Porsche 911 4g63 swap, again
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 908
Likes: 5
From: South of the Mason Dixon
No just rear wheel drive only. The 4g63 is the same length but taller and lighter. I will find out how it handles. Never herd of any negatives about handling from any of the conversions.
Car dropped off at body shop today, get it back in two weeks. Then motor build.
Car dropped off at body shop today, get it back in two weeks. Then motor build.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 908
Likes: 5
From: South of the Mason Dixon
Such a cool project.
God forbid anybody from any of the Porsche forums like 6speedonline see this; this would be so blasphemous for them to hear about.
I always wanted to do some sort of weird swap.
BTW, what about the drivetrain........are you planning on making it AWD too?
God forbid anybody from any of the Porsche forums like 6speedonline see this; this would be so blasphemous for them to hear about.
I always wanted to do some sort of weird swap.
BTW, what about the drivetrain........are you planning on making it AWD too?
It seems a cool project!
I had an EVO and now I have a Porsche too!
Personally I would go with a flat four Subaru STI motor just to keep the boxer characteristics of the car and the lower center of gravity. Plus I think mounting would be easier...
Good luck with the project. Can't wait to see the end result.
I had an EVO and now I have a Porsche too!
Personally I would go with a flat four Subaru STI motor just to keep the boxer characteristics of the car and the lower center of gravity. Plus I think mounting would be easier...
Good luck with the project. Can't wait to see the end result.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 908
Likes: 5
From: South of the Mason Dixon
It seems a cool project!
I had an EVO and now I have a Porsche too!
Personally I would go with a flat four Subaru STI motor just to keep the boxer characteristics of the car and the lower center of gravity. Plus I think mounting would be easier...
Good luck with the project. Can't wait to see the end result.
I had an EVO and now I have a Porsche too!
Personally I would go with a flat four Subaru STI motor just to keep the boxer characteristics of the car and the lower center of gravity. Plus I think mounting would be easier...
Good luck with the project. Can't wait to see the end result.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 908
Likes: 5
From: South of the Mason Dixon
Sub'd, this is all kinds of awesome. Was starting to think of a P car, but reading up on IMS failures made me think twice. There's a guy who did a SBC swap bc of that, but I like your choice better.
the IMS has a fix but IMO you have to fix it before you get the problem. Except this problem the motors are quite reliable.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (31)
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 908
Likes: 5
From: South of the Mason Dixon
they are bad in the early boxsters and from 1999 2001 they up graded the problem when they went to the 3.6 the turbos have
a different motor and no ims problems.
a different motor and no ims problems.


