Competitive dyno testing....again.
You're an animal
Absolutely amazing!
Very very cool stuff.
1. This car was just sold. Obviously the owner took off his MBC before letting it go and the car was on stock boost. As David mentioned, the car was tuned by Dynoflash with a mbc that is now gone. So the car was boosting 19psi (stock) in the baseline pull, when it was tuned for 21 or 22 psi. Not exactly a test case.
2. Just getting rid of two resonators and the Cat should yield 20whp easily.
3. So, you raised the boost 3psi, removed the CAT and resonators and gained 40 hp. Why is that even news, let alone "amazing."
smog,
The questions is with all the crap done to your car in your signature why is 539 whp and 491 ft lbs amazing?! hahaha Those are even Dynojet numbers! hahahaha
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
The questions is with all the crap done to your car in your signature why is 539 whp and 491 ft lbs amazing?! hahaha Those are even Dynojet numbers! hahahaha
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Originally Posted by Smogrunner
Some people are so easily impressed.
1. This car was just sold. Obviously the owner took off his MBC before letting it go and the car was on stock boost. As David mentioned, the car was tuned by Dynoflash with a mbc that is now gone. So the car was boosting 19psi (stock) in the baseline pull, when it was tuned for 21 or 22 psi. Not exactly a test case.
2. Just getting rid of two resonators and the Cat should yield 20whp easily.
3. So, you raised the boost 3psi, removed the CAT and resonators and gained 40 hp. Why is that even news, let alone "amazing."
1. This car was just sold. Obviously the owner took off his MBC before letting it go and the car was on stock boost. As David mentioned, the car was tuned by Dynoflash with a mbc that is now gone. So the car was boosting 19psi (stock) in the baseline pull, when it was tuned for 21 or 22 psi. Not exactly a test case.
2. Just getting rid of two resonators and the Cat should yield 20whp easily.
3. So, you raised the boost 3psi, removed the CAT and resonators and gained 40 hp. Why is that even news, let alone "amazing."
I don't disagree with you, notec or smog. Smog has just been riding my butt lately and I'm getting tired of it.
The power should be up, it was up, which was the point of the thread and the tune still is not been done for this application.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
The power should be up, it was up, which was the point of the thread and the tune still is not been done for this application.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Originally Posted by davidbuschur
I don't disagree with you, notec or smog. Smog has just been riding my butt lately and I'm getting tired of it.
The power should be up, it was up, which was the point of the thread and the tune still is not been done for this application.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
The power should be up, it was up, which was the point of the thread and the tune still is not been done for this application.
David Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
I understand dave didnt work any magic voodoo to get this kind of power, but if to take anything from this comparassion its that sometimes simplier (and cheaper- even used and dented parts) are better.
A downpipe advertising that it has 2 resonators and will be a quiter sound, could def make a noob jump on it- not telling you that this takes away from hp
A downpipe advertising that it has 2 resonators and will be a quiter sound, could def make a noob jump on it- not telling you that this takes away from hp
The car has a bone stock 2003 turbo, man, 02 housing etc. on it. The car is very very mild.
Daivd Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Daivd Buschur
www.buschurracing.com
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
StreetThisEvo
Evo Dyno Tuning / Results
30
Jun 13, 2009 06:09 PM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
141
Aug 25, 2008 07:54 AM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
62
Apr 23, 2007 06:19 PM
David Buschur
Evo Engine / Turbo / Drivetrain
165
May 6, 2006 08:37 AM



lbs.

