Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

shiv@vishnu account disabled?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:05 AM
  #76  
AtO-MiX's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
From: san antonio,TX
^ HA. Even though he explained him self he still doesnt get it i mean he called the guy a *****.
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:09 AM
  #77  
Speedlimit's Avatar
Admin Emeritus
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,239
Likes: 101
From: NR Reading PA
To all,

We are not going to continue this via website proxies. If you want to discuss the relationship between these vendors via links, then please do so on their respective website, but not here. The vendor wars are over on Evom and Ali has made it very clear that those who want continue with it will be removed. Thanks.


Please read this:

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...22#post2903522

PM me if you any questions. Thanks.



Speedlimit...
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:16 AM
  #78  
geminix3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: sfba
Originally Posted by SuperHatch
I saved the first 100 posts before it got closed if anyone wants to enjoy it, I found it humerous. And from what I hear, it got worse after post 100!

yeah, i'd like to see those, too. could you PM me or send by email?

i really prefer to see how these these develop with my own eyes, and this must have been a doozy. it's amazing how fast revisionism distorts the actual events, and deleting the threads prevents any real forensic analysis.

some guy in one of the other threads about this actually referred to the bad blood going back to the "good old days" of 2003, and how "someone" apparently used multiple screen names to pose as customers to pimp his own company. another guy just last week had no idea that "someone" was a lawyer, or at least posing as one, as recently as, well, the "good old days" of 2003, before revealing his true, spandex-clad identity as Tooning Man....

i think i need to run a search on Alfriedesq, see how many of the old threads are left. all the really juicy ones were dleted, of course, just like this one.... but it'd still be fun to post a link.... maybe to nasioc, too.....
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:31 AM
  #79  
geminix3's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: sfba
doh-

sorry, SL. typed thru your post.

will do....


ps- your link 404s
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:39 AM
  #80  
David@Vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
I have the threads saved as well. We're thinking about hosting them online for all to see. It's really speaks poorly of the management that Shiv is being made an example of along side with the likes of Dave and Al (who routinely crossed the line of decency, over and over again, with very big steps). If they want to say that this punishment is due to behavior going months back, that's fair enough. However, punishment should always be commensurate with the crime. That being said, why they ALL have the equal 2 weeks of "time out" is beyond me. I don't ever recall Shiv name-calling any other vendor, dropping bombs in other vendor forums, physically threatening other evom members or slinging out racial slurs. Yet he is being punished right along side with those who do.
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:45 AM
  #81  
blonde's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by David@Vishnu
I have the threads saved as well. We're thinking about hosting them online for all to see. It's really speaks poorly of the management that Shiv is being made an example of along side with the likes of Dave and Al (who routinely crossed the line of decency, over and over again, with very big steps). If they want to say that this punishment is due to behavior going months back, that's fair enough. However, punishment should always be commensurate with the crime. That being said, why they ALL have the equal 2 weeks of "time out" is beyond me. I don't ever recall Shiv name-calling any other vendor, dropping bombs in other vendor forums, physically threatening other evom members or slinging out racial slurs. Yet he is being punished right along side with those who do.
let it go David, you know exactly why all of this went the way it did. you know as well as i do why Shiv got the timeout so as much as i respect your loyality, this is just not needed. and don't post those threads because they were deleted for a reason.
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:46 AM
  #82  
nbpal4000's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 404
Likes: 0
From: on earth
Hey faresest korean, Im korean too so you'd probably know what it is like to live in a west culture with some east customs within....but the whole Hulk Crazy has nothing to do with Al's northern stereotical attitudes, you dont call your customers that they are bunch of loser whether you are from north south east or west....
oops I just read the SL's post. ok I will stop here
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:57 AM
  #83  
res04's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
and to think, if all the parties involved spent more time tuning cars than slinging insults on the web we could all have faster, smoother running Evos.
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 09:58 AM
  #84  
David@Vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by blonde
let it go David, you know exactly why all of this went the way it did. you know as well as i do why Shiv got the timeout so as much as i respect your loyality, this is just not needed. and don't post those threads because they were deleted for a reason.
See Blonde, this is why I disgree with the management (yourself included). This is not about layalty. Let's just try to answer the following questions:

1) Did Shiv bash another vendor?
Answer: Not recently. And even when he did, he tried to keep things technical. And he NEVER resorted to profanity, insults or racial slurs.
Did Dave and Al? Yes, yes yes.

2) Did Shiv ever threater to physically harm other evom members?
Answer: No.
Did Dave and Al? Absolutely. They enjoyed doing that.

3) Did Shiv ever interfere with other vendor threads and self-promote himself?
Answer: No
Al and Dave: Absolutely.

Don't sweep these facts under the rug with blanket statements like "we all know why this happened". What we know is that all the threads have been removed from the visibility. But they have not been removed from existance. I have all the threads in question saved on my HD.

Do you really think Shiv conducted himself with the same level of indecency as Al and Dave? And if so, could you tell me when?
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:01 AM
  #85  
Event-Horizon's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 4
From: Atlanta, GA
I posted this lastnight in the thread that was deleted, luckily someone saved it:

It shows some examples of the forum rules Al broke lastnight in that ONE thread. This is not the first thread he has done it in either.

https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...81&postcount=8

Last edited by Event-Horizon; Mar 15, 2006 at 10:04 AM.
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:02 AM
  #86  
meanmud's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (74)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 1
From: The 1st State
Originally Posted by David@Vishnu
See Blonde, this is why I disgree with the management (yourself included). This is not about layalty. Let's just try to answer the following questions:

1) Did Shiv bash another vendor?
Answer: Not recently. And even when he did, he tried to keep things technical. And he NEVER resorted to profanity, insults or racial slurs.
Did Dave and Al? Yes, yes yes.

2) Did Shiv ever threater to physically harm other evom members?
Answer: No.
Did Dave and Al? Absolutely. They enjoyed doing that.

3) Did Shiv ever interfere with other vendor threads and self-promote himself?
Answer: No
Al and Dave: Absolutely.

Don't sweep these facts under the rug with blanket statements like "we all know why this happened". What we know is that all the threads have been removed from the visibility. But they have not been removed from existance. I have all the threads in question saved on my HD.

Do you really think Shiv conducted himself with the same level of indecency as Al and Dave? And if so, could you tell me when?
This post needs to be echoed - I'm in TOTAL accord
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:12 AM
  #87  
tkklemann's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: Charleston, SC
Can someone send me the thread as well?

I am bored as hell at work and need some entertaining reading.
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:12 AM
  #88  
blonde's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 0
edited- i should not have posted it or take part of this thread. i am sorry..

Last edited by blonde; Mar 15, 2006 at 11:45 AM.
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:15 AM
  #89  
Big Boost's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 381
Likes: 0
From: In my house
Originally Posted by David@Vishnu
See Blonde, this is why I disgree with the management (yourself included). This is not about layalty. Let's just try to answer the following questions:

1) Did Shiv bash another vendor?
Answer: Not recently. And even when he did, he tried to keep things technical. And he NEVER resorted to profanity, insults or racial slurs.
Did Dave and Al? Yes, yes yes.

2) Did Shiv ever threater to physically harm other evom members?
Answer: No.
Did Dave and Al? Absolutely. They enjoyed doing that.

3) Did Shiv ever interfere with other vendor threads and self-promote himself?
Answer: No
Al and Dave: Absolutely.

Don't sweep these facts under the rug with blanket statements like "we all know why this happened". What we know is that all the threads have been removed from the visibility. But they have not been removed from existance. I have all the threads in question saved on my HD.

Do you really think Shiv conducted himself with the same level of indecency as Al and Dave? And if so, could you tell me when?
^ I have to agree on this one as well. I read the posts before it was deleted and Shiv, asked a number of times to move the thread or have it deleted because he knew what was going to happen.

I can understand why Al was given a timeout, but I think David & Shiv where given one was really just to make a point.....
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:20 AM
  #90  
David@Vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,180
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by blonde
wrong, Shiv used name calling many times in the past and even if he does have a more witty way of fighting, he still instigates alot and have used racial slurs many times in the past
Well, I guess we have a different definition of "name-calling" then. As for him using racial slurs, Could you please elaborate? That's a pretty big accusation to make.

HELL YEAH!!!! Shiv has jumped into Al's threads so many times and promoted himself
This is the crux of the problem here. It seems like many people can't distinguish between objective fact and self-promotion. If objective fact self-promotes, it does so because it is objective fact. Until the management acquires the ability to differentiate between objective fact and inter-vendor bashing, nothing will change.

yes i do. altough they are different, all of them broke the rules so many times even after being warned about it many many times.
I guess that is subject to interpretation. I respect you man. But I don't have to agree with you.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:31 AM.