Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

Perfect Track Wheels Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2011, 03:03 PM
  #121  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
EvoJoeRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Whoops. Your right. I was thinking backwards. I'll fix that
Old May 5, 2011, 06:07 AM
  #122  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
EvoJoeRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fixed...

Im seeing a window of 140mm to 160mm of backspace. Has any one measured this out just to confirm?
Old May 5, 2011, 08:34 AM
  #123  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
EvoJoeRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about the Enkei NT03M in a 18x 10.5" +40 thats 133+40 so 173 back spacing. If that was run with a 15 or 20mm spacer it would give 153mm - 158mm of back spacing and 108mm - 113mm if front spacing.

Would this work on the the IX?
Old Jun 7, 2011, 06:21 PM
  #124  
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
jimountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
tire weights

the pilot sport cups in a 285-30-18 weigh 25 lbs.

I still have 17 x 8's and purchased the (super sports)
235-45-17's for d.d. which weigh 22 lbs.
Old Jun 10, 2011, 06:25 AM
  #125  
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
4cdndctn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: NNJ
Posts: 771
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Thanks EVOlutionary for the initial review/insight - I picked up the wheels from Ravspec wrapped in R1's and I'll get'em on the track next week. To add to the light weight, CBRD Ti lugs compliment the weight and the swag.
Old Jun 11, 2011, 11:24 AM
  #126  
Evolved Member
 
mouseIX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 785
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by boomn29


Now since then, I've picked up a set of Volk LE28's as well as a set of Forgeline ZX3R's - both in 18x9.5" fitment. Both fit great, don't need spacers, can handle 255-285 Hoosiers with very minimal rubbing and are all FORGED.

Offsets? I'm at the point where I need more tire and I refuse to run spacers!!

Thanks Craig

Great thread btw!
Old Jun 14, 2011, 05:45 AM
  #127  
Evolving Member
 
Jason's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Jamaica/FortLauderdale
Posts: 185
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Staggered offset setup ??

Apart from not being able to rotate wheels. What is the downside of running a staggered offset setup ?? For example 18X9.5 +28 Front to avoid using spacers and 18X9.5 +34 Rear to avoid rubbing the fender. Thanx

Jay
Old Jun 14, 2011, 10:17 AM
  #128  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
EvoJoeRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
To run a 315/30 Hoosier A6... do you think a 10.5 or 11" rim?
Old Jun 14, 2011, 07:38 PM
  #129  
Evolved Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (38)
 
EVOlutionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,673
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Jason
Apart from not being able to rotate wheels. What is the downside of running a staggered offset setup ?? For example 18X9.5 +28 Front to avoid using spacers and 18X9.5 +34 Rear to avoid rubbing the fender. Thanx

Jay
None.

Originally Posted by EvoJoeRacing
To run a 315/30 Hoosier A6... do you think a 10.5 or 11" rim?
I would say the 11" wheel. Hoosier recommends 11-12" wheel.
Old Jun 15, 2011, 05:54 AM
  #130  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
drewgray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: in the sticks
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
11" would be better, but they fit on 10.5"s pretty easily.
Old Jun 15, 2011, 11:34 AM
  #131  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Dallas J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,813
Received 738 Likes on 571 Posts
For the 285 Hoosiers or 295 Goodyears is a 9.5" rim needed to get the tire to tuck front and rear or with the right offset will tuck with a 10"?
Old Jun 15, 2011, 11:47 AM
  #132  
chu
Evolved Member
iTrader: (72)
 
chu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 2,831
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Dallas J
For the 285 Hoosiers or 295 Goodyears is a 9.5" rim needed to get the tire to tuck front and rear or with the right offset will tuck with a 10"?
Selecting a mass produced wheel that wide, that will clear front Brembos and rear trailing arms is a tough. The 8/9s like low offset in front and high offset in the rear. Unless there is plans to do massive fender massaging, it really takes alot to fit perfect fitting 10inch wheels on the car and still run proper tires.
Old Jun 15, 2011, 11:54 AM
  #133  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Dallas J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,813
Received 738 Likes on 571 Posts
So that makes me wonder why run a 285 hoosier on a 9.5" when a 255 on a 10" will be almost exactly the same section width.

285 => 11.5 - 0.2 = 11.3in

255 => 10.8 + 0.4 = 11.2in

This is based on tire racks posting of an industry rule of thumb, .5" change in rim width nets ~ 0.2" section width change. http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete...jsp?techid=200

The advantage to this being you can get the 10" wheel with a 255 to fit and have better side wall angles than the squeezed 285 on a 9.5". Same Section width but less sidewall squirm.
Old Jun 15, 2011, 12:12 PM
  #134  
Evolving Member
iTrader: (2)
 
EvoJoeRacing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It comes down to application and purpose. For autox people jam the largest tire you can on the smallest rim. 285/30 A6's on a 10" rim is what everyone seems to run with rolled rear fenders. Some people will run 285/30's on a 10" front 9.5" rear.

I run a 255/35 Z1*Specs on a 9" rim and its pretty much square... some people run 285/30 AD08's on a 9.5" rim. And there are people that run 275/35's NT05 on a 10.5" rim.

It comes down to application of racing and how you like your tires to feel. Tires that have a little bit of stretch to them can feel a bit more crisp and responsive. Tires that bulge might have a slower response but will gain more traction in a high G corner and have less rotational mass due to the smaller width rim.

On top of that you cannot really compare the cross sectional width of tires across brands as there is not a "Standard" in measurement across all brands.

Depending on your application and your style driving will better guide you down the path of choosing tire to rim width groupings.
Old Jun 15, 2011, 12:27 PM
  #135  
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (1)
 
Dallas J's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Portland, Or
Posts: 5,813
Received 738 Likes on 571 Posts
My point is if the "industry standard" is accurate the 285 is only putting down maybe .1-.2 in more than the same Hoosier A6 in a 255 (which is essentially a cheater tire as its about the same size as a 275). The .1-.2 in an extra 2% rubber but the 255 will have a stiffer side wall with less tire roll requiring less static camber improving braking...

Of course, putting the 285 on the same wheel would definitely make it wider than the 255 but were talking about what can fit under a BSP legal CT9A fender.

Also the added weight of a an extra 0.5" wheel is offset by the 2# lighter wheel. I guess Ill just have to give it a shot myself.


Quick Reply: Perfect Track Wheels Thread



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:52 PM.