Post a cars that should or shouldnt have a body kit!
why why. is it just a show car or does it actually have some performance mods?
Now ths is beautiful!!!
Trending Topics
Aug 14, 2002, 11:07 PM
#8
No car should have a body kit. Nothing looks worse than a 4-5 year old car with a 4-5 year old body kit. It is a paint checking, peeling, fading mess. Most fit badly when installed and get worse with age. Generally it destroys the value of the car.
Erik
Erik
Aug 15, 2002, 12:07 AM
#9
Evolved Member
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: St. Paul, MN
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by erikgj
No car should have a body kit. Nothing looks worse than a 4-5 year old car with a 4-5 year old body kit. It is a paint checking, peeling, fading mess. Most fit badly when installed and get worse with age. Generally it destroys the value of the car.
Erik
No car should have a body kit. Nothing looks worse than a 4-5 year old car with a 4-5 year old body kit. It is a paint checking, peeling, fading mess. Most fit badly when installed and get worse with age. Generally it destroys the value of the car.
Erik
There's a lot of cars that I think look GREAT with bodykits, and trust me....I'm the biggest anti-ricer to ever grace the planet.
EvoHunta...I think that kit looks very good....nice choice
Hooby
Aug 16, 2002, 11:06 PM
#12
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: North Haven, CT
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Hooby, you have no idea how many calls I get a day for the front bumper off my spec v, so many people want it to install on their regular sentra or some kid wants to modify it to fit his civic, its really a smaller version of the Skyline. Everything about it is a smaller scaled version of the skyline. But the seats and transmission are the same used in the skyline.
