Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

THANK YOU SHIV for an amazing tune!!

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:20 PM
  #46  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
im gonna try to stay with stock intake manifold and see how that works out if nessacary ill get the sheet metal one.. my goal is a perfectly stock engine bay so when i get pulled over i can say teh car is bone stock with exhaust.

if i do sell them i will let you know first for sure noize.

im goin with the 3037 kit.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:28 PM
  #47  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
has anyone ever ACTUALLY blown their headgasket due to streatching head bolts on anything less than a 30psi gt35r? ive read about arp studs messing up with the "one at a time" method, but never actually read that the stock studs stretch.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:36 PM
  #48  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
i heard that is is a rather complicated opperation.. is it worth the risks if i only plan to have 400-420 whp on shiv's dyno? (approx 500 whp on normal dyno jet)
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:43 PM
  #49  
Dyno4mance's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,378
Likes: 0
From: NW Georgia
Originally Posted by gsujeff55
has anyone ever ACTUALLY blown their headgasket due to streatching head bolts on anything less than a 30psi gt35r? ive read about arp studs messing up with the "one at a time" method, but never actually read that the stock studs stretch.
Before I started doing the "one at a time method" I checked everywhere including England for any reports of failures due to doing head studs this way....I found no accounts of any problems...
More likely is people over torquing the studs....doing this will not give extra clamping force as people tend to believe but only brings the bolts closer to tensile yield as the aluminum head expands...
Where did you hear about any problems with replacing the head bolts with ARP headstuds?
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 05:54 PM
  #50  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
i just assumed that it was the thing to do as lots of people making semi-high power are running them. If you guys dont think they are nessacary then ill sell my studs and bolts.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 06:00 PM
  #51  
Noize's Avatar
EvoM Administrator
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 8,849
Likes: 138
From: Franklin, TN
Thanks Asitha! Can't wait to see the car with the 3037S on it.
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #52  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
Originally Posted by Dyno4mance
Before I started doing the "one at a time method" I checked everywhere including England for any reports of failures due to doing head studs this way....I found no accounts of any problems...
More likely is people over torquing the studs....doing this will not give extra clamping force as people tend to believe but only brings the bolts closer to tensile yield as the aluminum head expands...
Where did you hear about any problems with replacing the head bolts with ARP headstuds?
I read a couple different things on here where someone folks had problems with the ARP studs and they all used the one at a time method. Im not really concerned with that though, what im more interested in finding out is if the stockers are actually in need of replacement....or if thats just one of those "you should probably do this mods". Any known failures of the stockers?
Old Apr 24, 2005 | 11:24 PM
  #53  
marksae's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 1
From: SF, CA
Originally Posted by BOOSTEZ
Perhaps concerning the money.

I would think that one can probably get the same whp by getting hard intake pipes to/from the intercooler (and intake to the turbo) and then retune for the higher boost increase with those. That would be $250-$300 and one wouldn't have to worry about the labor charges (which are drastic for changing out that turbo).

-M
If you're looking for return on investment, the IC pipes and hard intake pipe won't give you much. I have the Helix IC pipes and noticed maybe only <5 hp gain on the butt dyno. It only made a subtle difference. From the dyno charts and everyone's feedback, it sounds like the 10.5 hotside is a very worthwhile mod that gives a lot of return on investment.

You're making the hotside install a lot harder than it really needs to be. Installing one looks like it would take around the same amount of labor as doing an ic pipe install.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 12:49 AM
  #54  
GREDDY's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Northglenn, CO.
The 10.5 hotside mod is a worth while mod. Do it, just do it!
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 12:13 PM
  #55  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
i need to get a 1/4 mile run in before i install the turbo kit.. i think im going to do it this wednesday.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 12:34 PM
  #56  
IE Evo's Avatar
Evolved Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,798
Likes: 0
From: North Mexico (Inland Empire)
Originally Posted by Vishnu_Evo8
i need to get a 1/4 mile run in before i install the turbo kit.. i think im going to do it this wednesday.
Beat Smoggie's 11.9 bra.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 01:27 PM
  #57  
Vishnu_Evo8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,610
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
i hope so.. but i spin the tires too much right now with the stockers.. i need to get my ra-1's and my ssrs out of leifs house.
Old Apr 25, 2005 | 01:30 PM
  #58  
gsujeff55's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,838
Likes: 1
From: GA
im working on smoggies time...got some new tires on the way then im going to hit the track.
 




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:13 AM.