Tales From the dyno: S-AFC vs. XFlash
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Tales From the dyno: S-AFC vs. XFlash
03 EVO with full exhaust (no cat), bov, mbc and intake
Custom-tuned S_afc (by another dyno tuning shop) vs. v330 XFlash (with our boost fitting-- MBC removed)
attached graphs:
whp/torque
boost/afr
Custom-tuned S_afc (by another dyno tuning shop) vs. v330 XFlash (with our boost fitting-- MBC removed)
attached graphs:
whp/torque
boost/afr
Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Feb 23, 2005 at 08:11 PM.
Trending Topics
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by jj_008
I am assuming the axis on the left is psi and the black line is the SAFC. It sure looks like the black line doesn't come close to the 21 psi line.
That's what it was tuned for by the dyno shop. Running more boost, on 91 oct without ignition control (S-AFCs rule! ) is pointless. Results in run to run inconsistency and knock retard.Shiv
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
That's because it runs 20psi That's what it was tuned for by the dyno shop. Running more boost, on 91 oct without ignition control (S-AFCs rule! ) is pointless. Results in run to run inconsistency and knock retard.
Shiv
That's what it was tuned for by the dyno shop. Running more boost, on 91 oct without ignition control (S-AFCs rule! ) is pointless. Results in run to run inconsistency and knock retard.Shiv
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by Widebandphillip
Kinda unfair since you ran more boost than the afc. About 3 psi more.
