Schumacher Retires
Originally Posted by timzcat
High horse? I have been to Nascar races years ago and decided it was way too boring to stand for 5 hours. Sorry.
Originally Posted by timzcat
I understand you are from the hot bed of Nascar so I can't blame you for being so angry that some people believe it is not the best race series.
If I had to pick a "best" race series (which would be based entirely on my opinion) it would be WRC. While I do expect a Schumacher thread to be heavily F1-biased,
Name calling....
Cabo
Last edited by timzcat; Sep 14, 2006 at 09:25 AM.
Originally Posted by evo542
he can always go to WRC, but in other interviews he said no way because that's just insane form of racing 

See what I mean?
He's only good at F1. That post proves it right there.
But wait -- didn't he participate in ROC? Don't they drive rally cars in that race?
My inferior NASCAR-biased mind can't handle this any more. What to do?!? Which way is right ?
Cabo
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: In Hell, but making my way out
Why would Shumi go to NASCAR anyway, he is the highest paid racer/athlete in history because of F1 and 300 million+ fans world wide watching him. NASCAR could never offer that kind of exposure and pay. Hell, it would take most of if not all of NASCARS revenue just to pay him to sit in the car and wave. LOL 
When your at the top, there is no place to go but down and why would he do that. He has raced in the top motorsport in the world since 1991(the Pinnacle of motorsports), why would he want to step down to a lower form of racing. It would not really be a challenge or worth his time driving in a circle. It would be like being a Billionaire(which he is) and giving it all away to work at McDonalds because you never did it. Simply pointless.

When your at the top, there is no place to go but down and why would he do that. He has raced in the top motorsport in the world since 1991(the Pinnacle of motorsports), why would he want to step down to a lower form of racing. It would not really be a challenge or worth his time driving in a circle. It would be like being a Billionaire(which he is) and giving it all away to work at McDonalds because you never did it. Simply pointless.

Originally Posted by Dayton_EVO
Why would Shumi go to NASCAR anyway, he is the highest paid racer/athlete in history because of F1 and 300 million+ fans world wide watching him. NASCAR could never offer that kind of exposure and pay. Hell, it would take most of if not all of NASCARS revenue just to pay him to sit in the car and wave. LOL 
When your at the top, there is no place to go but down and why would he do that. He has raced in the top motorsport in the world since 1991(the Pinnacle of motorsports), why would he want to step down to a lower form of racing. It would not really be a challenge or worth his time driving in a circle. It would be like being a Billionaire(which he is) and giving it all away to work at McDonalds because you never did it. Simply pointless.


When your at the top, there is no place to go but down and why would he do that. He has raced in the top motorsport in the world since 1991(the Pinnacle of motorsports), why would he want to step down to a lower form of racing. It would not really be a challenge or worth his time driving in a circle. It would be like being a Billionaire(which he is) and giving it all away to work at McDonalds because you never did it. Simply pointless.


He's the Michael Jordan of motorsports -- yeah, he's good at what he does, but he's not the only one out there. I guess I just got tired of seeing and hearing about him, like I did when Jordan was popular.
Cabo
I'm glad Schumi's gone. He's a symptom of whats wrong with F1. He breaks the rules, he gets a slap on the hands. He can do so b/c he brings the fans to the stands. The last race was a bit ridiculous with Alonso being penalized for blocking. Whats the point in racing if things are so unfair?
F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports. The drivers are the best of the best. People in the lower series would give their left nut just to be a test driver.
When it comes to driving skill, how can you argue that a series that drives in circles requires even the same skill as a series that drives on the fastest road courses in the world?
I'm not trying to rain down on nascar, hell I watch nascar. Hell a friend of mine and I were looking into setting a car up to run in nascar. F1 could learn a hell of a lot from Nascar. Nascar is low tech. Not in a bad way, but in a more fair way. Not that nascar is fair, but closer to it. Nascar marketing is genius. Even the way they film and commentate. The overall message is that nascar drivers really aren't all that different from you and I.
Whats further is that theres this crazy thing that happens in nascar called "passing." I remember when there used to be a lot of that in F1 but no longer.
The bumping and rubbing in nascar is also good fun to watch. Watching those old boys running up at infineon is an absolute pleasure. Bumper cars anyone?
When I watch the F1 post race conferences its about as interesting as getting a colorectal exam without lubrication. Like watching paint dry then flake off with the passage of time would be more exciting.
All in all I'd say this: The average F1 driver will drive circles around the average nascar driver. I think the average WRC driver would drive rings around both.
While F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports, I think the best drivers in the world are in WRC. Seb Loeb/Gonholm/Petter. They drive on gravel/road/snow/mud, rain or shine, on four tires or three. Their car catches on fire? they keep going. They shatter their windshield after flipping 5 times? they kick it out and keep going. Brakes on fire? They keep going.
I love the fact that they get out of their own cars and change flats, fix anything that can be fixed to get back to service.
Plus given the fact that they're driving constantly changing and different courses means they have to adapt and extremely high rates of speed. This also makes the average wrc course the most dangerous in the world. Couple that with the layout of wrc cars, side by side driver/co-driver and the number of obstacles to hit on the average dirt road (trees,boulders,telephone poles etc) makes the car itself not as safe as it could be. RIP Beef.
F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports. The drivers are the best of the best. People in the lower series would give their left nut just to be a test driver.
When it comes to driving skill, how can you argue that a series that drives in circles requires even the same skill as a series that drives on the fastest road courses in the world?
I'm not trying to rain down on nascar, hell I watch nascar. Hell a friend of mine and I were looking into setting a car up to run in nascar. F1 could learn a hell of a lot from Nascar. Nascar is low tech. Not in a bad way, but in a more fair way. Not that nascar is fair, but closer to it. Nascar marketing is genius. Even the way they film and commentate. The overall message is that nascar drivers really aren't all that different from you and I.
Whats further is that theres this crazy thing that happens in nascar called "passing." I remember when there used to be a lot of that in F1 but no longer.
The bumping and rubbing in nascar is also good fun to watch. Watching those old boys running up at infineon is an absolute pleasure. Bumper cars anyone?
When I watch the F1 post race conferences its about as interesting as getting a colorectal exam without lubrication. Like watching paint dry then flake off with the passage of time would be more exciting.
All in all I'd say this: The average F1 driver will drive circles around the average nascar driver. I think the average WRC driver would drive rings around both.
While F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports, I think the best drivers in the world are in WRC. Seb Loeb/Gonholm/Petter. They drive on gravel/road/snow/mud, rain or shine, on four tires or three. Their car catches on fire? they keep going. They shatter their windshield after flipping 5 times? they kick it out and keep going. Brakes on fire? They keep going.
I love the fact that they get out of their own cars and change flats, fix anything that can be fixed to get back to service.
Plus given the fact that they're driving constantly changing and different courses means they have to adapt and extremely high rates of speed. This also makes the average wrc course the most dangerous in the world. Couple that with the layout of wrc cars, side by side driver/co-driver and the number of obstacles to hit on the average dirt road (trees,boulders,telephone poles etc) makes the car itself not as safe as it could be. RIP Beef.
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: In Hell, but making my way out
Originally Posted by yooyooyoo
I'm glad Schumi's gone. He's a symptom of whats wrong with F1. He breaks the rules, he gets a slap on the hands. He can do so b/c he brings the fans to the stands. The last race was a bit ridiculous with Alonso being penalized for blocking. Whats the point in racing if things are so unfair?
F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports. The drivers are the best of the best. People in the lower series would give their left nut just to be a test driver.
When it comes to driving skill, how can you argue that a series that drives in circles requires even the same skill as a series that drives on the fastest road courses in the world?
I'm not trying to rain down on nascar, hell I watch nascar. Hell a friend of mine and I were looking into setting a car up to run in nascar. F1 could learn a hell of a lot from Nascar. Nascar is low tech. Not in a bad way, but in a more fair way. Not that nascar is fair, but closer to it. Nascar marketing is genius. Even the way they film and commentate. The overall message is that nascar drivers really aren't all that different from you and I.
Whats further is that theres this crazy thing that happens in nascar called "passing." I remember when there used to be a lot of that in F1 but no longer.
The bumping and rubbing in nascar is also good fun to watch. Watching those old boys running up at infineon is an absolute pleasure. Bumper cars anyone?
When I watch the F1 post race conferences its about as interesting as getting a colorectal exam without lubrication. Like watching paint dry then flake off with the passage of time would be more exciting.
All in all I'd say this: The average F1 driver will drive circles around the average nascar driver. I think the average WRC driver would drive rings around both.
While F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports, I think the best drivers in the world are in WRC. Seb Loeb/Gonholm/Petter. They drive on gravel/road/snow/mud, rain or shine, on four tires or three. Their car catches on fire? they keep going. They shatter their windshield after flipping 5 times? they kick it out and keep going. Brakes on fire? They keep going.
I love the fact that they get out of their own cars and change flats, fix anything that can be fixed to get back to service.
Plus given the fact that they're driving constantly changing and different courses means they have to adapt and extremely high rates of speed. This also makes the average wrc course the most dangerous in the world. Couple that with the layout of wrc cars, side by side driver/co-driver and the number of obstacles to hit on the average dirt road (trees,boulders,telephone poles etc) makes the car itself not as safe as it could be. RIP Beef.
F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports. The drivers are the best of the best. People in the lower series would give their left nut just to be a test driver.
When it comes to driving skill, how can you argue that a series that drives in circles requires even the same skill as a series that drives on the fastest road courses in the world?
I'm not trying to rain down on nascar, hell I watch nascar. Hell a friend of mine and I were looking into setting a car up to run in nascar. F1 could learn a hell of a lot from Nascar. Nascar is low tech. Not in a bad way, but in a more fair way. Not that nascar is fair, but closer to it. Nascar marketing is genius. Even the way they film and commentate. The overall message is that nascar drivers really aren't all that different from you and I.
Whats further is that theres this crazy thing that happens in nascar called "passing." I remember when there used to be a lot of that in F1 but no longer.
The bumping and rubbing in nascar is also good fun to watch. Watching those old boys running up at infineon is an absolute pleasure. Bumper cars anyone?
When I watch the F1 post race conferences its about as interesting as getting a colorectal exam without lubrication. Like watching paint dry then flake off with the passage of time would be more exciting.
All in all I'd say this: The average F1 driver will drive circles around the average nascar driver. I think the average WRC driver would drive rings around both.
While F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports, I think the best drivers in the world are in WRC. Seb Loeb/Gonholm/Petter. They drive on gravel/road/snow/mud, rain or shine, on four tires or three. Their car catches on fire? they keep going. They shatter their windshield after flipping 5 times? they kick it out and keep going. Brakes on fire? They keep going.
I love the fact that they get out of their own cars and change flats, fix anything that can be fixed to get back to service.
Plus given the fact that they're driving constantly changing and different courses means they have to adapt and extremely high rates of speed. This also makes the average wrc course the most dangerous in the world. Couple that with the layout of wrc cars, side by side driver/co-driver and the number of obstacles to hit on the average dirt road (trees,boulders,telephone poles etc) makes the car itself not as safe as it could be. RIP Beef.
The FIA has an extensive history and major problems with teams that do well, so they change rules to hurt those teams. This in turn takes them down the road to ridiculous rules that make the sport very difficult and no fun to watch anymore.
Originally Posted by yooyooyoo
I'm glad Schumi's gone. He's a symptom of whats wrong with F1. He breaks the rules, he gets a slap on the hands. He can do so b/c he brings the fans to the stands. The last race was a bit ridiculous with Alonso being penalized for blocking. Whats the point in racing if things are so unfair?
Originally Posted by yooyooyoo
When it comes to driving skill, how can you argue that a series that drives in circles requires even the same skill as a series that drives on the fastest road courses in the world?
Originally Posted by yooyooyoo
Nascar marketing is genius.
Originally Posted by yooyooyoo
All in all I'd say this: The average F1 driver will drive circles around the average nascar driver. I think the average WRC driver would drive rings around both.
Originally Posted by yooyooyoo
While F1 is the pinnacle of motorsports, I think the best drivers in the world are in WRC. Seb Loeb/Gonholm/Petter. They drive on gravel/road/snow/mud, rain or shine, on four tires or three. Their car catches on fire? they keep going. They shatter their windshield after flipping 5 times? they kick it out and keep going. Brakes on fire? They keep going.
I love the fact that they get out of their own cars and change flats, fix anything that can be fixed to get back to service.
I love the fact that they get out of their own cars and change flats, fix anything that can be fixed to get back to service.
Too bad the series is governed by the FIA.
Cabo
Comparing F1 to NASCAR, now that’s a laugh! As someone said above anyone can pretty much build a NASCAR and race. People try all their lives to become F1 drivers and don’t make the cut. If you’re not one of the best in the world, you’re never going to become a F1 driver. It’s like comparing two people applying for different jobs: One person only has the skill set for a minimum wage paying job $6-7 per hour. He will never get hired for a 150+K job. Another person with the skill set for a 150+K job, is not going to leave his job and take the minimum wage job, even though he can.
Please don’t mention Montoya here
. He knew F1 didn’t want him, so he did the most idiotic thing he could… Maybe word of his temperament and bad behavior got around to other types of racing and no one wanted to hire him but NASCAR. Even with his short fuse, maybe we should just wait and see what he does at NASCAR.
What’s sad about the whole thing is there’s finally an American racing in F1. It’s a huge accomplishment to get where he is. Yet, does the average American even know he exists? No, their too busy watching NASCAR, whose pace of technology development is stuck in the dark ages.
My 4G63s:
My GVR4, My Evo8
Please don’t mention Montoya here
What’s sad about the whole thing is there’s finally an American racing in F1. It’s a huge accomplishment to get where he is. Yet, does the average American even know he exists? No, their too busy watching NASCAR, whose pace of technology development is stuck in the dark ages.
My 4G63s:
My GVR4, My Evo8
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
iTrader: (15)
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 1
From: Ft Smith, AR
Originally Posted by Slo Evo8
What’s sad about the whole thing is there’s finally an American racing in F1. It’s a huge accomplishment to get where he is. Yet, does the average American even know he exists? No, their too busy watching NASCAR, whose pace of technology development is stuck in the dark ages.
My 4G63s:
My GVR4, My Evo8
My 4G63s:
My GVR4, My Evo8
jeff
First, Cabo you are no longer welcome in this thread so do not post. I have no problem with anyone debating but when you are unable to get your point accross or have no point and resort to name calling it's time for you to leave.
You are obviously only here to instigate with everyone, therefore you are not welcome to post in this thread any longer.
Slo Evo8,
Did you ever see the video where the camera guy was too close to Montoya and he turned around and hit his head on the camera? It is hilarious, he just keeps saying "you broke my f*cking head"
You are obviously only here to instigate with everyone, therefore you are not welcome to post in this thread any longer.
Slo Evo8,
Did you ever see the video where the camera guy was too close to Montoya and he turned around and hit his head on the camera? It is hilarious, he just keeps saying "you broke my f*cking head"
Politics in F1 is I think taken out of proportions at times. Fernando go put back 10 places (actually had 3 best times deleted) for blocking Massa.
A lot of people say the FIA's biased and so on. But they had telemetry from both cars, they have video footage, explanations from both drivers and contrary to popular belief, the stewards are made up of an international group - not just Italians. So yes, I would think they can judge more fairly the situation. Besides, Alonso does have a habit of lifting off in the middle of corners to wrong foot the driver behind and the parabolica would be a good place to do it so there is substance there. Really I don't think the FIA is as biased and people think. Read interviews with Max Mosley when you have the chance and you'll find they're not as clueless as they are made out to be.
A lot of people say the FIA's biased and so on. But they had telemetry from both cars, they have video footage, explanations from both drivers and contrary to popular belief, the stewards are made up of an international group - not just Italians. So yes, I would think they can judge more fairly the situation. Besides, Alonso does have a habit of lifting off in the middle of corners to wrong foot the driver behind and the parabolica would be a good place to do it so there is substance there. Really I don't think the FIA is as biased and people think. Read interviews with Max Mosley when you have the chance and you'll find they're not as clueless as they are made out to be.
Originally Posted by timzcat
Did you ever see the video where the camera guy was too close to Montoya and he turned around and hit his head on the camera? It is hilarious, he just keeps saying "you broke my f*cking head"
As far as the Massa/Alanso incident goes, what a lot of people forget is that Alanso did give Massa a lot of slip streaming opportunities that would have helped a lot with his quali times. But without seeing everything the marshals saw, it's hard to comment.
Originally Posted by x838nwy
Politics in F1 is I think taken out of proportions at times. Fernando go put back 10 places (actually had 3 best times deleted) for blocking Massa.
A lot of people say the FIA's biased and so on. But they had telemetry from both cars, they have video footage, explanations from both drivers and contrary to popular belief, the stewards are made up of an international group - not just Italians. So yes, I would think they can judge more fairly the situation. Besides, Alonso does have a habit of lifting off in the middle of corners to wrong foot the driver behind and the parabolica would be a good place to do it so there is substance there. Really I don't think the FIA is as biased and people think. Read interviews with Max Mosley when you have the chance and you'll find they're not as clueless as they are made out to be.
A lot of people say the FIA's biased and so on. But they had telemetry from both cars, they have video footage, explanations from both drivers and contrary to popular belief, the stewards are made up of an international group - not just Italians. So yes, I would think they can judge more fairly the situation. Besides, Alonso does have a habit of lifting off in the middle of corners to wrong foot the driver behind and the parabolica would be a good place to do it so there is substance there. Really I don't think the FIA is as biased and people think. Read interviews with Max Mosley when you have the chance and you'll find they're not as clueless as they are made out to be.
Even ecclestone said the Alonso penalty was a farce.
Schumaker should have been banned from the race for intentionally stalling his car at Monaco. Not only did it put other drivers at a disadvantage timewise, its potentially deadly.
Schumaker should have been banned from the race for intentionally stalling his car at Monaco. Not only did it put other drivers at a disadvantage timewise, its potentially deadly.



