Notices
North Texas Evo Club (NTEC) For discussions in and around North Texas
View Poll Results: Replace the driver to save weight?
Yes, kick his tubby arse to the curb...
17
94.44%
No, we may be able to still make it!
1
5.56%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll

Weight Reduction - Car or Driver?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 07:19 PM
  #1  
SiliconTek's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: Autocrossing Somewhere
Weight Reduction - Car or Driver?

So, if you are grossly overweight, which I'm not, would you first look to save weight on the car or yourself? I mean losing 100lbs on the driver's body seems more realistic to me than spending thousands on saving a couple pounds or two on the car...

All I know is losing 100lbs on the car is very well noticeable. I cannot imagine losing 100lbs on the driver and running half a tank!

This is a post I found from another forum and thought it was kinda cool, if you don't have a sense of humour, I am sorry!

Last edited by SiliconTek; Aug 31, 2010 at 07:21 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 08:52 PM
  #2  
goofygrin's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 3,125
Likes: 4
From: Frisco, TX
It's funny. There's an autocrosser that's easily 350, likely close to 400#. I've heard multiple times that he'd shave time if he dropped 100# (in addition to all the health gains).

Go look at F1 drivers. They are like jockeys. Until you get into the rougher driving sports like rally you don't see many burly dudes.
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 10:18 PM
  #3  
ak47m203's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Tx,
This was 2008 Danica Patrick criticizes new IRL weight rule, a few guys is complaining against Danica Patrick that she only weigths 100lbs.



An Indy Racing League rule change has Danica Patrick feeling as if she'll be penalized for being petite — which the popular driver said wouldn't happen in other sports.
Starting this season, the minimum weight for IRL cars will include the driver, and Patrick is the series' lightest at 100 pounds according to the 2007 media guide (which lists other female drivers Milka Duno and Sarah Fisher at 120 pounds apiece; Ed Carpenter is the heaviest at 165).

"If someone's going to take the hit it's going to be me," Patrick said Thursday. "It's disappointing the league decided to do that. In so many other sports, athletes don't get penalized for being too strong, or too tall or too fast.

"(It's) just your God-given stature is being penalized. What am I going to do, though? It's not my decision. That's the people higher up (who) made their bed, and they've got to lay in it."

Patrick said she asked IRL officials about the reason for the change but said "they didn't really have one.

"I just follow the rules," she said. "Maybe I'll get more specific reasons somewhere down the line …"

IRL spokesman John Griffin said the rule was intended to reduce the difference between the lightest and heaviest drivers, which is a gap that can range from 75 to 100 pounds.

"We want to make absolutely clear this is not a Danica rule," Griffin said. "You look at guys like Dan Wheldon and Marco Andretti, and they're light guys."

Griffin wouldn't disclose the cars' minimum weight but said drivers are broken into three weight classifications. The heaviest would have weight reduced from its car while the lightest would have a maximum 35 pounds of ballast added.

"It's something that had been looked at and was in the back of our minds every year," Griffin said.

Patrick admits to having had a slight speed edge from weighing less in a sport where lighter means faster. An Associated Press story in 2005 reported rival teams estimated Patrick might gain nearly 1 mph because of her weight, and Sprint Cup driver Robby Gordon said he wouldn't race Patrick in the IRL until the series equalized weights as NASCAR's premier circuit does.

Patrick hopes to put the issue behind her by winning the season-opening Gainsco 300 at Homestead Miami Speedway on Saturday.

"Let's just do that," she said with a laugh, "and then I'll say, 'Why didn't you guys do this years ago?' "

Gracious offer:

David Reutimann would give up running for a Nationwide Series championship — and a larger share of each race's purse — if the result was more money and exposure for the series' teams without Sprint Cup ties.

"The only way to truly help is to give them more money so they can hire engineers and pay for wind tunnel time," Reutimann said during a Nationwide test at Richmond International Raceway.

Reutimann, who is running both the Cup and Nationwide circuits for the second consecutive season for Michael Waltrip Racing, believes NASCAR should redistribute its prize money to Nationwide-only teams and perhaps limit Cup drivers from earning points.

"If that takes me out of a seat and gives someone else an opportunity, maybe that's not a bad thing because I needed an opportunity one time," he said. "My first race was here in Richmond with one car, one motor and barely enough money for a set of tires." Jason Keller, the career Nationwide leader in starts (428), has "mixed emotions" about points restrictions.

"The series needs Cup flavor," he said. "But David hit the nail on the head … We do need more money."


Reply
Old Aug 31, 2010 | 10:23 PM
  #4  
ak47m203's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
From: Tx,
ok this is the fat guy complaining.... LOL, 200lbs vs 100lbs.




Gordon stated the day before the race that because Patrick weighs just 100 pounds, her car is lighter than everyone else in the field. Unlike other series, the IRL does not include a driver when setting its weight limit.

In NASCAR, where Gordon currently competes, the minimum weight requirement includes the driver.

But in the IRL, a car must weigh 1,525 pounds before the fuel and driver are added. A smaller driver would have at least a slight edge over heavier ones because of the rule.

“This rule has been around for years, and it’s something that Paul Tracy and I have talked about for a long time,” said Gordon, who weighs nearly 200 pounds.

Gordon’s comments actually echoed those of several drivers in Indianapolis who complained that Patrick had an advantage.


Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 05:47 AM
  #5  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
These heavy professional drivers need to STFU. Do you hear scrawny white boys complaining that the NFL needs a weight limit?

In response to the OP, I do find it funny with overweight guys spend THOUSANDS on their car to make it lighter when they could simply hit the treadmill and skip the fried chicken. I'm definitely no lightweight, but I only do weight-reduction mods that are free or have other benefits such as steering response with lighter wheels.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 07:48 AM
  #6  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
fortunately all weight reduction improves steering response, increases acceleration, improves braking and gas mileage, and makes the car less hard on parts including wear items (tires,brakes, clutch). i would say if your racing, and 100lbs overweight, you definately will want to make an effort to reduce your own mass.... but obviously lossing 100lbs can take a while, whereas replacing the stock exhaust with a light weight one can save 50lbs and is removed in an hour.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 01:33 PM
  #7  
Donkeypuncher's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 251
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
i weigh almost 2 1/2 Danica Patricks. We should start a new measurement for weight. I need to lose about 1/2 of a Patrick to be at my ideal weight.
Reply
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 01:44 PM
  #8  
Laxman's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 480
Likes: 13
From: Tucson
I weight twice as much as that chick, but I could only safely lose about 15 lbs (and that was only when I was marathon training! Max performance advantage = tiny chick.

Maybe it should be like the carnival..."you must be this tall to drive on this ride"
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 08:56 PM
  #9  
yellowevo84's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Mckinney, Tx
okay so which one of us was the only one to post take weight off the car.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 02:51 PM
  #10  
chad99evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Korea
the driver weight loss mod = jogging which = free PLUS the weight loss plus more endurance when racing and lookin good... thats 4 for the price of 1
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2010 | 02:54 PM
  #11  
chad99evo's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
From: Korea
Originally Posted by Donkeypuncher
i weigh almost 2 1/2 Danica Patricks. We should start a new measurement for weight. I need to lose about 1/2 of a Patrick to be at my ideal weight.
I second the vote for the Danica Patrick driver-weighting system. LOL!
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 09:30 AM
  #12  
Supraboy1's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
From: Allen
Ok here is the solution.... we know that gas weighs in at around 7 lbs per gallon. So only keep 1 gallon of fuel in the tank at a time.. this will save about 90 lbs in your fuel tank. Then to avoid being short on gas keep three 5 gallon gas containers in your truck filled up. And this I learned from Texas A&M. Go aggies. We be smart.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 09:46 AM
  #13  
snowfish's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 81
Likes: 0
From: Canada
IF I lived in the States, I'd be fat too. In'nOut, Sonic etc. But since I live in Canada, I is skinny.

They say you'll live longer, it's healthier blah blah blah. I'll trade it all for some sunshine and an In'nOut double.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #14  
EvImVictim's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 56
Likes: 0
From: United States of Texas
Originally Posted by Supraboy1
Ok here is the solution.... we know that gas weighs in at around 7 lbs per gallon. So only keep 1 gallon of fuel in the tank at a time.. this will save about 90 lbs in your fuel tank. Then to avoid being short on gas keep three 5 gallon gas containers in your truck filled up. And this I learned from Texas A&M. Go aggies. We be smart.
You be dumb. Maintaining an empty tank does two things, float arm of fuel gauge bangs up and down in the tank and gets knocked out of calibration and most important, the bigger an airspace you maintain, the greater the amount of condensation (water) you will get in the tank. Airplanes are always parked with FULL tanks for that very reason.

Hook 'em Horns.
Reply
Old Sep 9, 2010 | 11:19 AM
  #15  
KevinD's Avatar
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (56)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,701
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by EvImVictim
You be dumb. Maintaining an empty tank does two things, float arm of fuel gauge bangs up and down in the tank and gets knocked out of calibration and most important, the bigger an airspace you maintain, the greater the amount of condensation (water) you will get in the tank. Airplanes are always parked with FULL tanks for that very reason.

Hook 'em Horns.


haha i think he was joking, cause if he carried 15 gallons of gas in his trunk, hes not saving any weight . although he did say TRUCK, so i'll just assume that was a typo. wuu UTA!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:34 AM.