Think twice before you say: best bang for your buck for $30k
Apr 12, 2009, 04:41 PM
#33
Edmunds is showing 28.8k invoice. If anyone is able to get one at this price I will jump on the bandwagon hell I was on the wagon when I heard its going to be 31k. And the ls3 has endless aftermarket support. Def top 5 for most performance for the dollar.
Apr 12, 2009, 08:35 PM
#34
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is the first car since the evo ix that i've said to myself: i'd really consider buying it.
I saw a few at sema and then one driving down the road in chicago.
This is going to be a monster in a straight line.
I saw a few at sema and then one driving down the road in chicago.
This is going to be a monster in a straight line.
Apr 12, 2009, 09:15 PM
#35
Evolving Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
A RWD muscle car, how exciting, never seen one before. Fact is they're worthless in winter, I'll go ahead and keep my EVO as it's pretty much ideal for a daily driver. (The 3 inches of snow on my deck are a nice reminder.)
Apr 12, 2009, 10:34 PM
#38
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Barstow, Cali
Posts: 423
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know that I could buy ANY product being put out by Government Motors these days. Who's to know who your warranty will be through next month...or if anybody will be honoring it at all?? Skittish man....
Apr 13, 2009, 09:29 AM
#41
As do I, as far as looks go. Unfortunately, they're currently only auto and weigh near 4,000 pounds. Hennessey was only able to get it to trap 121mph with their turbo kit. When I went to look at one, the dealer was not budging on the 45k sticker on a car that's a year old. But the looks are amazing.
Apr 13, 2009, 10:45 AM
#42
My 1st car was a 1969 Camaro so the 2010 is full of win to me , love the looks and the ls3 ant bad either .
invoice + $500 in ny
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12624
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=12624
Apr 13, 2009, 05:54 PM
#43
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NY/Central NJ
Posts: 928
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Wow.
I didn't know GM would price the SS version so cheap.
The car certainly meets the "bang for the buck" criteria.
Now I'm curious how Ford will combat this car...........
The Mustang GT's 4.6 V8 is not enough; time to bring out the 5.0 V8.
I didn't know GM would price the SS version so cheap.
The car certainly meets the "bang for the buck" criteria.
Now I'm curious how Ford will combat this car...........
The Mustang GT's 4.6 V8 is not enough; time to bring out the 5.0 V8.
Apr 13, 2009, 06:08 PM
#45
That's a very valid concern. I heard the same things about mitsu when I bought my Evo shortly after their bailout in 04 but just kind of shrugged it off. Seems the same could be a concern now as well. My largest concerns lie in parts availability rather than warranty services though.