Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

AutoXers with 50 Trim turbos

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 03:39 PM
  #16  
2003lancerevo8's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 987
Likes: 0
From: IL
The 50 trim is just a few hundred laggier than the stock. I had a stock block AMS 50 trim kit and it was boosting around 3800-3900 rpms. You have to remember that a GT35R kit will spool up around 4100-4300 rpms unless I am misinformed.

I switched over to a 2.3 50 trim and all I can say is damn. that car on 93 with meth was 499 whp and 463 lbs of torque.

That was a good setup I thought. Each to his own, you might want to look at doing a 2.3 with all the bolt ons on the stock turbo.

Your torque will out run your horsepower and spool up would be stupid quick.

If you are just autoxing the car, I believe that would be your best combo. stock turbo with a 2.3.

My thoughts....
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 03:40 PM
  #17  
JordanS4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax
I'm right there with you. I was recently told by a DCEvoClub member in person he was going to run a 2.3 and 37R and have "full boost by 2900". Regardless, AMS should be more clear on their website. That kind of false advertising/information is detrimental to everyone in this community.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2007 | 03:41 PM
  #18  
JordanS4's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 2
From: Fairfax
Originally Posted by 2003lancerevo8
The 50 trim is just a few hundred laggier than the stock. I had a stock block AMS 50 trim kit and it was boosting around 3800-3900 rpms. You have to remember that a GT35R kit will spool up around 4100-4300 rpms unless I am misinformed.

I switched over to a 2.3 50 trim and all I can say is damn. that car on 93 with meth was 499 whp and 463 lbs of torque.

That was a good setup I thought. Each to his own, you might want to look at doing a 2.3 with all the bolt ons on the stock turbo.

Your torque will out run your horsepower and spool up would be stupid quick.

If you are just autoxing the car, I believe that would be your best combo. stock turbo with a 2.3.

My thoughts....
You are quite misinformed. 4100-4300 on a 35R? Not a chance, stroker, stage whatever head, etc...Not happening.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 06:50 AM
  #19  
DC2Dorifto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 97
Likes: 1
From: Fort Myers FL
You think the 20G-LT with the full race manifold and cams on the 2.0 would be a good setup?

I don't really want to tear apart the motor yet, it doesnt even have 10k on it.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:28 AM
  #20  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Full Race manifold would be an unnecessary expense, but the Green on 2.0 is already proven to be a great combo.

Last edited by Warrtalon; Sep 7, 2007 at 04:48 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:44 AM
  #21  
V.8MR's Avatar
EvoM Guru
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,249
Likes: 236
From: STL
Isn't a 50trim making 500 really pushing it. That thing has to be blowing hot air at that power level. I mean a 30r at 30psi barely makes 500/ maybe im wrong but i would think that hot air + road course/AutoX could be dangerous.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #22  
Warrtalon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 20,790
Likes: 2
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by V.8MR
Isn't a 50trim making 500 really pushing it. That thing has to be blowing hot air at that power level. I mean a 30r at 30psi barely makes 500/ maybe im wrong but i would think that hot air + road course/AutoX could be dangerous.
Yeah, 500whp is at the upper limit for a 50-trim, but blowing hot air isn't some specifically dangerous thing. You still tune for it to keep things safe, and we're talking autox here, which is at most 60 seconds of racing, not all of which is full throttle.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 09:38 PM
  #23  
markdaddio's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
I am running a green on a stock lower end 2.0. That setup makes 421 whp, and 400wtq on with an aem on 100 octane unleaded. I am not sure that you could use much more than that. I ended up putting the HKS 4.11 final drive gear in mine because I was running out of 2nd gear everywhere. Now it is good for 75mph at 8000 rpm in second. With that setup, I am virtually never waiting on boost. I have no doubt that a 50 trim on a built stroker that could turn 8500 rpm would make a great autocross motor, but the gains over what I have now would really be only a few 10ths, and would cost a lot. I can actually tune my car for c16 to make even more power than I am now, but I haven't.
Mark
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2007 | 06:15 AM
  #24  
DC2Dorifto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 97
Likes: 1
From: Fort Myers FL
What is needed to turn 8000rpm? Is head studs, retainers, and valve springs sufficient? I was planning on doing that and either Cosworth or GSC S1 cams soon.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 05:08 PM
  #25  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by JordanS4
I can't believe AMS has this on their website

AMS 50R Turbo Kit - 475-500WHP
Spool 3100-3600 RPM

The stock turbo barely spools that quick (usually around 3800-3900) @ 27 or 28 psi with cams, alky, etc...

Unless I'm misunderstanding "spool". Does "spool" to AMS mean Full Boost?
Those numbers are going to be in 4th or 5th gear. The stock turbo with supporting mods will hit full boost somewhere between 2700 and 3000 rpm depending on tune and setup. The 3100 rpm number is going to be with a stroker. The 3600 number is going to be more realistic with a 2.0l

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2007 | 05:10 PM
  #26  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by DC2Dorifto
What is needed to turn 8000rpm? Is head studs, retainers, and valve springs sufficient? I was planning on doing that and either Cosworth or GSC S1 cams soon.
For autocross use, where you will hit that RPM for just a couple seconds, you don't need anything. I wouldn't hold it that high though for any length of time (llike a road course).

EVOlutionary
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 09:36 AM
  #27  
DC2Dorifto's Avatar
Thread Starter
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 97
Likes: 1
From: Fort Myers FL
Well I'm going to do road courses also beginning next month. I'd rather be safe than sorry.
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 10:38 AM
  #28  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Well then you better add Rods and Rod Bolts to your list . . .
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 10:57 AM
  #29  
slicedbreadno2's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
So is the 20G with 2.3 stroker better or just stick with a 2.0?
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2007 | 02:54 PM
  #30  
EVOlutionary's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,673
Likes: 10
From: Michigan
Originally Posted by markdaddio
I am running a green on a stock lower end 2.0. That setup makes 421 whp, and 400wtq on with an aem on 100 octane unleaded. I am not sure that you could use much more than that . . . .
Mark
I now agree! Too much torque = bad for autocross = makes the car very hard to drive smoothly = makes me go . . . .
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:20 PM.