Notices
The Loft / EvoM Car Talk Corner The landing pad for automotive discussions, news, articles, and opinions. A place for the community to kick back and chat.

CTR, Golf R, STI, EVO - Can I pick your Brain?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 31, 2019 | 02:49 PM
  #31  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
That CTR is legit.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 08:17 AM
  #32  
evoforstevo's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 511
Likes: 3
From: Midwest
Originally Posted by BluEVOIX
From what I have learned about performance cars.

1. Under no circumstances will I ever want a front wheel drive performance car. Terrible memories of the past owning Sentra, SRT-4 etc.. search for traction and wheel hop problems etc... There were things that can be done to gain more traction and reduce wheel hop but the negatives side effects of those mods just brought about new unwanted side effects . My first preference is AWD and if that is not possible then rear wheel drive.
.
Just want to put it out on record that the cars you quoted have been obsolete for 15 years. Tech has come a hell of a long ways since then. The MK6+ GTI is one of the best all-round cars money can buy. I have about 100hp over stock, with good tires, and I have never once experienced wheel hop. I launch the **** outta the DSG and it's held up wonderfully for my 60k miles of ownership (purchased with 73k miles, btw). With the pilot super sports, I never really want for traction.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 11:02 AM
  #33  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Plus, FWD cars aren't really meant to have silly horsepower. I.E. in my drag racing days, we had Civics and Integras with anywhere from 300-650whp. We did it because of the challenge. Definitely not because it was the fastest or easiest way to do things We recognized we were fighting an uphill battle but it was fun.
Expecting a FWD to do well with a bunch of power is unrealistic. That being said, I think Honda has done something remarkable in regards to making this car drive so well and be FAST. I mean, like, all-around fast. Quarter mile is irrelevant here.
If someone is looking to run 10s, impress their friends with dyno numbers, or roll race on the freeway, this car is not for them. For someone looking to mod the crap out of a car and get the most WHP out of it.. probably also not. They should look elsewhere.
For what this car is meant to be, I think Honda hit a home run. Not easy for me to say, as I miss the old N/A days of revving to 9k. The looks are subjective, but growing on me, especially after seeing a few in person.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 11:08 AM
  #34  
jayevo23's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 606
Likes: 14
From: Philly
Originally Posted by kaj
Plus, FWD cars aren't really meant to have silly horsepower. I.E. in my drag racing days, we had Civics and Integras with anywhere from 300-650whp. We did it because of the challenge. Definitely not because it was the fastest or easiest way to do things We recognized we were fighting an uphill battle but it was fun.
Expecting a FWD to do well with a bunch of power is unrealistic. That being said, I think Honda has done something remarkable in regards to making this car drive so well and be FAST. I mean, like, all-around fast. Quarter mile is irrelevant here.
If someone is looking to run 10s, impress their friends with dyno numbers, or roll race on the freeway, this car is not for them. For someone looking to mod the crap out of a car and get the most WHP out of it.. probably also not. They should look elsewhere.
For what this car is meant to be, I think Honda hit a home run. Not easy for me to say, as I miss the old N/A days of revving to 9k. The looks are subjective, but growing on me, especially after seeing a few in person.
Idk, from a roll they're pretty quick to my understanding. A guy said he pulled on I believe a C63 AMG from a roll from with a stage 1 Ktuner twice.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 11:12 AM
  #35  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by jayevo23
Idk, from a roll they're pretty quick to my understanding. A guy said he pulled on I believe a C63 AMG from a roll from with a stage 1 Ktuner twice.
I'd consider that a bonus.

Also, kinda funny and related: I drove the Evo the other night to test some stuff. A Camaro was messing with me while getting on the freeway. Once the on ramp straightened out, he gunned it (of course he wouldn't try that while turning LOL). Anyway, I gave chase, turned on my signal and then passed him. I bet he wasn't too happy about that. Not bad for a road race car.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 03:39 PM
  #36  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by jayevo23
Idk, from a roll they're pretty quick to my understanding. A guy said he pulled on I believe a C63 AMG from a roll from with a stage 1 Ktuner twice.
lmao. A stock 1st gen C63 AMG does mid to low 12's at over 115mph. A stock Type R does maybe mid 13's at 105mph.

Going to need more than 50whp to gain 10mph in traps.
Reply
Old Feb 1, 2019 | 06:37 PM
  #37  
moparfan's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 1,066
Likes: 29
From: Tri-State NY/NJ/CT
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 06:43 AM
  #38  
ace75's Avatar
Newbie
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 92
Likes: 1
From: Cali
I think the next gen golf r might be worth waiting for. Theres supposed to be a big bump in hp. I’m thinking they might use the rs3 engine since they both have the same basic platform.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 08:50 AM
  #39  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 137
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by razorlab
lmao. A stock 1st gen C63 AMG does mid to low 12's at over 115mph. A stock Type R does maybe mid 13's at 105mph.

Going to need more than 50whp to gain 10mph in traps.
I’ve seen as low as 102 and as high as 108 stock, but agree it isn’t pulling a C63 AMG with stage 1.

There’s an FBO car in PR trapping mid-high 1-teens, but already at fuel system limits with the smallish stock turbo and pump fuel. Sad.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 09:54 AM
  #40  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by ace75
I think the next gen golf r might be worth waiting for. Theres supposed to be a big bump in hp. I’m thinking they might use the rs3 engine since they both have the same basic platform.
Not gonna happen. Golf R is already 40k. The more exotic RS3/TTRS 5cyl would bump the price wayyyy higher.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 01:44 PM
  #41  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by Noize


I’ve seen as low as 102 and as high as 108 stock, but agree it isn’t pulling a C63 AMG with stage 1.

There’s an FBO car in PR trapping mid-high 1-teens, but already at fuel system limits with the smallish stock turbo and pump fuel. Sad.
Why sad? For a car not meant for drag racing, that sounds respectable to me.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 02:57 PM
  #42  
RazorLab's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,092
Likes: 1,090
From: Mid-Hudson, NY
Originally Posted by kaj
Why sad? For a car not meant for drag racing, that sounds respectable to me.
I believe he is stating the car is already at some maximums with the stage 1 tune. Welcome to DI fueling.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 02:59 PM
  #43  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 137
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by kaj
Why sad? For a car not meant for drag racing, that sounds respectable to me.
Because there’s not a current path to high horsepower. Coming out of an Evo X and Golf R, all you had to do was snap your fingers (and swipe your debit card). The K20C1 is going to be lots more tricky and expensive.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 03:43 PM
  #44  
kaj's Avatar
kaj
EvoM Community Team Leader
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (60)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 13,632
Likes: 824
From: Fresno, CA
Originally Posted by Noize


Because there’s not a current path to high horsepower. Coming out of an Evo X and Golf R, all you had to do was snap your fingers (and swipe your debit card). The K20C1 is going to be lots more tricky and expensive.
I gotcha. Yeah ,for someone needing a car with lots o' power, they'll need to go another route.
Honestly, I'm kinda glad I'm no longer on that path. It opens up a lot more possibilities. Plus, I spend less money and time working on the car.
Reply
Old Feb 2, 2019 | 05:40 PM
  #45  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 137
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by kaj
I gotcha. Yeah ,for someone needing a car with lots o' power, they'll need to go another route.
Honestly, I'm kinda glad I'm no longer on that path. It opens up a lot more possibilities. Plus, I spend less money and time working on the car.
Totally agree. I have no intention to mod it yet. There aren’t any Bryans or Jons tuning the US CTR at this time. Though I did find a great guy in the UK, that’s not helping me too much across the pond.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:49 PM.