Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

FP Red Track Evo's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 02:51 PM
  #16  
GST Motorsports's Avatar
Account Disabled
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,366
Likes: 2
From: Hayward
Originally Posted by leecavturbo
would the performance of the red turbo for that power level sway you back if you wanted that level again and the failure issues are looking resolved so far as reports are atm?
I personally like finishing events more than playing roulette, but I've never been a big betting man.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 05:01 PM
  #17  
o-townFLA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 1
From: FLA-HI-SoCal
and I wonder how well the new oil line location coming off of the oil-filter housing works...
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 05:26 PM
  #18  
Zeus's Avatar
EvoM Staff Alumni
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 5,454
Likes: 1
From: Austin, TX
Seems to be GTG...
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 05:42 PM
  #19  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
Originally Posted by KevinD
with the first gen red, i saw more fail then i'm sure you'd like to hear. by december we had seen 5 reds melt at the track. one car alone went through 3, then FP instrumented it, and apparently solved the problems with it, because the next gen i haven't seen any problems with. we are planning on running a red on our 2.3L TTU car once the car is built. but for now we have a HTA35 sitting on the ground ready to go on the car. FP was awsome with support on the melted reds though. only one we had to cover some of the rebuild costs on because they said there was debris in the oil. incedentally all these failed reds i'm sure has to do with the strict recommendations on the oil feed line they have now.
What do you mean "first gen" vs. "next gen" red? Was there a change to the turbo other than the optional 80mm housing and the improved oil feed lines?

How much boost were the failed reds running?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 05:51 PM
  #20  
willitas34's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 476
Likes: 1
From: California
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
I personally like finishing events more than playing roulette, but I've never been a big betting man.
B, what was the issue, oil starvation or an overheating turbo? Just curious

I am also interested in what the changes were to the 2nd gen Red? New oil feed line location?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 06:46 PM
  #21  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
I personally like finishing events more than playing roulette, but I've never been a big betting man.
That is saying quite a bit!

When you were running it and it was working how did it feel compared to the new config? Do you feel it was drastically superior or just nice?
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 09:26 PM
  #22  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by EVO8LTW
What do you mean "first gen" vs. "next gen" red? Was there a change to the turbo other than the optional 80mm housing and the improved oil feed lines?

How much boost were the failed reds running?

the turbos underwent some revisions early in production because when exposed to long heat cycles obviously they were tearing apart from the inside. these revisions i'm sure had to do with oiling at the very least. but during this process we were told it could have been the intake (to much restriction with the stock rubber intake), it could be the o2 housing not utilizing the support bracket and the weight deforming it under heat cycle, and then the oiling issues was the latest which seemed to fix it.

the car that burned through three reds was running pump gas on the streets at around 28psi, and on thetrack he ran 110 i beleive at the same boost as a safety margin. by the third one he was on E85 at around 24psi because he was limited by the single walbro.

the second car (denver) was also on E85, and he said he was running a lot of boost too.

the third car and 5th red was on pump gas and meth at 30psi. thats the one we had to cover the rebuild because FP said it was oil contamination. shortly after the "oil filter required" recommendation came out. now its changed again to use the oil filter housing for a oil source.

once again though, FP was awsome with helping us out with the melted turbos. thats why now that the bugs are worked out we are wanting to run one in our TTU car.


oh and using the HTA35r in our TTU car with the 2.3 wont work well. based off the weight projection of our car, and the Weight/Power ratio that is required to be in the class, we will be limited to around 420whp. that means we need a ton of torque and need to keep the revs down so the power is within the limit. red has quicker spool and will help here. for redline or TTR obviously the HTA35r would be better.
Reply
Old Aug 2, 2009 | 09:58 PM
  #23  
spdracerut's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 39
From: Hermosa Beach, CA
Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske
We have a local guy that killed a stock motor main bearing on the third lap at the AMS Autobahn lapping day.

The car was meth injected and when pulling the motor the oil seemed very thin and was black as the ace of spades.

This was the stock frame red with stock oil line.
That may be independent of the turbo used. Granted, high exhaust manifold backpressure due to a small turbine housing isn't exactly easy on an engine.

But the bearing failure maybe have been from the oil getting too thin from being too hot. Maybe oil starvation from high lateral G loads. Etc.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 06:16 AM
  #24  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
^ I agree.
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 07:31 AM
  #25  
tnt1106's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Originally Posted by KevinD
the third car and 5th red was on pump gas and meth at 30psi. thats the one we had to cover the rebuild because FP said it was oil contamination. shortly after the "oil filter required" recommendation came out. now its changed again to use the oil filter housing for a oil source.

once again though, FP was awsome with helping us out with the melted turbos. thats why now that the bugs are worked out we are wanting to run one in our TTU car.


.
Actually to interject FP recommended the Oil feed line filter very early in the production of the Evo Red. (in your timeline on the first car's turbo #1 (post failure)
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 08:15 AM
  #26  
EVO8LTW's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,606
Likes: 98
From: Northern Virginia
FP's website recommends only 25-27 psi at redline even with race gas. I wonder how many of these failed reds were running past that?
Reply
Old Aug 3, 2009 | 12:25 PM
  #27  
o-townFLA's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,466
Likes: 1
From: FLA-HI-SoCal
how low would the psi drop to in a high-G turn is the question...
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 06:13 AM
  #28  
Levar's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
Originally Posted by GST Motorsports
I personally like finishing events more than playing roulette, but I've never been a big betting man.
Are you running the HTA35r on a 2.0L engine?

Originally Posted by KevinD
...by the third one he was on E85 at around 24psi because he was limited by the single walbro. the second car (denver) was also on E85, and he said he was running a lot of boost too.
Kevin, I have quite the EVO parts building up here in Iraq. I'm looking at the FP Red (v2) with the 80mm surge port, 25PSI wastegate acuator, porting, installation kit v2, 3" straight coupler, 3" intake pipe, BR ported intake manifold (with 65mm TB), MAPerformance O2 dump, BR ported and jet coated exhaust manifold, CBRD 4" FMIC, APS twin vent BOV, and 1000cc injectors. My concern is at this time I am not interested in having astronomical power numbers and I do not want to buy a double pumper. I simply want to take advantage of the E85 for a while. Power-wise, what would I be limited to if I wanted to get tuned on E85, 1000cc injectors, and single Walbro?
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 08:28 AM
  #29  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
red on E85 will need a double pumper. no doubt. unless your content with like 23psi and low 400whp.
Reply
Old Aug 10, 2009 | 09:04 AM
  #30  
Levar's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: Army
iTrader: (85)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,438
Likes: 6
From: Central Texas
Originally Posted by KevinD
red on E85 will need a double pumper. no doubt. unless your content with like 23psi and low 400whp.
Nah! That is not going to cut it for me. Double pumper...roger. Are 1000cc injectors plenty? Thanks. I sure can't wait to redeploy.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:21 PM.