Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

I got tuned*Updated w/Graph...

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 03:29 PM
  #16  
559EVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: LOS ANGELES CA
How is that APS twin vent bov working with your setup and tune?
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 04:24 PM
  #17  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by alan678
Dang...you made that much in an VIII? There was a IX on the dyno before me and he only had TBEw/test pipe and Drop-in just like you and left making 293 to the wheels in the same temps...Could something be wrong with my setup??? Is there anything I can check to see if something is wrong??

And by increase timing you mean more towards the (+) side??? Cause if that’s the case then no...More timing was pulled away in the map when the car was richened up...
Here is my dyno sheet. The blue line is base, red line is 91 octane and green line is 100 octane. My car spent two hours on the dyno to get these numbers. It did 31 dyno runs It is possible that the amount of time that the car spent on the dyno paid dividends in power output.

The AFR was 11:1 on the 91 octane map and a really really conservative 11.2:1 on the 100 octane map.

The correction factor was 1:04 which is close to what you got. Uncorrected the power would have been 287 whp on 91 octane and 300 whp on 100 octane.

Attached Thumbnails I got tuned*Updated w/Graph...-my_dyno.jpg  
Old Aug 10, 2006 | 04:32 PM
  #18  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by alan678
Thanks for the tid bit on the correction...

And I do have a high flow cat on my car...AMS 3" TBE and thier HFC...

So Chevron 91 Oct and HFC are robbing me...what else can i do to help my car out before going turbo kit???

I also had someone on another forum tell me that the dips in my graph are a bit odd...what could cause that???
There might be two things going on here:

1. A test pipe will more than likely free 10 hp over the HFC. Make sure that you get a 3 inch test pipe and not one that pretends to be 3 inch like the one I got

2. According to Shiv, the Evo likes the 76 gasoline best. Alfred @ TT told to fill from a 76 station before I dynoed. Since I have dynoed I have only used gas from a 76 station. Recently, I have been mixxing 100 octane with 91 octane to get the desired 93 octane.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 02:58 AM
  #19  
reed32's Avatar
Newbie
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
From: pitts,ca
Originally Posted by alan678
First of all I want to thank Alfred and his crew at Tuning Technologies for making this dyno tune possible ...I am extremely happy with the customer service and will continue to use them as my car gets more mods...

Here is the down and dirty on my Dyno Day...

Conditions on the Dyno: between 108 and 110 Degrees (Yeah, flipping hot), 4% Humidity

Blue lines are from the Vishnu Baseline Map and Red lines are the tuned results:


I am extremely happy with my results from today...with the temps in the 110's and a Cat restricting flow, 305 WHP is not bad at all...Also turns out that the car was running too lean then pig rich (That’s what I get for trusting a narrow band Auto meter A/F meter...lol...wideband is next)...

On the 91 Oct baseline map from Vishnu (Blue lines) the car peaked: 294 WHP @ 6800 RPM and 268 Ft. Lbs. @ 5200 RPM w/ A/F ratios ranging from 13.1 low end to 12.0 high end

On the 91 Oct tuned map from Tuning Technologies (Red lines) the car peaked: 305 WHP @ 6800 RPM and 279 Ft. Lbs. @ 5000 RPM w/ A/F ratios ranging from 12.0 low end to 11.1 high end

Gains within the power band are as follow:

Low End
27 WHP and 33 Ft. Lbs. @ 4200 RPMs / AFR went from 13.1 to 12.0

Mid Range
16 WHP and 17 Ft. Lbs. @ 5300 RPMs / AFR went from 12.8 to 11.7

High End
18 WHP and 15 Ft. Lbs. @ 6800 RPMs / AFR went from 12.0 to 11.1

All comments, remarks and questions are more than welcomed...
man, shiv does so aggressive tunning on pump. most likly you car was knocking. if you run shiv's tune then your car won't last long on pump. if thats were to be a race gas tune then i could see big numbers from it. turbo cars on 91 should be tuned 11.8's at most. great numbers on the new tune.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 07:24 AM
  #20  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
I would still like to see your fuel and timing maps. Especially the 100 octane map.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 01:31 PM
  #21  
alan678's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: La Jolla, CA
Originally Posted by reed32
man, shiv does so aggressive tunning on pump. most likly you car was knocking. if you run shiv's tune then your car won't last long on pump. if thats were to be a race gas tune then i could see big numbers from it. turbo cars on 91 should be tuned 11.8's at most. great numbers on the new tune.
Yeah my car was knocking pretty bad...sums up to 20 on evo scan...

Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske
Please post your before and after maps.
Here are my maps...

This is the baseline map which is found on the Vishnu site...


Here are the maps after the tune...

Last edited by alan678; Aug 11, 2006 at 01:38 PM.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 02:16 PM
  #22  
Jeff_Jeske's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (66)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,358
Likes: 7
From: On the track
Everything looks pretty good except your timing is more restrictive than almost any other tune I've seen.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 03:34 PM
  #23  
alan678's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: La Jolla, CA
What do you mean dude???
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 03:51 PM
  #24  
jrsimon27's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 6
From: C.A Honduras!
he means that they took away a lot of timing from the map
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 04:05 PM
  #25  
nj1266's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,254
Likes: 13
From: USA
Originally Posted by Jeff_Jeske
Everything looks pretty good except your timing is more restrictive than almost any other tune I've seen.
I agree with Jeff. There is some timing pulled from 500 to 3500 rpm. My TBE exhaust non-smart timing map that Alfred created is much less restrictive. Here it is:

Attached Thumbnails I got tuned*Updated w/Graph...-91_tt_timing.jpg  
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 04:59 PM
  #26  
snoop's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,136
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Something is not right here is I made more TQ without cams. I think you must have a stage1 timing since the cams are not really in picture at all. Most of the stage 1+ make around 315whp and over 300TQ on the TT dyno.

On the same DYNO with a stage 1 custom tune and no SMART I made.


I have a stage 1 (SHIV Tune)

HKS Exhaust
Helix DP
UR highflow cat
Fidanza Cam Gears
Walbro Fuel pump
K&N drop in filter
NGK Iriduim plugs



Here is my Car on 109 unleaded

So here is the dyno of my results of 100 octance custom tune running 109 Unleaded. The AF sensor came off at the end as you can see on the graph.

Not bad for a turboback, camgears, xede and fuel pump. I don't have a hotside. Also it appears I was loosing a little boost since my TQ curve fluctuated.



The boost was 25 psi tappering to 18 at redline

Last edited by snoop; Aug 12, 2006 at 11:58 AM.
Old Aug 11, 2006 | 05:17 PM
  #27  
jrsimon27's Avatar
Evolved Member
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Liked
Loved
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,574
Likes: 6
From: C.A Honduras!
snoop in your 91 dyno pull your afrs seem to be close to 12.0 all the way it seems thats how shiv likes it.
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 01:52 AM
  #28  
alan678's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: La Jolla, CA
Originally Posted by snoop
Something is not right here is I made more TQ without cams. I think you must have a stage1 timing since the cams are not really in picture at all. Most of the stage 1+ make around 315whp and over 300whp on the TT dyno.

On the same DYNO with a stage 1 custom tune and no SMART I made.


I have a stage 1 (SHIV Tune)

HKS Exhaust
Helix DP
UR highflow cat
Fidanza Cam Gears
Walbro Fuel pump
K&N drop in filter
NGK Iriduim plugs



Here is my Car on 109 unleaded

So here is the dyno of my results of 100 octance custom tune running 109 Unleaded. The AF sensor came off at the end as you can see on the graph.

Not bad for a turboback, camgears, xede and fuel pump. I don't have a hotside. Also it appears I was loosing a little boost since my TQ curve fluctuated.



The boost was 25 psi tappering to 18 at redline
One thing I must say again is that it was 110 Degrees in the dyno compared to your 65 & 72 degree runs...I think your car was in a more comfortable environment weather wise...Intake temps during my runs (on Evo scan) were like 100+ the whole time...

Alfred told me that I should get a test pipe and lower intercooler pipe and the car should be seeing the 320WHP area with no problems...

Also, your AFRs are pretty high too as to mine start off at 12 and safely go to 11 up on top...

On this Dyno session I only had 10 runs total for an hour of tuning...I am pretty sure with some more time and cooler temps I can squeeze some more numbers out of the car playing with the cam gear settings are trying to work out my restrictive timing...
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 01:55 AM
  #29  
alan678's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: La Jolla, CA
Originally Posted by nj1266
I agree with Jeff. There is some timing pulled from 500 to 3500 rpm. My TBE exhaust non-smart timing map that Alfred created is much less restrictive. Here it is:

One thing you gotta note when putting the car on the dyno is that the SMART feature is turned off to tune the car, then the SMART maps are tailored the cars needs after the tune is done....so that when the numbers get screwy on the tune due to a bad batch of gas or what not, the SMART kicks in and pulls timing and adds fuel as needed...

so no, SMART has nothing to do with the tune while on the dyno...
Old Aug 12, 2006 | 10:40 AM
  #30  
EvoTio's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 2
From: L.A.
I definitely agree with alan678 that the temps/conditions that he dynoed at were not the best recipe for good horsepower/torque numbers. When I dynoed at Tuning Technologies in July 2005, Shiv was able to do about 308 whp and 280 lbs tq on 91 octane with a water injection mix. With 100 octane, I was able to do about 322 whp and 285 lbs tq. This was also done on a hot day, but it cooled down to 98 degrees when I dynoed in the evening. I had a basic Stage 1 W/ S.M.A.R.T. running with a 3" cat.

Snoop, your Stage 1 dyno numbers are great. They are the highest dyno numbers I've seen on a Stage 1 so far. I'm very curious, what are your trap speeds in the 1/4 mile? I was able to trap 108 MPH in Fontana. I'm sure I could have done 110-111 MPH if my clutch wasn't locking me out of 2 of the 4 gears. I'm having a twin disk installed soon and hope to return to Fontana for another try.

Last edited by EvoTio; Aug 12, 2006 at 11:10 AM.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:08 PM.