Notices

All new FP6466TZ!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 11, 2014 | 09:26 AM
  #16  
srt4killer's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: reno, nevada
What's the pounds per min on it
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2014 | 09:32 AM
  #17  
evo_1320's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: Tenn
I love my 6466 turbo
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2014 | 09:46 AM
  #18  
Faisalm's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 851
Likes: 2
From: US
Originally Posted by srt4killer
What's the pounds per min on it
Answer:

Originally Posted by Michael @ FP
It's closer to a 3794HTA than a 3586HTA thanks to the new HTZ aero package. It'll spool quicker than the 3794HTA while flowing about the same.


-Michael
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2014 | 10:28 AM
  #19  
deylag's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,828
Likes: 148
From: Milpitas, CA
Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX
Percision 6466

Comp 64.39mm ind/86.61mm exd

Turb 74.17mm ind/66mm exd

FP 6466TZ

Comp 64mm ind/ 88mm exd

Turb 72.6 ind/ 66.3mm exd


FP HTA86

Comp 62.1MM Inducer / 86MM Exd

Turb 67.7MM Inducer / 62.2MM Exd

Based on the specs it would seem FP's 6466TZ falls inbetween the hta86 and Percisions 6466 in terms of flow capability. Spool comparison between Per 6466 and FP 6466TZ remains to be seen. On paper the 6466TZ should spool faster, but it's also dependent upon the aero and weight comparison of both Turbine wheels. In for real world data.
Awesome thanks for posting this comparison. It helps with the decision making. Now to wait for a dyno run to pop up.
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2014 | 10:41 AM
  #20  
itsmrrizz2you's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 655
Likes: 1
From: queens
Awesome
Reply
Old Apr 11, 2014 | 05:11 PM
  #21  
RyuEvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1
From: Florida
Originally Posted by deylag
Awesome thanks for posting this comparison. It helps with the decision making. Now to wait for a dyno run to pop up.
I'm just waiting to see a boost plot of when this thing hit's 30psi in 3rd gear. If it spools slightly quicker then Percisions 6466 and is capable of 850whp on a 2.0L with no more then 44psi peak boost I'm in.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 08:31 AM
  #22  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX
I'm just waiting to see a boost plot of when this thing hit's 30psi in 3rd gear. If it spools slightly quicker then Percisions 6466 and is capable of 850whp on a 2.0L with no more then 44psi peak boost I'm in.
Now that's pretty damn specific lol
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 12:40 PM
  #23  
RyuEvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1
From: Florida
I know what I want and I'm not willing to settle. On paper it looks like that's what this turbo will do. I've run only FP turbos on my car up to this point. If I don't see the results I'm looking for by December, I will be buying my first Percision turbo.

Last edited by RyuEvoIX; Apr 12, 2014 at 12:42 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 12:55 PM
  #24  
Migsubishi's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 13
From: Tampa bay area
Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX
I know what I want and I'm not willing to settle. On paper it looks like that's what this turbo will do. I've run only FP turbos on my car up to this point. If I don't see the results I'm looking for by December, I will be buying my first Percision turbo.
Damn, yeah that's pretty much what I did. I feel the same as you, if this turbo proves to be better I'm all over it. As for now I'll just run what I got.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 01:18 PM
  #25  
RyuEvoIX's Avatar
Evolved Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,126
Likes: 1
From: Florida
The end game for me is a turbo that will get me to 151-154mph trap speeds, 9.2-9.3 1/4 ET, and hit 30psi no later then 5,350 rpms. Best I have gotten out of it so far is 145mph with FP's HTA3582.
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 01:19 PM
  #26  
srt4killer's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: reno, nevada
mine will ether go on a buschur aluminum rod 2.0 or a er slr 2.2 should do good
Reply
Old Apr 12, 2014 | 06:53 PM
  #27  
420a-t's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 735
Likes: 1
From: Idaho Falls, ID
I'd love to see some dyno numbers or a trap speed with this turbo vs a 6466. For those of you that have one on order, get your **** done!!!

Does anyone at FP have any type of real-world numbers?
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 10:21 AM
  #28  
srt4killer's Avatar
Newbie
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: reno, nevada
just need to decide if I'm going ff,top mount or bottom mount
Reply
Old Apr 13, 2014 | 11:40 AM
  #29  
Danielbo91's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
From: Fort Worth
Nice I want one for my evo price is good too
Reply
Old Apr 14, 2014 | 02:43 PM
  #30  
MrLith's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 715
Likes: 17
From: Welly NZ
Originally Posted by RyuEvoIX
Percision 6466

Comp 64.39mm ind/86.61mm exd

Turb 74.17mm ind/66mm exd

FP 6466TZ

Comp 64mm ind/ 88mm exd

Turb 72.6 ind/ 66.3mm exd

Based on the specs it would seem FP's 6466TZ falls inbetween the hta86 and Percisions 6466 in terms of flow capability. Spool comparison between Per 6466 and FP 6466TZ remains to be seen. On paper the 6466TZ should spool faster, but it's also dependent upon the aero and weight comparison of both Turbine wheels. In for real world data.
On the turbine wheel flow potential side of things - it looks like the 6466TZ uses the same turbine wheel as the HTA3794, based on the blurbs on FP's site... though that isn't specifically confirmed. If it is the same, then we know it's capable of allowing similar power numbers to the Precision 66mm turbine.

Definitely looking forward to seeing testing of this unit happening by someone somewhere, looks like it has potential
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:27 AM.