Notices
ECU Flash

New Logs - These Seem Better Except One

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 10:44 AM
  #1  
kapolani's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
New Logs - These Seem Better Except One

These runs were done back to back.

Run One: Seems fine.

Code:
RPM	TPSKnockSum	TimingAdv
2562.5	32	0	26
2562.5	38	0	24
2593.75	46	0	18
2625	50	0	17
2625	54	0	15
2656.25	57	0	13
2687.5	59	0	12
2687.5	61	0	10
2718.75	72	0	10
2750	85	0	9
2750	96	0	10
2781.25	100	0	9
2812.5	100	0	9
2843.75	100	0	8
2843.75	100	0	8
2875	100	0	8
2906.25	100	0	8
2937.5	100	0	8
2968.75	100	0	8
3000	100	0	8
3062.5	100	0	8
3093.75	100	0	8
3125	100	0	8
3156.25	100	0	8
3187.5	100	0	8
3250	100	0	8
3281.25	100	0	8
3343.75	100	0	8
3406.25	100	0	8
3437.5	100	2	7
3500	100	2	7
3531.25	100	2	7
3593.75	100	1	8
3656.25	100	1	8
3687.5	100	1	8
3750	100	1	8
3812.5	100	1	8
3875	100	1	8
3906.25	100	1	8
3968.75	100	1	8
4031.25	100	1	8
4062.5	100	1	8
4093.75	100	1	8
4187.5	100	1	8
4218.75	100	0	8
4281.25	100	0	8
4343.75	100	0	8
4375	100	0	8
4437.5	100	0	8
4500	100	0	8
4531.25	100	0	8
4562.5	100	0	8
4625	100	0	8
4687.5	100	0	8
4718.75	100	0	8
4750	100	0	8
4812.5	100	0	8
4875	100	0	8
4906.25	100	0	8
4937.5	100	0	8
5000	100	0	8
5031.25	100	0	8
5093.75	100	0	8
5125	100	0	8
5187.5	100	0	8
5250	100	0	9
5281.25	100	0	9
5343.75	100	0	9
5375	100	0	9
5437.5	100	0	9
5468.75	100	0	9
5500	100	0	9
5531.25	100	0	9
5593.75	100	0	9
5625	100	0	9
5687.5	100	0	9
5718.75	100	0	9
5781.25	100	0	9
5812.5	100	0	9
5875	100	0	9
5906.25	100	0	9
5937.5	100	0	9
6000	100	0	9
6031.25	100	0	9
6093.75	100	0	9
6125	100	0	10
6156.25	100	0	10
6187.5	100	0	10
6250	100	0	10
6281.25	100	0	10
6312.5	100	0	10
6343.75	100	0	10
6406.25	100	0	11
6437.5	100	0	11
6468.75	100	0	11
6531.25	100	0	11
6531.25	100	0	11
6593.75	100	0	11
6625	100	0	12
6656.25	100	0	12
6718.75	100	0	12
6750	100	0	12
6781.25	100	0	12
6812.5	100	0	12
6843.75	100	0	12
6906.25	100	0	13
6906.25	100	0	13
6937.5	100	0	13
7000	100	0	13
7031.25	100	0	13
7062.5	100	0	14
7093.75	100	0	14
7125	100	0	14
7156.25	100	0	14
7218.75	100	0	16
7218.75	100	0	16
7250	100	0	16
7312.5	100	0	17
7312.5	100	0	17
7375	100	1	16
7406.25	100	1	16
7406.25	100	1	17
7468.75	100	1	17
7500	100	0	18
7500	100	0	18
7531.25	100	0	18
7562.5	100	0	18
7593.75	96	0	18
Run Two: Seems like there's some severe knock going on

Code:
RPM	TPSKnockSum	TimingAdv
2500	43	4	20
2531.25	93	4	14
2562.5	100	4	11
2562.5	100	4	10
2593.75	100	9	8
2625	100	9	7
2625	100	8	6
2656.25	100	8	6
2687.5	100	8	6
2687.5	100	8	6
2750	100	8	4
2750	100	8	4
2781.25	100	8	4
2812.5	100	8	4
2843.75	100	8	4
2843.75	100	8	4
2906.25	100	8	4
2937.5	100	8	4
2968.75	100	8	4
3000	100	7	4
3031.25	100	7	4
3062.5	100	7	4
3125	100	7	4
3156.25	100	7	4
3187.5	100	7	4
3250	100	7	4
3281.25	100	7	4
3343.75	100	7	4
3406.25	100	7	4
3437.5	100	7	4
3500	100	7	4
3531.25	100	7	4
3562.5	100	6	5
3656.25	100	6	5
3656.25	100	6	5
3718.75	100	6	5
3781.25	100	6	5
3781.25	100	6	5
3843.75	100	6	5
3906.25	100	6	5
3937.5	100	6	5
3968.75	100	6	5
4031.25	100	6	5
4062.5	100	6	5
4093.75	100	6	5
4187.5	100	6	5
4187.5	100	5	5
4250	100	5	5
4281.25	100	5	5
4375	100	5	5
4406.25	100	5	5
4437.5	100	5	5
4468.75	100	5	5
4531.25	100	5	5
4593.75	100	5	5
4625	100	5	5
4656.25	100	5	5
4718.75	100	5	5
4750	100	5	5
4812.5	100	5	5
4875	100	4	5
4906.25	100	4	5
4937.5	100	4	5
5000	100	4	5
5031.25	100	4	5
5093.75	100	4	5
5125	100	4	5
5156.25	100	4	5
5218.75	100	4	7
5250	100	4	7
5281.25	100	4	7
5343.75	100	4	7
5375	100	4	7
5437.5	100	3	7
5500	100	3	7
5531.25	100	3	7
5562.5	100	3	7
5625	100	3	7
5656.25	100	3	7
5718.75	100	3	7
5718.75	100	3	7
5781.25	100	3	7
5812.5	100	3	7
5875	100	3	7
5906.25	100	3	7
5937.5	100	3	7
6000	100	2	7
6031.25	100	2	7
6062.5	100	2	7
6093.75	100	2	8
6156.25	100	2	8
6218.75	100	2	8
6250	100	2	8
6281.25	100	2	8
6312.5	100	2	8
6343.75	100	2	8
6406.25	100	2	9
6406.25	100	2	9
6468.75	100	2	9
6468.75	100	1	9
6562.5	100	1	9
6562.5	100	1	9
6625	100	1	10
6656.25	100	1	10
6687.5	100	1	10
6750	100	1	10
6750	100	1	10
6781.25	100	1	10
6812.5	100	1	10
6843.75	100	1	10
6875	100	1	11
6906.25	100	1	11
6937.5	100	0	12
7000	100	0	12
7000	100	0	12
7062.5	100	0	14
7093.75	100	0	14
7125	100	0	14
7156.25	100	0	14
7187.5	100	0	15
7218.75	100	0	16
7250	100	0	16
7281.25	100	0	16
7312.5	100	0	17
7343.75	100	1	16
7375	100	0	17
7406.25	100	0	17
7437.5	100	0	18
7468.75	100	0	18
7500	100	0	18
7531.25	100	0	18
7562.5	100	0	18
7593.75	100	0	18
7625	100	0	18
7656.25	30	0	26
Run Three: Seems fine again.

Code:
RPM	TPSKnockSum	TimingAdv
2593.75	37	0	16
2625	61	0	11
2625	100	0	9
2656.25	100	0	9
2687.5	100	0	8
2718.75	100	0	8
2750	100	0	8
2750	100	0	8
2781.25	100	0	8
2812.5	100	0	8
2843.75	100	0	8
2906.25	100	0	8
2906.25	100	0	8
2968.75	100	0	8
3000	100	0	8
3031.25	100	0	8
3062.5	100	0	8
3125	100	0	8
3156.25	100	0	8
3218.75	100	0	8
3250	100	0	8
3312.5	100	0	8
3343.75	100	0	8
3406.25	100	1	8
3437.5	100	1	8
3500	100	0	8
3562.5	100	0	8
3593.75	100	0	8
3656.25	100	0	8
3718.75	100	0	8
3781.25	100	0	8
3812.5	100	0	8
3875	100	0	8
3906.25	100	0	8
3968.75	100	0	8
4031.25	100	0	8
4062.5	100	0	8
4125	100	0	8
4156.25	100	0	8
4187.5	100	0	8
4281.25	100	0	8
4312.5	100	0	8
4375	100	0	8
4406.25	100	0	8
4468.75	100	0	8
4500	100	0	8
4531.25	100	0	8
4625	100	0	8
4656.25	100	0	8
4687.5	100	0	8
4750	100	0	8
4781.25	100	0	8
4843.75	100	0	8
4906.25	100	0	8
4937.5	100	0	8
4968.75	100	0	8
5062.5	100	0	8
5062.5	100	0	8
5125	100	0	8
5187.5	100	0	8
5218.75	100	0	8
5281.25	100	0	9
5312.5	100	0	9
5343.75	100	0	9
5406.25	100	0	9
5437.5	100	0	9
5500	100	0	9
5531.25	100	0	9
5593.75	100	0	9
5656.25	100	0	9
5656.25	100	0	9
5718.75	100	0	9
5750	100	0	9
5812.5	100	0	9
5843.75	100	0	9
5875	100	0	9
5937.5	100	0	9
5968.75	100	0	9
6000	100	0	9
6062.5	100	0	9
6093.75	100	0	9
6125	100	0	10
6156.25	100	0	10
6187.5	100	0	10
6250	100	2	9
6281.25	100	2	9
6312.5	100	2	9
6343.75	100	2	9
6406.25	100	2	10
6437.5	100	2	10
6468.75	100	1	10
6531.25	100	1	10
6531.25	100	1	10
6593.75	100	1	10
6625	100	1	11
6656.25	100	1	11
6687.5	100	1	11
6750	100	1	11
6750	100	1	11
6781.25	100	1	11
6843.75	100	1	11
6843.75	100	1	12
6906.25	100	1	12
6937.5	100	0	13
6968.75	100	0	13
7000	100	0	13
7031.25	100	0	14
7062.5	100	0	14
7093.75	100	0	14
7156.25	100	1	14
7187.5	100	1	15
7218.75	100	1	15
7218.75	100	1	15
7281.25	100	1	15
7312.5	100	1	16
7343.75	100	1	16
7375	100	0	17
7406.25	100	0	17
7437.5	100	0	18
7468.75	100	0	18
7500	100	0	18
7500	100	0	18
7562.5	100	0	18
7562.5	100	0	18
7625	100	0	18
7625	100	0	18
7687.5	78	0	18
Run four: There is some knock present when not WOT.
Code:
RPM	TPS	KnockSum	TimingAdv
2406.25	32	2	22
2437.5	32	2	22
2468.75	32	2	22
2500	32	4	21
2531.25	32	4	21
2562.5	31	4	21
2593.75	31	4	22
2625	31	4	23
2656.25	31	4	25
2656.25	31	4	23
2687.5	31	4	23
2718.75	31	4	23
2750	31	3	26
2781.25	31	3	26
2781.25	31	3	24
2843.75	31	3	26
2843.75	31	3	25
2875	31	3	27
2906.25	31	3	26
2937.5	31	3	26
2937.5	31	3	28
3000	31	3	28
3031.25	31	3	28
3031.25	30	3	26
.
.
.
.
.
2562.5	100	2	13
2593.75	100	2	13
2625	100	2	11
2625	100	2	10
2687.5	100	1	9
2687.5	100	1	9
2718.75	100	1	8
2750	100	1	8
2781.25	100	1	8
2812.5	100	1	8
2812.5	100	1	8
2843.75	100	1	8
2875	100	1	8
2906.25	100	1	8
2968.75	100	1	8
3000	100	1	8
3031.25	100	1	8
3062.5	100	0	8
3093.75	100	0	8
3125	100	0	8
3187.5	100	0	8
3218.75	100	0	8
3281.25	100	0	8
3343.75	100	0	8
3375	100	0	8
3406.25	100	0	8
3468.75	100	3	8
3531.25	100	3	7
3593.75	100	3	7
3656.25	100	3	7
3687.5	100	2	7
3750	100	2	7
3781.25	100	2	7
3843.75	100	2	7
3906.25	100	2	7
3968.75	100	2	7
4000	100	2	7
4062.5	100	2	7
4125	100	2	7
4156.25	100	2	7
4218.75	100	2	7
4281.25	100	2	7
4312.5	100	2	7
4375	100	1	8
4406.25	100	1	8
4468.75	100	1	8
4531.25	100	1	8
4562.5	100	1	8
4625	100	1	8
4656.25	100	1	8
4718.75	100	1	8
4781.25	100	1	8
4812.5	100	1	8
4875	100	1	8
4906.25	100	1	8
4968.75	100	1	8
5031.25	100	0	8
5062.5	100	0	8
5125	100	0	8
5156.25	100	0	8
5218.75	100	0	8
5250	100	0	9
5281.25	100	0	9
5343.75	100	0	9
5406.25	100	0	9
5437.5	100	0	9
5500	100	0	9
5531.25	100	0	9
5593.75	100	0	9
5625	100	0	9
5656.25	100	0	9
5687.5	100	0	9
5750	100	0	9
5812.5	100	0	9
5843.75	100	0	9
5875	100	0	9
5937.5	100	0	9
5968.75	100	0	9
6000	100	0	9
6031.25	100	0	9
6093.75	100	0	9
6125	100	0	10
6156.25	100	0	10
6187.5	100	0	10
6250	100	0	10
6281.25	100	0	10
6343.75	100	0	10
6343.75	100	0	10
6406.25	100	0	11
6437.5	100	0	11
6468.75	100	0	11
6500	100	0	11
6531.25	100	0	11
6562.5	100	0	11
6625	100	0	12
6656.25	100	0	12
6687.5	100	0	12
6718.75	100	0	12
6750	100	0	12
6781.25	100	0	12
6843.75	100	0	12
6875	100	0	13
6906.25	100	0	13
6937.5	100	0	13
6968.75	100	0	13
7000	100	0	13
7031.25	100	0	13
7062.5	100	0	14
7125	100	0	14
7156.25	100	0	14
7187.5	100	0	14
7187.5	100	0	15
7218.75	100	0	15
7281.25	100	0	16
7312.5	100	0	17
7343.75	100	0	17
7375	100	0	17
7406.25	100	0	17
7437.5	100	0	18
7468.75	100	0	18
7500	100	0	18
7531.25	100	0	18
7562.5	67	0	18
I'm curious what you all think about these pulls. I'm starting to get a grasp on what they mean through researching this board.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 10:54 AM
  #2  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Here is my opinion:

I think that running 7-8* of timing @ peak torque/boost (3500-3700 rpm) is WAY too much. The EVO 8 runs between 1-3* of timing stock in that load area and on a richer AFR no less. So your tuner leaned out the mixture AND advanced the timing to 8 in that area. That is too much and unless you are running 100 octane gas, your car is more than likely to knock.

My advice to you is to get a different tune. Get a tune either from Jestr or from TTP. I may not like Scott as a person, but he is a superb tuner. He knows what he is doing. I really doubt that Scott will run 888888 @ peak torque boost and lean out the mixture.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 11:04 AM
  #3  
kapolani's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
I'm going to get some dyno pulls next weekend to verify my AFR's.

I was unable to see the AFR's logs during my "custom tune."

It is noted, however, that the tuner commented that my AFR's were nice and flat.

But, nice and flat where?
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 11:28 AM
  #4  
kapolani's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Nice and flat, like your rod bearings when you continue to beat on 8* of ignition timing on boost spikes.

You would think after all the complaints of this timing number, "tuner A" would stop this ****ty practice of the signature 8*. Its a joke.


You's my boy NJ!
I appreciate the response.

I'm not here to bash anyone, but just to learn and maybe figure out what can be done to rectify the situation.

I've read many times before where you, and others stated that this can have severe effects on the internals of the engine.

But, I have never seen a post/case where anyone's car had blown etc.

Could you explain why this is an unsafe way to do things.

Thanks.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 11:35 AM
  #5  
BBYBruno's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
From: Eastlake, OH
I also had a custom tune from tuner A, but since I got re-reflashed from TTP I coud not be more happy with the car. Feels alot smoother and stronger. Can't wait to go to the track this weekend
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #6  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Originally Posted by kapolani
I appreciate the response.

I'm not here to bash anyone, but just to learn and maybe figure out what can be done to rectify the situation.

I've read many times before where you, and others stated that this can have severe effects on the internals of the engine.

But, I have never seen a post/case where anyone's car had blown etc.

Could you explain why this is an unsafe way to do things.

Thanks.
Its not only an unsafe practice, it is an improper way to tune.

You have 8* programmed and throughout much of the tune your knocksums are so high that you have timing pulled, leaving your effective ignition timing numbers at a level of lacking performance. Overzealous aggressive tunes do the opposite of what you want them to do. Instead of making more power, they make less power and tq than a comparable run on properly programmed ignition timing numbers.

You want the least amount of knocksums, while knowing you are at the limit where if you add another degree, you will experience knocksums. It is evident that someone crossed the line by far with ignition timing on your tune.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 11:54 AM
  #7  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Nice and flat, like your rod bearings when you continue to beat on 8* of ignition timing on boost spikes.
That made me crack up when I read it.

I agree with everyone here. You are getting most of the knock and knock onset at your peak torque region, around 3500 RPM. Lower your 8* around that area a degree or two and do some pulls.


Eric
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 11:56 AM
  #8  
kapolani's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by TTP Engineering
Its not only an unsafe practice, it is an improper way to tune.

You have 8* programmed and throughout much of the tune your knocksums are so high that you have timing pulled, leaving your effective ignition timing numbers at a level of lacking performance. Overzealous aggressive tunes do the opposite of what you want them to do. Instead of making more power, they make less power and tq than a comparable run on properly programmed ignition timing numbers.

You want the least amount of knocksums, while knowing you are at the limit where if you add another degree, you will experience knocksums. It is evident that someone crossed the line by far with ignition timing on your tune.
Okay, I can understand that.

Run number two only exhibits the excessive knock counts though. The other three do not have any.

Wouldn't they be the same throughout all logs if it were "crossing" the line?

I appreciate the responses.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #9  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Originally Posted by kapolani
Okay, I can understand that.

Run number two only exhibits the excessive knock counts though. The other three do not have any.

Wouldn't they be the same throughout all logs if it were "crossing" the line?

I appreciate the responses.
There are many, many factors that can go into producing knock from one run to the next, including but not limited to, coolant temperature, intake temperature, IC heat soak, etc, etc.

Do you want a tune that will produce no knock for one run once in a while or do you want a tune that will produce knock-free runs, run after run?


Eric
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:05 PM
  #10  
kapolani's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Originally Posted by l2r99gst
There are many, many factors that can go into producing knock from one run to the next, including but not limited to, coolant temperature, intake temperature, IC heat soak, etc, etc.

Do you want a tune that will produce no knock for one run once in a while or do you want a tune that will produce knock-free runs, run after run?


Eric
Eric -

Understood.

But, using your logic:

Originally Posted by l2r99gst
There are many, many factors that can go into producing knock from one run to the next, including but not limited to, coolant temperature, intake temperature, IC heat soak, etc, etc.
If the above is true - how can you possibly limit the above factors when tuning. Like heatsoak? Temp? etc...

It would seem virtually impossible to get that perfect tune if you were to do the above. Those variables are not static, but always changing.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:09 PM
  #11  
TTP Engineering's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (465)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 8,824
Likes: 2
From: Central FL
Part of your problem is the non progressive BLOCKING of 8* throughout the tune. The other problem is the lack of resolution in your mapping. It is a lazy tune.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #12  
l2r99gst's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,499
Likes: 4
From: CA
Originally Posted by kapolani
Eric -

Understood.

But, using your logic:



If the above is true - how can you possibly limit the above factors when tuning. Like heatsoak? Temp? etc...

It would seem virtually impossible to get that perfect tune if you were to do the above. Those variables are not static, but always changing.
Yes, you are right. But, that it why you tune to what you are going to use the car for and for the modifications that you have.

For example, if you were going to simply drag the car, then you can tune very aggressively because you just need 1 good knock free run. If you were auto-crossing, then your tune will have to be much less aggressive to take these factors into account.

Also, that's why we modify our cars....to replace the weakest link in the chain. If you IC is heat soaking, you ugrade it, etc.

But, in general, you always need to leave some wiggle room for slightly changing conditions. You may be leaving a few HP on the table, but that is in exchange for a motor with a long, healthy life.


Eric
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:22 PM
  #13  
kapolani's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
I understand you competely.

I made these four runs back to back with minimal time in between.

I would think if my tune were unsafe that I would be knocking on every pull. Not just one pull.

I'm still learning this all and appreciate your responses.
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 12:38 PM
  #14  
Mad_SB's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,138
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
So here is my 2 cents worth after dealing with a lot of knock for a long time:

Looks like you start knocking in the low rpm range around 2500 when you do. I have observed that when this happens (and it did to me a lot) the knock will stick with you through the run.

I agree with the previous comments about the lazy tune. I think you need to focus on the 80-140 area of the timing map between 2500 and 3000. Since you do not have a wideband it will be tough to tell what is going on in the AFR department in that region, you may find that tappering down the timing especially from the 100 - 140 area will be enough.

That said, once the knock is gone in that area it will probably re appear higher up in the rpm range since you may be spooling faster and hitting higher load. And at some point I'm sure you will have to adress the crazy 8's and blend those down from 200 and up between 3000 and 4000

These are only my opinions of course so don't send me a bill if it don't work :-)
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 07:04 PM
  #15  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by nj1266
I think that running 7-8* of timing @ peak torque/boost (3500-3700 rpm) is WAY too much. The EVO 8 runs between 1-3* of timing stock in that load area and on a richer AFR no less. So your tuner leaned out the mixture AND advanced the timing to 8 in that area.
This is completely untrue, and I have told you this before, but for some reason you do not listen.

The stock tune is QUITE LEAN at peak torque/boost. Have you not seen dynos showing this over and over on multiple Evos? It starts out in the 12s, then crosses into the high 11s AFTER peak torque/boost, then it falls to 11.0 or so around 5200rpm, and after that, it goes rich as hell. The stock tune is not rich through the entire powerband - it's only extremely rich at the higher rpms. So, the tune does not go leaner AND increase timing at peak torque. It just increases timing. You guys act like this is some amazingly evil thing while ignoring the tons and tons of fast cars with this tuning style and the incredibly minute cases of failures. In fact, there has been no reported engine failure confirmed to be directly attirbuted to this tuning style, and there are far more cars tuned like this than by anyone else in the Evo market.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:05 PM.