MZM Dyno Day Dyno Sheets from 7/30
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Links working! MZM Dyno Day Dyno Sheets from 7/30
Here are the sheets. I tried to list the mods as best I could remember them. Unfortunately, I don't know any of the mods on the VWs or Audis, but know they were all modded. Not all the cars were dynoed all the dyno day, but they all were dynoed in the last week or so.
Robert
Links in next thread.
Robert
Links in next thread.
Last edited by robertrinaustin; Aug 8, 2005 at 07:08 AM.
EVO and STi Dyno Sheets - Dyno Day 07-30-2005.doc <--- right click - save as
Aud and VW Dyno Sheets - MZM Dyno Day 07-30-2005.doc <--- right click - save as
Aud and VW Dyno Sheets - MZM Dyno Day 07-30-2005.doc <--- right click - save as
What do the #'s mean anyway? I've heard that this dyno reads low but is that because it reads true? If not then what is the real whp on these cars? I'd have thought that the gt35 kit would have been putting out more. Isn't this kit capable of 500-550+whp? Is that cause Bob dosn't have the internals? Because looking under the hood the car looks impressive as hell...
Also, Hameed gained that much whp from just adding a cat back?? (or everything under the 1st comments section?) If just the cat back, Dammm....
(especially considering how low that dyno is reading)
Lastly, why were the WRX's putting down so much? I don't know that much about them (how much they spent to get where they are hp wise) but they were putting up impressive #'s on the dyno considering that the EVO's there weren't too shabby themselves.
Also, Hameed gained that much whp from just adding a cat back?? (or everything under the 1st comments section?) If just the cat back, Dammm....
(especially considering how low that dyno is reading)
Lastly, why were the WRX's putting down so much? I don't know that much about them (how much they spent to get where they are hp wise) but they were putting up impressive #'s on the dyno considering that the EVO's there weren't too shabby themselves.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by Got Boost?
What do the #'s mean anyway? I've heard that this dyno reads low but is that because it reads true? If not then what is the real whp on these cars?
Originally Posted by Got Boost?
I'd have thought that the gt35 kit would have been putting out more. Isn't this kit capable of 500-550+whp? Is that cause Bob dosn't have the internals? Because looking under the hood the car looks impressive as hell...
Originally Posted by Got Boost?
Also, Hameed gained that much whp from just adding a cat back?? (or everything under the 1st comments section?) If just the cat back, Dammm....(especially considering how low that dyno is reading)
Originally Posted by Got Boost?
Lastly, why were the WRX's putting down so much? I don't know that much about them (how much they spent to get where they are hp wise) but they were putting up impressive #'s on the dyno considering that the EVO's there weren't too shabby themselves. 

Hopefully I answered all your questions.
Last edited by robertrinaustin; Aug 8, 2005 at 05:46 PM.
All Mustang Dyno read very true to the power. Typically the numbers are often lower and most are disappointed. I had a customer who tuned their Civic on our dyno and lived on Oklahoma. The drove back and BLASTED a Z-o6. The guy called me from his cell phone to tell me.
Essentially the "brake" on the drums creat force or drag in real world enviroment. If you are serious about tuning and want true power sheets then use a Mustang. If you want a stat sheet and trying to sell your car then use a non enertia dyno. The power is skew'd but somewhat accurate. The curves tend to spool up faster as opposed to dropping off like power should. Props to MZM, they have always taken care of their dyno number and have laid down some big power.
Essentially the "brake" on the drums creat force or drag in real world enviroment. If you are serious about tuning and want true power sheets then use a Mustang. If you want a stat sheet and trying to sell your car then use a non enertia dyno. The power is skew'd but somewhat accurate. The curves tend to spool up faster as opposed to dropping off like power should. Props to MZM, they have always taken care of their dyno number and have laid down some big power.
Trending Topics
Yes, you answered my questions perfectly.
I would rather be disappointed with the truth than live with a lie (or inflated #'s)... I just wanted to be sure of how I was reading the #'s, what people had done, as well as Hameed's base/test bolt ons.
I tried to do a little research on the WRX's... I take it that the APS turbos are huge to say the least (then again isn't the GT35?) but what is the scec c motor? What would the EVO equiv be? I thought thay looked the same @276hp... I guess I'm wondering why even w/ race gas, boost and tuning Bob would be down 30whp. Is it the turbo specs? I didn't see a compressor map for the GT35 but the DR65 does look like a beast. I know they have IC's for our car that are supposed to be very good (and easy on the pocketbook) but how about their turbo kits? Why haven't I heard more on them, are they good? I guess to spool that 65 like the WRX we would need to have a built & stroked engine huh?
I tried to do a little research on the WRX's... I take it that the APS turbos are huge to say the least (then again isn't the GT35?) but what is the scec c motor? What would the EVO equiv be? I thought thay looked the same @276hp... I guess I'm wondering why even w/ race gas, boost and tuning Bob would be down 30whp. Is it the turbo specs? I didn't see a compressor map for the GT35 but the DR65 does look like a beast. I know they have IC's for our car that are supposed to be very good (and easy on the pocketbook) but how about their turbo kits? Why haven't I heard more on them, are they good? I guess to spool that 65 like the WRX we would need to have a built & stroked engine huh?
Last edited by Got Boost?; Aug 9, 2005 at 06:32 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,858
Likes: 0
From: Work - New York, Alaska, Mexico or the Caribbean. -Home - Tx Hill Country
Originally Posted by Got Boost?
I tried to do a little research on the WRX's... I take it that the APS turbos are huge to say the least (then again isn't the GT35?) but what is the scec c motor? What would the EVO equiv be?
Originally Posted by Got Boost?
I guess I'm wondering why even w/ race gas, boost and tuning Bob would be down 30whp. Is it the turbo specs? I didn't see a compressor map for the GT35 but the DR65 does look like a beast.
Originally Posted by Got Boost?
I know they have IC's for our car that are supposed to be very good (and easy on the pocketbook) but how about their turbo kits? Why haven't I heard more on them, are they good? I guess to spool that 65 like the WRX we would need to have a built & stroked engine huh? 

Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RedLineSpeed
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
25
Sep 19, 2010 09:36 PM




