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 03:20 AM
  #27  
CaliLancerss's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: Cali
Hey dude with the import trenz kit, there is no way you could get a 15secs on your car even if you put that piggyback because your car is an es. you'll be running around mid 16s. LOL
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #28  
urbanknight's Avatar
Moderator
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by CaliLancerss
Hey dude with the import trenz kit, there is no way you could get a 15secs on your car even if you put that piggyback because your car is an es. you'll be running around mid 16s. LOL
Are you saying the ES would be slower than an OZ? The only 2 performance differences between those are rims and a rear say bar, neither of which would affect the quarter mile, not to mention they are easily upgradeable on either model.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:02 PM
  #29  
petey pab's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 946
Likes: 1
From: Jackson, CA (NorCal, Sacramento)
Originally Posted by CaliLancerss
Hey dude with the import trenz kit, there is no way you could get a 15secs on your car even if you put that piggyback because your car is an es. you'll be running around mid 16s. LOL
well, damn.........i guess my many 16.2 runs WITHOUT the piggyback OR my light weight rims means im just gonna get slower when i put those things oh, huh??? lmao....
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2004 | 01:15 PM
  #30  
urbanknight's Avatar
Moderator
Bomb Squad Unit #02
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 4,090
Likes: 1
From: Los Angeles, CA
ok ok I think he gets the point, back on topic ok?
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:44 AM.