Notices
Motor Sports If you like rallying, road racing, autoxing, or track events, then this is the spot for you.

Alignment Question - Suspension Gurus

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 8, 2016 | 07:32 AM
  #1  
kyoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 282
From: US
Alignment Question - Suspension Gurus

Saw something interesting on the sandbox yesterday, but didn't get a clear answer for mcstrut cars like ours:

traditional thought is that camber won't impact tire wear as long as you're not running any toe. However:

I think what is being missed here is that as you add negative camber, you actually need to add some toe out to negate the camber thrust forces that are working against each other. I run -3 degrees on the front of my vette and couple that with 1/16-1/8 inch of toe out to get the best wear results. I drove my car to 1300 miles each way to Nationals with no major inside wear. It will show after 8000 to 10000 street miles though. Each front tire when cambered produces a vector force towards the other side of the car. if both sides are cambered, these forces fight each other going straight down the road. This is the reason why negative camber at the front makes the car change directions so quickly. The pushing together forces that cancel each other manifest in tire scrub if the tires are pointing straight ahead. For every car and camber combination, there is an amount of toe out that will minimize the scrub of the tire. You can use coast down testing, or do like I did and just run 3/32 toe out for 3 degrees negative. I have a much bigger wear issue on the inside rear on my vette running 1.6 negative with 0 toe than at the front. Hope that makes sense.
- M. Daddio

TLDR; you actually should add a tiny amount of toe out for the camber you add on your car for the best (smallest) tire wear
Is that true for mcstruts like ours as well??
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 05:29 AM
  #2  
MrAWD's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 22
From: Reading, MA
Interesting!!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 08:38 AM
  #3  
Butt Dyno's Avatar
EvoM Guru
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,733
Likes: 154
From: Why do they always call the Evo the Dark Side?
Between my WRX and Evo, both struts in the front (where all the negative camber is), I can only say I have had good results with zero toe. I can't speak to the geometry aspect, just that's what I've seen. I had a set of RE11s as street tires on the Evo for 4 years that were still going strong when I got a puncture in one of them. I'm guessing 10-12k on them and the inner wear was acceptable considering -3.5 camber in the front.
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 08:52 AM
  #4  
MrAWD's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,760
Likes: 22
From: Reading, MA
Actually, I am also running about 2.5 degree of camber in the front with zero toe and tire wear is pretty good!
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 08:29 PM
  #5  
alleggerita's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 638
Likes: 7
Makes sense to me. McPherson should be no different than any other suspension.

Land Rover has been using front toe out on the full time 4WD truck chassis for a long time even with live front axle.

FWIW, on my Evo I am running 2.5 degree front camber with 1/16" toe out up front and 1.25 rear camber with 0 toe out in the rear on AD08R's and this has given me the best tire wear yet. Absolutely even wear across the tread for fast road use on both front and rear.

Didn't like toe-out in the front initially on my old tires where the inside had already worn - on those 0 toe felt better.

It also is consistent with the built in toe change in the suspension as the front suspension will increase negative toe on compression, whereas the rear will increase positive toe on compression.

PSRS, spherical rear trailing arm bushings, rear bump steer bsuhing and front steering precision kit button things down for better toe control and tire wear as well. For motorsport I would probably up the camber from 2.5 in the front ....
Reply
Old Nov 9, 2016 | 08:43 PM
  #6  
kyoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 282
From: US
so the camber on the front passenger's tire for example, sets the vector to point slightly left - and then you set the toe out to "straighten" that vector?

i get that that will straighten the vector, if i'm understanding it correctly, but what i dont get is, the vector may be straight but any amount of toe is still going to change the direction of the vector vs the direction of the tire rotation isn't it?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2016 | 08:09 AM
  #7  
Prime12's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 275
Likes: 11
I recently read on a different enthusiast forum that some front toe-out can help with outside shoulder wear.

Does this make any sense at all? I asked the writer if he could explain but did not get any follow up posts from him.

I have been running -2 degrees camber with 0 toe up front for the past 2 years (SCCA B-Street) on my X. The outside shoulders on my front tires are absolutely getting murdered with the inner half still looking brand new. Since I can't add any more camber without moving up a class I am open to trying anything that can possibly alleviate the shoulder wear.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2016 | 08:14 AM
  #8  
kyoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 282
From: US
toe out would help with OUTSIDE shoulder wear if i'm not mistaken - i believe it's the inner wear that we should worried about with toe, no?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2016 | 08:18 AM
  #9  
Prime12's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 275
Likes: 11
Originally Posted by kyoo
toe out would help with OUTSIDE shoulder wear if i'm not mistaken - i believe it's the inner wear that we should worried about with toe, no?
I hate to hijack the thread, but could you explain why? I'd love to have less outside shoulder wear even at the expense of some additional inner wear (feel free to PM me instead of replying if you don't want the thread going off topic).
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2016 | 08:33 AM
  #10  
kyoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 282
From: US
doesn't it, at least coupled with camber, wear out the inside more, while allowing the car to have more contact width in cornering? i dont know... im the one that poses questions around here!
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2016 | 08:50 AM
  #11  
Dallas J's Avatar
EvoM Guru
Veteran: Army
Photogenic
Liked
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 5,969
Likes: 811
From: Portland, Or
I always thought toe-out with heavy camber was a recipe for disaster on inside wear and you wanted a touch of toe-in. Seems like others are saying the opposite?
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2016 | 08:55 AM
  #12  
kyoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 282
From: US
Originally Posted by Dallas J
I always thought toe-out with heavy camber was a recipe for disaster on inside wear and you wanted a touch of toe-in. Seems like others are saying the opposite?
that's exactly what i thought. daddio is saying the opposite for his vette at least, so i was at the least wondering if it's geometry related, or if it applies to all cars. maybe if you're wearing the outside of your tires really badly, with toe out you can wear the insides badly as well, lol? but then he would have said even wear, as opposed to better wear
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2016 | 09:15 AM
  #13  
LetsGetThisDone's Avatar
EvoM Guru
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 15,973
Likes: 1,629
From: Las Vegas
Originally Posted by Dallas J
I always thought toe-out with heavy camber was a recipe for disaster on inside wear and you wanted a touch of toe-in. Seems like others are saying the opposite?

Same here.

Originally Posted by kyoo
that's exactly what i thought. daddio is saying the opposite for his vette at least, so i was at the least wondering if it's geometry related, or if it applies to all cars. maybe if you're wearing the outside of your tires really badly, with toe out you can wear the insides badly as well, lol? but then he would have said even wear, as opposed to better wear
The Vette is a dual a-arm suspension, which is very different from Mac strut.
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2016 | 09:23 AM
  #14  
kyoo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,833
Likes: 282
From: US
Originally Posted by letsgetthisdone
Same here.



The Vette is a dual a-arm suspension, which is very different from Mac strut.
right, that's what I'm saying. i wonder then if him seeing better wear is based on his geometry and wouldn't hold true for us?
Reply
Old Nov 19, 2016 | 10:05 AM
  #15  
Thoe99's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,202
Likes: 20
From: Orlando, FL
I've run 0 toe the entire time I've had the Evo and never had anything to complain about inner tire wear. However, I don't do a lot of long distance driving in the Evo.
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:31 PM.