Notices
Lancer Show / Shine Find out where to get the newest body kits and spoilers for your Lancer as well as how to keep your car in tip top shape.

Wtf...!?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:49 PM
  #136  
mirage 4g93t's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: the desert
Originally Posted by ambystom01
With bolt-ons? No. Unless I had a magically special Lancer that didn't make power while everyone else has the normal model that makes power, it's pretty same to assume that if another Lancer follows my mod path, they'll get the same results. This is a fairly fundamental principle of science. I have said over and over and over again that when you turbo the car, it's a completely different story. You can make decent power quite easily with a turbo. On topic however, we've gone through what, 10 pages now and we still haven't gotten an answer as to where the 420 WHP number came from. That's all I want to know but apparently that makes me a hater and requires some massive discussion about me as a person and as a moderator and necessitates digging up my results from 2 years ago.
hes banned so he couldnt finish his proof.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:50 PM
  #137  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by mirage 4g93t
those are not facts+ you still didnt get a tune so how would we know what your numbers really were.



this was blacksheeps, his mods were different than yours.

Date: June 22, 2004
Max HP: 93.2hp @ 5750rpms
Max TQ: 95.8tq @ 4250rpms
Dyno Used: Mustang
Facility: Mustang Dynamometer - Twinsburg, Ohio
Temperature: 75
Octane: 87

Modifications: Buschur SRI, downpipe, high flow cat
RRM axleback
Magnacor wires

Notes: Pull was done in 4th gear. Exhaust leak could have affected numbers.
Do you really think that a tune would have made a massive difference, at least enough that it would have made the thousands spent worthwhile? What do you think I would have gained, 20 WHP?
What did a stock Lancer do on the dyno Blacksheep used? We're within 6 WHP of each other.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:50 PM
  #138  
MasterAK's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 614
Likes: 1
From: North NJ
This isn't going anywhere.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #139  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by mirage 4g93t
hes banned so he couldnt finish his proof.
He's banned because he broke the rules. He had 10 pages to provide proof and he didn't.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:51 PM
  #140  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by MasterAK
This isn't going anywhere.
No, I might just close it rather than have the same ****ing discussion as I did 2 years ago.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #141  
mirage 4g93t's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: the desert
Originally Posted by ambystom01
Do you really think that a tune would have made a massive difference, at least enough that it would have made the thousands spent worthwhile? What do you think I would have gained, 20 WHP?
What did a stock Lancer do on the dyno Blacksheep used? We're within 6 WHP of each other.
im not sure if you gained 1, 10, 20 nor 50whp. the point is w/o a tune the numbers are still inaccurate.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:52 PM
  #142  
mirage 4g93t's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: the desert
Originally Posted by ambystom01
He's banned because he broke the rules. He had 10 pages to provide proof and he didn't.
he made a statement that he was going to travel somewhere to get it tuned and dyno.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:55 PM
  #143  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by mirage 4g93t
im not sure if you gained 1, 10, 20 nor 50whp. the point is w/o a tune the numbers are still inaccurate.
Let's use some logic. I know, I know, logic has no place on a car forum but entertain me this idea. My AF graph was identical to the stock lancer, identical. This means the mods I did didn't have any affect on the stock tune. Logically this means the changes that could be made to my tune could also be made to the stock Lancer. Now then, I had the ability to take in a bit more air and expel a bit more exhaust gases as evident by my higher HP number. This would translate to a bit more power after a tune. Given that these are 120 crank HP cars and on this dyno 83 WHP cars, if we assume that the max gain would be 10% (a big gain for just a tune on an NA 4-banger), we arrive at a max gain of 8 WHP.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:56 PM
  #144  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
Originally Posted by mirage 4g93t
he made a statement that he was going to travel somewhere to get it tuned and dyno.
Again, where did the original claim of 420 WHP come from? This is the point that virtually everyone is missing. There is this number floating around but where the hell did it come from?
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:57 PM
  #145  
doctorjon's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
From: Forth Worth, Texas
This is getting into another argument. I'm tired lol.
Old Dec 17, 2008 | 09:58 PM
  #146  
ambystom01's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 15,634
Likes: 75
From: Canuckistan
This thread is a waste of time, I didn't start it and it wasn't about my car so I don't see the point in discussing my dyno results or anything else about me. It's going around in circles and frankly I don't have the time to deal with it and it's not productive for anyone (since we've now burned through 3 pages today alone).
If the person with this car wants to start a new thread, they can. If people want to continue this particular discussion, take it to PMs.




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:40 PM.