Notices

2011 vs 2015: OS/RVR - 2015 Much faster....

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 30, 2015, 03:37 PM
  #16  
Evolved Member
 
Landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
one of these days, i'll do a 0-60 run with my OBDII bluetooth adapter and the Torque app.

wont do much good here - i have the 2.4L, but maybe someone with access to an older and a 2015 2.0L can do the same .....
Old Oct 6, 2015, 06:17 PM
  #17  
Newbie
 
fujing21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: London ON
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
2015 has a completely new designed cvt. So it is not a cvt software updated!

I felt that too the 2.0 is even felt faster and smoother than the 2.4....
Old Oct 6, 2015, 08:01 PM
  #18  
Evolved Member
 
Landshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by fujing21
2015 has a completely new designed cvt. So it is not a cvt software updated!

I felt that too the 2.0 is even felt faster and smoother than the 2.4....

the 2.4 is almost to the point of being too jumpy off the line. i have to remember to go easy on the throttle from a stop - its my wife's car and i only drive it occasionally.
Old Oct 7, 2015, 07:26 AM
  #19  
Newbie
 
vnaald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 25
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Landshark
the 2.4 is almost to the point of being too jumpy off the line. i have to remember to go easy on the throttle from a stop - its my wife's car and i only drive it occasionally.
We've got the 2.0 and it can be very jumpy off the line and from stops as well. We drove the 2.0 and 2.4 in test drives and the 2.4 definitely had more power, but the 2.0 has some pep as well, you've just got to learn to treat the 2.0 differently to get results. Punching it with the 2.0 doesn't get much of a result for me, but light and consistent pressure gets respectable results.

I've not driven anything other than a 2015, so I was surprised by all the reviews calling it sluggish and slow. Sure it's no sports care but if you drive it right it's just fine.
Old Dec 22, 2015, 05:04 PM
  #20  
Evolved Member
 
AWCAWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Montreal, QC, Canada
Posts: 609
Received 38 Likes on 36 Posts
Off the line it may be true and may even be backed up by some data. See post #6 in this thread below for details:
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/ou...rent-cvts.html
It provides comparison with the 2.4L and some competition as well.
So many people claimed the title of this thread, so I tried to find a justification. I was
like "doubting Thomas" but now with some rough estimations (calculations) I have to admit it is a very feasible claim.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
94AWDcoupe
Project Cars / Build Threads
61
Sep 12, 2020 11:15 PM
rotterdam
Outlander Sport
16
Jan 11, 2020 12:50 PM
xelloss
Outlander Sport
28
Jun 5, 2017 04:34 AM
rotterdam
Outlander Sport
1
Jan 23, 2015 02:34 PM
mRVRsport
Outlander Sport
4
Oct 18, 2014 03:29 PM



Quick Reply: 2011 vs 2015: OS/RVR - 2015 Much faster....



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:46 AM.