BMW 335i Dynojet Results
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Ahem....
results from today (stock vs. xede+cat-back) 91oct:
Note: This dynojet reads 10-15whp lower than most other Dynojet. In fact, with 2wd cars, it reads within 3-5% of our Dyno Dynamics dyno!
results from today (stock vs. xede+cat-back) 91oct:
Note: This dynojet reads 10-15whp lower than most other Dynojet. In fact, with 2wd cars, it reads within 3-5% of our Dyno Dynamics dyno!
Last edited by shiv@vishnu; Sep 27, 2006 at 05:24 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by steve_evo
what kind of catback?
Shiv
holy ****....i guess all the rumors about this car being maxxed out from the factory is complete bullsh*t O_O
that is insane....but just as powerful as a IX with exhaust and flash it seems...well more torque. maybe there's even more power to be untapped?
oh and look at those curves! wow.
that is insane....but just as powerful as a IX with exhaust and flash it seems...well more torque. maybe there's even more power to be untapped?
oh and look at those curves! wow.
Evolved Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,815
Likes: 24
From: Davidson, NC
That's awesome.
Too bad it will probably get really expensive to mod from here on out.
Cams....Vanos makes that expensive and almost unnecessary
Intake....Is it going to make any power? It will probably sound cool though.
Turbo upgrade....Ow, my a*s! There's 2 of them and it's a German car so that makes them cost even more for some reason.
Shiv,
How much more power do you think there is to be had on 93 octane?
When are you going to get going on the Audi stuff? I'd really like to see what the 2.0T is capable of and the few Audi tuners there are move too slow.
Too bad it will probably get really expensive to mod from here on out.
Cams....Vanos makes that expensive and almost unnecessary
Intake....Is it going to make any power? It will probably sound cool though.
Turbo upgrade....Ow, my a*s! There's 2 of them and it's a German car so that makes them cost even more for some reason.
Shiv,
How much more power do you think there is to be had on 93 octane?
When are you going to get going on the Audi stuff? I'd really like to see what the 2.0T is capable of and the few Audi tuners there are move too slow.
Last edited by hotrod2448; Sep 27, 2006 at 06:34 PM.
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by hotrod2448
How much more power do you think there is to be had on 93 octane?
Originally Posted by shiv@vishnu
So how much power is left in there? Well, it's clear that we are limited by our 91oct gas. With every 0.5 degrees of timing I sneaked in, the car would pick up a few horsepower. So with better gas, we'll see more power. And with race gas, I'm sure we'll see big gains. But on 93 octane, I'd expect to see another 10whp.
well if u can't post the vid here could u inform us when the vid is made, so we could get it from the e90 post thread or somethin
from the e90 post:
according to ur info on e90 thread u have a 450bhp Evo....u're sayin a 335i with 330whp and 350wtq is quicker than a 450bhp Evo? i dont understand.
or did u mean the 335i at its current stage just "feels" faster due to the instant torque?
Originally Posted by dustin@vishnu
It is faster. MUCH faster. My everyday evo is basically as far as you can take an evo without bolting on a big Garrett GT turbo. Some of the mods include cams, cam gears, Xede, Full exhaust, Ohlins, the whole bit, and I can honestly say that the tuned 335 is quicker than my car. Not only does the 335 make power everywhere, but the gearing is perfect for the power output. Those two items in one package makes for a very potent street car. I think light to light it would be close with my car, just because the Evo can put down the power right off the bat. But from a roll, lights out on the evo.
or did u mean the 335i at its current stage just "feels" faster due to the instant torque?
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Originally Posted by fusionchicken
from the e90 post:
according to ur info on e90 thread u have a 450bhp Evo....u're sayin a 335i with 330whp and 350wtq is quicker than a 450bhp Evo? i dont understand.
or did u mean the 335i at its current stage just "feels" faster due to the instant torque?
according to ur info on e90 thread u have a 450bhp Evo....u're sayin a 335i with 330whp and 350wtq is quicker than a 450bhp Evo? i dont understand.
or did u mean the 335i at its current stage just "feels" faster due to the instant torque?
-shiv
Originally Posted by fusionchicken
from the e90 post:
according to ur info on e90 thread u have a 450bhp Evo....u're sayin a 335i with 330whp and 350wtq is quicker than a 450bhp Evo? i dont understand.
or did u mean the 335i at its current stage just "feels" faster due to the instant torque?
according to ur info on e90 thread u have a 450bhp Evo....u're sayin a 335i with 330whp and 350wtq is quicker than a 450bhp Evo? i dont understand.
or did u mean the 335i at its current stage just "feels" faster due to the instant torque?