Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

MR vs GSR

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 09:26 AM
  #16  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
IMO the gearing on both trannys (5 and 6 speed) isn't as good as it could be, especially the final drive ratio, so personally I don't think the 6 speed is really an advantage. For me the MR stacks up like this:

+ Bilstein shocks
+ Vortex Generator
= 6 speed
- wheels (I hate the look of 'em - painted, yuck)
- cheesy gauges (I would end up pulling them out)
- price tag

l8r)
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 09:42 AM
  #17  
newcar168's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfor, NJ
COME ON!!!! ALL THE evo Viii in japan use six speed tranny, this is the trend now, this is the one transmission you must have on the track or circuit (what we call in japan) I have so many best motoring video, the GT car drivers they say that six speed is faster on the straight way, and all the evo viii you see in japan they use six speed, it is the must have now on the track, they still offer five speed version, but that's only for ppl wants to save money. there is nothing wrong with six speed, i drive a 05 MR and I own a 03 white evo, i know how two cars drives, six speed is better, 5 speed is also very good, but the ratio and the extra gear is def. better. with the extra gear the crusing rpm is also lower, re acceleration on the highway is also better. every shift hit the strong power band but the five speed ratio is wide between 4th and 5th. it's just we don't have 6 speed on all the evo, that doesn't mean it's not good. remember all tranny are from JAPAN six speed is the newer tranny from mitsu, if its not good they wont even make it !!!
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 09:45 AM
  #18  
newcar168's Avatar
Account Disabled
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
From: Rutherfor, NJ
the MR has aluminum roof, light weight door beam, according to the best motoring international, this helps lower the ceter of gravity, you are wrong about the six speed, all the pro driver on track use six speed now, it's just you dont have it on your evo you are jealous.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 09:55 AM
  #19  
Ludikraut's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,224
Likes: 0
From: 41° 59' N, 87° 54' W
Originally Posted by newcar168
the MR has aluminum roof, light weight door beam, according to the best motoring international, this helps lower the ceter of gravity, you are wrong about the six speed, all the pro driver on track use six speed now, it's just you dont have it on your evo you are jealous.
Who's jealous? FWIW, stock vs. stock the MR is, of course faster on a track, not only due to the 6 speed, but also due to the better suspension, which makes up for the fact that the MR is actually heavier than a GSR. However, for the difference in cost, you can take a GSR and make it waaaaay faster than a stock MR, which is why I've always said that the MR isn't worth it ... to me.

l8r)
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #20  
AznFlip's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Originally Posted by newcar168
the MR has aluminum roof, light weight door beam, according to the best motoring international, this helps lower the ceter of gravity, you are wrong about the six speed, all the pro driver on track use six speed now, it's just you dont have it on your evo you are jealous.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 11:05 AM
  #21  
AznFlip's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Don't call USDM EVO a GSR cuz it is not.

Last edited by AznFlip; Mar 29, 2005 at 11:11 AM.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 11:20 AM
  #22  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Can we get this thread moved out of this forum since it doesn't really belong here? There are a lot of e-thuggZ coming in here to spit their two cents.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 03:32 PM
  #23  
Slowride's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Southeast US
Originally Posted by Noize
The physical dimensions of the six speed box are the same as the five speed box, but with an extra gear inside. To do this, Mitsubishi had to compromise some of the cooling properties of the six speed tranny.
What evidence do you have that Mitsu had to compromise the cooling on the 6-speed?

You really shouldn't reply so sarcastically on things you don't know about. Shiv picks up the phone at his own company all the time.
Like I said, that's not what I've heard. At any rate, I'm sure he doesn't want to play everyone's Mr. Evo Answerman. If I was contemplating Vishnu mods I might give him a call, but I'm not going to call just to settle an e-argument.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #24  
jdc's Avatar
jdc
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: seattle
Originally Posted by Ludikraut
Who's jealous? FWIW, stock vs. stock the MR is, of course faster on a track, not only due to the 6 speed, but also due to the better suspension, which makes up for the fact that the MR is actually heavier than a GSR. However, for the difference in cost, you can take a GSR and make it waaaaay faster than a stock MR, which is why I've always said that the MR isn't worth it ... to me.

l8r)
well if you mod the MR, then it will be waaaaaay faster than a stock base evo (stop calling it GSR, thats only in japan). so the MR is worth it... to me
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 04:00 PM
  #25  
leif's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 763
Likes: 0
From: bay area, ca
Originally Posted by newcar168
the MR has aluminum roof, light weight door beam, according to the best motoring international, this helps lower the ceter of gravity, you are wrong about the six speed, all the pro driver on track use six speed now, it's just you dont have it on your evo you are jealous.
<- not jealous nor even close to being jealous.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #26  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by Slowride
What evidence do you have that Mitsu had to compromise the cooling on the 6-speed?
-Its the exact same size casing with extra parts inside.
-Less overall oil capacity.
-Cooling fins added to the underside of the MR gearbox.
-The Vishnu MR's perfectly operational 6 speed was removed and replaced by a 5 speed "under recommendation" for the 25 Hours of Thunderhill.

You can take that last piece of info however you want to. My car is not that powerful, but it makes a solid 100whp+ more than it did stock. I stated it earlier, but will say so again: At my power level, I'd still prefer the six speed for the superior fifth gear ratio. With any substantial turbocharger upgrade however, I'd have more faith in the proven longevity of the 5 speed.

Like I said, that's not what I've heard. At any rate, I'm sure he doesn't want to play everyone's Mr. Evo Answerman. If I was contemplating Vishnu mods I might give him a call, but I'm not going to call just to settle an e-argument.
What you've "heard" is in direct contradiction to what I've experienced several times first hand. Do you really care to continue this tirade? If so, please put some evidence on the table as to why the 6 speed is physically more robust than the 5 speed and stop wasting technical bandwitdth with your Shiv gossip and self-consolation about your transmission.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 04:34 PM
  #27  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Originally Posted by EvoNineMR
well if you mod the MR, then it will be waaaaaay faster than a stock base evo

Last edited by Noize; Mar 29, 2005 at 04:42 PM.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 04:39 PM
  #28  
badlooser's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 704
Likes: 1
From: west palm beach,Fl
Originally Posted by grendel
Just trying to get a few peoples thoughts on which evo is the better all around or more tunable of the two. My buddy has the chance to buy a low mile 03 GSR, or a new MR that they have at huggins here in dfw. He asked what I would do and I really have no idea, so I figured what better place to ask than here!

so if you could buy either or, than is it the 03 with 10 grand left over for mods? or the 05 MR with no mods. I would take the 03 and mod it to 500whp and call it a day. But it depends what is important to you ?
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 05:03 PM
  #29  
mrbkkt1's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,464
Likes: 1
From: Aiea, Hawaii
i am very happy w/ my 05 GSR. SSL.
Old Mar 29, 2005 | 05:30 PM
  #30  
Slowride's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
From: Southeast US
Originally Posted by Noize
-Its the exact same size casing with extra parts inside.
-Less overall oil capacity.
-Cooling fins added to the underside of the MR gearbox.
None of that is evidence that the 6-speed has compromised cooling. For example, if the 5-speed was significantly over-engineered in that respect, it's entirely possible that the cooling is still more than sufficient with the added cooling fins. I don't know that for a fact, but I also don't that it's not a fact, either.

-The Vishnu MR's perfectly operational 6 speed was removed and replaced by a 5 speed "under recommendation" for the 25 Hours of Thunderhill.

You can take that last piece of info however you want to.
Depends entirely upon who made the recommendation and why.

What you've "heard" is in direct contradiction to what I've experienced several times first hand.
OK, cool. Maybe the situation has improved since then. Maybe Evo customers get better responses than Subaru customers. I dunno and I don't care because I'm still not going to call up Shiv and ask him why the 6-speed sucks.

Do you really care to continue this tirade?
This is not a tirade. You're the one who's getting all excited.

If so, please put some evidence on the table as to why the 6 speed is physically more robust than the 5 speed...
I never claimed it was more robust--or even as robust as the 5-speed. But someone claimed it was less robust. I still have seen zero evidence that it's any less reliable.

and stop wasting technical bandwitdth with your Shiv gossip
Sheesh, I made one remark which I clearly labeled as hearsay. Grow up. Shiv is a big boy and he can probably defend himself.

and self-consolation about your transmission.
I'm only looking for evidence of the claims being made here. I guess if the Lord God Shiv hinted that the 6-speed is inferior I should just accept it as given?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:18 PM.