Notices

Virtual Dyno - Free -

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 7, 2011 | 10:28 AM
  #1  
Widoww's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Virtual Dyno - Free -

http://www.bradbarnhill.com/projects/VirtualDyno/

Download takes 2 seconds, feel free to donate if you want fellas.

Using Cobb AP, or Tactrix cable, do some logs, throw in your car into the Virtual dyno software, load up your datalog.csv files and it will show what hp/tq etc you run in comparison with everyone else using it.

for example

UR FMIC 4.5 inch
UR UICP
UR Resonated Test Pipe
Ams Widemouth DownPipe
Grimmspeed 3 port BCS
Tomei Ti-C cat back
Stock turbo on 94 oct
Car Weight 3500lbs driver 180

313/348 16 degrees celcius outside. UPDATE : 328/364 warmer temps overlayed
Attached Thumbnails Virtual Dyno - Free --amsoverlay.jpg  

Last edited by Widoww; Sep 14, 2011 at 07:22 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2011 | 12:03 PM
  #2  
laksman91's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Derek, not to be a negative person but I'd say you definitely need a new tune/ new tuner. Your boost plot is terrible.
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2011 | 12:44 PM
  #3  
Widoww's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Yes sir!! Soon
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2011 | 03:12 PM
  #4  
stealthMR's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 1
From: CANADA
I have to agree with Laksman. The boost graph looks terrible. Look at my Virtual dyno graph. I'm hitting 26psi tapering to 19psi.

Our cars have similar mods:

AMS downpipe
3" straight through exhaust
AEM intake
GS 3port
AGP intercooler

341WHP/350WTQ

Reply
Old Sep 7, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #5  
Widoww's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Stealthmr your weight is way off ...if I put down your weight I end up with 360whp 400+tq lol, your car weights 3600 try that and edit ur post it'll change dramatically
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 06:00 AM
  #6  
stealthMR's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 1
From: CANADA
I don't want to turn this into a pissing contest, but really is 100lbs difference going give your car an extra 40WHP/50WTQ.

Power numbers aside, I just want to point out that your tuner could have done a better job at tuning your boost levels.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 06:43 AM
  #7  
Widoww's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Yeah don't goto Neetronics! They are bad, this car has zero mivec tuning done.

Working on a new tune now, I just wanted to see everyones numbers and how it runs. Who tunes u
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 09:29 AM
  #8  
stealthMR's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 1
From: CANADA
I'm glad you posted your Virtual dyno graph.

A friend of mine was looking at getting his GSR tuned locally. I almost suggest Neetronics because Magnus was too expensive, but after looking at your results, I don't think that's a good idea.

My car was etuned by Clipse3GT, same guy that tuned Laksman car.
Reply
Old Sep 8, 2011 | 09:44 AM
  #9  
Kracka's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 8,970
Likes: 17
From: Prosper, TX
Real dyno > Excel program

/thread

Reply
Old Sep 9, 2011 | 09:56 AM
  #10  
madgen's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Originally Posted by Kracka
Real dyno > Excel program
In every way, including co$$$t.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2011 | 10:27 PM
  #11  
Widoww's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Canada
UPDATE top of thread i overlayed with old tune from neetronics and now from ams, still not fully tuned but very close

Last edited by Widoww; Sep 14, 2011 at 07:23 PM.
Reply
Old Sep 14, 2011 | 07:25 PM
  #12  
laksman91's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 578
Likes: 0
From: Toronto, Canada
Awesome! good to see you had more to gain from the crappy tune
Reply
Old Sep 15, 2011 | 09:57 AM
  #13  
stealthMR's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 79
Likes: 1
From: CANADA
Boost graph looks 10x better now.

Are you doing you logs in SSport mode? The reason I ask, is because I use to do my logs in Normal mode and would get massive torque spikes. I'm pretty sure it was because the SST clutches were slipping during initial boost . Using SSport mode, I notice the torque curve looked alot smoother.
Reply
Old Sep 17, 2011 | 05:57 AM
  #14  
Widoww's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolving Member
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 332
Likes: 0
From: Canada
Sport asc off once,,was thinking super sport but to wait another 4 seconds every logg would suck I'll have to try it.

Your motor built right just seen ur vd graph 550dayum lolfp red gsc s2 same as me
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EVOlution561
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
6
Jan 15, 2024 05:14 PM
ziad
ECU Flash
642
Feb 5, 2022 08:27 PM
RallySport Direct
EvoX 'For Sale' Exterior Styling
85
Aug 4, 2017 03:32 PM
babaz7
General Engine Management / Tuning Forum
1
Oct 1, 2011 11:08 PM
sndm
04-06 Lancer Ralliart How To Requests / Questions / Tips
4
Jun 30, 2006 10:03 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:18 PM.