you don't see me running mudflaps either

granted - i have huge gashes and straight up holes in my paint - even on my A pillar!

argh...

HAHAHAHA - the rock hair icon rules.

 

Dex, tactrix no longer sells the 1.x cables. Good thing they replaced it with a 2+x the price cable...

 

From everything I've seen about the X's paint chipping problem on certain types of roads they'll save you a whole lot of money

 

Im still considering some form of clearbra too... Do you guys think the mudflaps eliminate the need for clearbra? Guess the front still needs something, but i dunno about the back doors.

 

holy hell thats expensive. the Evoscan guy will probably pick up the slack - he sells his own version of the 1.x cables. (despite the stolen design)

I do like the 2.x device. Theoretically it should be able to log at a higher resolution then a laptop.

 

KG, I also have the 3M clear on my front bumper, and sideskirts as well, also had it on my stock rear bumper and hood. It is definitely a good investment, imo

 

yeah but i dont think we were ever limited by the laptop, i thought the protocol was too slow.

 

you have any local places that you recommend for this? I want to get the new toy done asap

 

Greg has a guy in Milford he uses. Does an excellent job. UhasPM btw.

 

Does this mean what I think it means....????....you has C6 nowz....or something else...????

 

for large MUT requests - yes the protocol is definitely the bottleneck. But if you are only logging rpm, timing, knock - i think USB overhead is slowing things down. i dont know *shrugs* theoretically 12Mb/s is more then enough to keep up with the 100Kb/s MUT.

 

oh hell yeah! can't wait to see this beast!

 

yeah USB 2.0 is like 480mps

 

 

nice, I will have to contact him.