S2000 VS all...
#1
S2000 VS all...
I know there are former s2000 owners on here. I was looking on there forum, in s2000
VS all..and it seems those cars can beat just about anything on the road. I'm not just talking about other hondas, but new 5.0 mustangs, cobras, sti, Evos, and even ferraris and porsches! A lot of these guys claim they are beating these cars with bolt on mods and of course superchargers and turbos. What do you guys think? Especially former owners. Here is the link.
http://www.s2ki.com/s2000/forum/34-s...et-encounters/
N
VS all..and it seems those cars can beat just about anything on the road. I'm not just talking about other hondas, but new 5.0 mustangs, cobras, sti, Evos, and even ferraris and porsches! A lot of these guys claim they are beating these cars with bolt on mods and of course superchargers and turbos. What do you guys think? Especially former owners. Here is the link.
http://www.s2ki.com/s2000/forum/34-s...et-encounters/
N
#4
Evolved Member
iTrader: (19)
The S2000 is a capable car with good aftermarket support.
Stock vs stock, its clear the S2000 does not beat the world.
Once you open the door to modification it really becomes about how much you spend and what your goals are. Throwing a turbo on and making high horsepower on a honda is nothing new. Civics have been doing it for years.
It really just comes down to what platform you want to start from.
To me 4g63>F22C & awd>rwd = Evo>S2000.
Stock vs stock, its clear the S2000 does not beat the world.
Once you open the door to modification it really becomes about how much you spend and what your goals are. Throwing a turbo on and making high horsepower on a honda is nothing new. Civics have been doing it for years.
It really just comes down to what platform you want to start from.
To me 4g63>F22C & awd>rwd = Evo>S2000.
#6
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
I know there are former s2000 owners on here. I was looking on there forum, in s2000
VS all..and it seems those cars can beat just about anything on the road. I'm not just talking about other hondas, but new 5.0 mustangs, cobras, sti, Evos, and even ferraris and porsches! A lot of these guys claim they are beating these cars with bolt on mods and of course superchargers and turbos. What do you guys think? Especially former owners. Here is the link.
http://www.s2ki.com/s2000/forum/34-s...et-encounters/
N
VS all..and it seems those cars can beat just about anything on the road. I'm not just talking about other hondas, but new 5.0 mustangs, cobras, sti, Evos, and even ferraris and porsches! A lot of these guys claim they are beating these cars with bolt on mods and of course superchargers and turbos. What do you guys think? Especially former owners. Here is the link.
http://www.s2ki.com/s2000/forum/34-s...et-encounters/
N
Very much this.
If you're strictly looking for straight line speed and ease of gaining power, I can't really argue. But the S2000 does a lot of things well that the Evo doesn't... including look good
#8
Evolving Member
iTrader: (47)
Dollar per dollar, you gotta spend more dollars on the S2 to have it beat an Evo/STi. Also, you have to take into consideration what form of competition 2 cars are going up against each other.. You can drop a turbo'd H22 into a $500 CRX & have it beat on Ferrari's or Lambo's, but the only thing that thing will be competetive in is the 1/4 mile. Any other aspect, there's just no competition. With the S2, the stock motor is very high strung. Honda did everything they could to squeeze every last horsepower out of that engine. For example, there are dyno tests that show some aftermarket exhausts make you LOSE horsepower over the stock exhaust! Forced induction is the only way to make any serious power, & that won't be cheap! After considerable thousands, you have an S2 that can accelerate great, but everything else is stock. More thousands to spend..
#9
Evolved Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: phoenix
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are upgrade paths to 400 rwhp, but I wouldn't call them "relatively easy", since it is one of the hardest engines to get more power out of (short of a supercharger/turbo). Modding an S2000 reliably to this level also isn't even close to what I'd call 'cheap' even with the aftermarket support it has.
A Miata will be better in almost all respects across the board - after market support, modability, reliability with mods, and cheap to mod.
S2000 does look better, I'll give you that. If I owned an S2000 I would just appreciate the motor in it's stock form. It's very much a Formula 1 inspired engine and honestly the S2000 is decently fast stock. Having no torque is just part of the fun
#11
Evolved Member
iTrader: (26)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,414
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't think that's true at all. The S2000 motor is pretty well maxed from the factory. It's not like an Evo where an ECU flash will net you 30+ whp for free. Try getting 30 rwhp out of an S2000 without adding a turbo/super.
There are upgrade paths to 400 rwhp, but I wouldn't call them "relatively easy", since it is one of the hardest engines to get more power out of (short of a supercharger/turbo). Modding an S2000 reliably to this level also isn't even close to what I'd call 'cheap' even with the aftermarket support it has.
A Miata will be better in almost all respects across the board - after market support, modability, reliability with mods, and cheap to mod.
S2000 does look better, I'll give you that. If I owned an S2000 I would just appreciate the motor in it's stock form. It's very much a Formula 1 inspired engine and honestly the S2000 is decently fast stock. Having no torque is just part of the fun
There are upgrade paths to 400 rwhp, but I wouldn't call them "relatively easy", since it is one of the hardest engines to get more power out of (short of a supercharger/turbo). Modding an S2000 reliably to this level also isn't even close to what I'd call 'cheap' even with the aftermarket support it has.
A Miata will be better in almost all respects across the board - after market support, modability, reliability with mods, and cheap to mod.
S2000 does look better, I'll give you that. If I owned an S2000 I would just appreciate the motor in it's stock form. It's very much a Formula 1 inspired engine and honestly the S2000 is decently fast stock. Having no torque is just part of the fun
This^^^.
1. It takes a lot more money to make 400whp with an S2000 than an Evo, or 5.0
2. After you make the power, you don't have traction
3. S2000 power curves, even under boost, are sooo weak compared to, let's say, an evo.
$ for $, an S2000's are actually pretty weak. And with enough money, you can make anything fast. Sure they can make high hp numbers with a stock block, but it's only because the tq is so damn low...... So yeah, imo, the people on those forums have no clue what they're talking about. Boost a new 5.0 and watch it destroy you.
Last edited by Carloverx; Jun 30, 2011 at 12:51 PM.
#13
El Jefe
iTrader: (1)
I don't think that's true at all. The S2000 motor is pretty well maxed from the factory. It's not like an Evo where an ECU flash will net you 30+ whp for free. Try getting 30 rwhp out of an S2000 without adding a turbo/super.
There are upgrade paths to 400 rwhp, but I wouldn't call them "relatively easy", since it is one of the hardest engines to get more power out of (short of a supercharger/turbo). Modding an S2000 reliably to this level also isn't even close to what I'd call 'cheap' even with the aftermarket support it has.
A Miata will be better in almost all respects across the board - after market support, modability, reliability with mods, and cheap to mod.
S2000 does look better, I'll give you that. If I owned an S2000 I would just appreciate the motor in it's stock form. It's very much a Formula 1 inspired engine and honestly the S2000 is decently fast stock. Having no torque is just part of the fun
There are upgrade paths to 400 rwhp, but I wouldn't call them "relatively easy", since it is one of the hardest engines to get more power out of (short of a supercharger/turbo). Modding an S2000 reliably to this level also isn't even close to what I'd call 'cheap' even with the aftermarket support it has.
A Miata will be better in almost all respects across the board - after market support, modability, reliability with mods, and cheap to mod.
S2000 does look better, I'll give you that. If I owned an S2000 I would just appreciate the motor in it's stock form. It's very much a Formula 1 inspired engine and honestly the S2000 is decently fast stock. Having no torque is just part of the fun
There's no doubt that the 4G63 offers upgrade paths that the S2000 doesn't - something to be said for an iron block with a relatively short stroke from the factory. However, much like the Evo crowd, most of the street racing bragadouchebags in S2000 land are beating stock/lightly modified high end cars. How hard is it to beat a stock 911 turbo in a street race? How hard is it to beat a lightly modified 5.0 mustang or stock-ish Cobra in the 1/4? Honestly it's not hard if you throw money at the problem. These guys aren't comparing $ spent to $ spent. It's just dick waving.
And at the end of the day... the guys with the big dicks don't brag.