STi numbers drop in 2007
Originally Posted by STISTL
Boost controller and no engine managment that's why there were so slow. With those mods the car pulls timing like crazy. But hey a win is a win
.
But your right good tune will do wonders, with a tune and other mods a STi was able to pull a car on me, oh by the way I was stock
. I met up with that same STi again, but this time I had mods, and it wasn't pretty
Originally Posted by boomn29
I think because of the Import HP wars, a lot of the domestics have been underating.
Neon SRT4, 05+ Mustang for example gotta been underrated.
Neon SRT4, 05+ Mustang for example gotta been underrated.
I can't believe the unchecked ignorance spewed on this site. The cars rating was accurate by the old standards of testing, now they are still accurate by the new standards of testing. Most cars hp rating went down from what it was. Interesting nobody posts evo's new #'s.
Previous STi's were always faster than evos stock for stock. Nobody was able to reproduce the times the mag testers got for evos, now that was some juiced cars for preproduction testing.
The only thing the evo has over the STi is a nice steering rack, and better stock tires. Truth, deal with it.
Previous STi's were always faster than evos stock for stock. Nobody was able to reproduce the times the mag testers got for evos, now that was some juiced cars for preproduction testing.
The only thing the evo has over the STi is a nice steering rack, and better stock tires. Truth, deal with it.
Originally Posted by Trollski
I can't believe the unchecked ignorance spewed on this site. The cars rating was accurate by the old standards of testing, now they are still accurate by the new standards of testing. Most cars hp rating went down from what it was. Interesting nobody posts evo's new #'s.
Previous STi's were always faster than evos stock for stock. Nobody was able to reproduce the times the mag testers got for evos, now that was some juiced cars for preproduction testing.
The only thing the evo has over the STi is a nice steering rack, and better stock tires. Truth, deal with it.
Previous STi's were always faster than evos stock for stock. Nobody was able to reproduce the times the mag testers got for evos, now that was some juiced cars for preproduction testing.
The only thing the evo has over the STi is a nice steering rack, and better stock tires. Truth, deal with it.
Your name say it all! TROLL! Did you look at the dyno references I posted? No, I didn't think so! Manufacturers came up with their own numbers previously, now they have a standard to test to, IF they want to be certified numbers, that's the difference. Idiot!
If you look at the dyno sheet, you will see that the Evo is putting out a higher HP # than the STi. The Evo is only down by 1ft/lbs on the same dyno sheet. They're both AWD so you can't justify the STi claiming 300hp/300tq on drivetrain loss.
Simple fact: Subaru inflated their HP/TQ #s.
Simple fact: Subaru inflated their HP/TQ #s.
Originally Posted by STISTL
Boost controller and no engine managment that's why there were so slow. With those mods the car pulls timing like crazy. But hey a win is a win
.
(almost) ANYBODY that owns an STi/STI knows a boost controller is a huge no-no. If he's that stupid, he deserves to have a car that runs like crap.
Originally Posted by Trollski
I can't believe the unchecked ignorance spewed on this site. The cars rating was accurate by the old standards of testing, now they are still accurate by the new standards of testing. Most cars hp rating went down from what it was. Interesting nobody posts evo's new #'s.
Previous STi's were always faster than evos stock for stock. Nobody was able to reproduce the times the mag testers got for evos, now that was some juiced cars for preproduction testing.
The only thing the evo has over the STi is a nice steering rack, and better stock tires. Truth, deal with it.
Previous STi's were always faster than evos stock for stock. Nobody was able to reproduce the times the mag testers got for evos, now that was some juiced cars for preproduction testing.
The only thing the evo has over the STi is a nice steering rack, and better stock tires. Truth, deal with it.
Yeah, the Evo does have a quicker steering rack, which is obviously going to assist in handling, and the tires are nice too, but the suspension is also better than that on the STi. In order to get a (pre 2006) STi to handle nearly as well as an Evo, AT THE LEAST, an anti-lift kit is needed. Take an STi through a corner and nail the gas in mid-corner, the car shoots wide because of the front-end lift. The tires just hunt for traction.
You, sir, are a very confused individual. You have no idea of what you are talking about, and this is coming from an STi owner.
This is off topic but ever since I got the 06 STI, I have been on the suby forums.
What I have notice is that MAN suby owners do not have taste in wheels!!! OMG, a $31K car, they put some cheap *** ugly looking wheels. Kinda sad....
Evo owners have more taste, no doubt.
What I have notice is that MAN suby owners do not have taste in wheels!!! OMG, a $31K car, they put some cheap *** ugly looking wheels. Kinda sad....
Evo owners have more taste, no doubt.
Originally Posted by AzBlackEvo8
This is off topic but ever since I got the 06 STI, I have been on the suby forums.
What I have notice is that MAN suby owners do not have taste in wheels!!! OMG, a $31K car, they put some cheap *** ugly looking wheels. Kinda sad....
Evo owners have more taste, no doubt.
What I have notice is that MAN suby owners do not have taste in wheels!!! OMG, a $31K car, they put some cheap *** ugly looking wheels. Kinda sad....
Evo owners have more taste, no doubt.
Originally Posted by Trollski
Interesting nobody posts evo's new #'s.
Or were you just making stuff up?



