COBB Tuning AccessPORT EVOX maps are now available for the Injen Short Ram Intake (part No. SP1899P).

In our ongoing commitment to serve the EVOX community COBB Tuning has released maps for the Injen Short Ram intake. These maps are available in both Stage 1 and Stage 2 configurations for both 91 and 93 octane fuel grades as well as 91 ACN (Arizona, California, Nevada).


Stage 1

• Stage1+IN 91 Octane Stage1+SF for Stock Vehicles with Injen cold-air intake (CAI) system. 91 Octane fuel. +18% HP / +6.7% lb. ft.

• Stage1+IN 93 Octane Stage1+SF for Stock Vehicles with Injen cold-air intake (CAI) system. 93 Octane fuel. +19.3% HP / +9% lb. ft.

• Stage1+IN ACN91 Octane Stage1+SF for Stock Vehicles with Injen cold-air intake (CAI) system designed specifically for for AZ/CA/NV 91 Octane. +18% HP / +6.7% lb. ft.

Stage 2

• Stage2+IN 91 Octane Stage2 with Injen cold-air intake (CAI) system, using 91 Octane fuel. Requires turboback exhaust. +24% HP / +17% lb. ft. Require boost control system changes

• Stage2+IN 93 Octane Stage2 with Injen cold-air intake (CAI) system, using 93 Octane fuel. Requires turboback exhaust. +28% HP / +19% lb. ft. Require boost control system changes

• Stage2+IN ACN91 Octane Stage2 with Injen cold-air intake (CAI) system, designed specifically for AZ/CA/NV 91 Octane. Requires turboback exhaust. +22% HP / +15% lb. ft. Require boost control system changes

These new maps can be found on the EVO X AccessPORT map download page.

For more information visit the COBB Tuning website, email us at info@cobbtuning.com or call 801-713-0035.

COBB Tuning AccessPORT: Access the potential!

 

Forgive my ignorance, but is there a difference in adjustments for the maps for the Injen CAI vs. the Injen SRI? It looks like the two intakes share the same map; you have the maps described as CAI vs. short ram. I checked the maps on cobb's site to confirm. Also, I couldn't find the intakes for the Evo X on Injen's site...very poor product layout...there's an intake section for sport compact vs. product sections for each type of car.
It would seem like you would need to engineer at least a little difference due to MAF placement, pipe length, degree drop of intake air from filter placement (fenderwell vs. underhood), etc. Otherwise, what's the reason to develop maps for AEM's intake vs. Injen's; they are similar enough to warrant the same arguement.

Thanks for your time and info!