Notices
Vishnu Performance - California [Visit Site]

Shiv what is the realistic limit of pump gas?

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 11:49 AM
  #31  
meisnerboy's Avatar
Evolving Member
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally posted by MP5
You bastards are ruining my thread! now what about the pump gas
Sorry. you are correct Sir.

Shiv care to fill us in on the limit of 91 and 94?
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:06 PM
  #32  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Good question. When pushing cars to their component limits, you'll start to see car-to-car variation. On our 91 octane gas, my well abused Stage 1 EVO (before camshaft upgrades), for example, only could muster 235-240whp on our DD dyno despite whatever tuning I could throw at it. I suspect this may have to do with the 3500+ dyno pulls the car has seen Whereas ALL other customer Stage 1 cars have made up to 245-255whp without much problem. On 93-94 octane, expect another 10-15whp. This, as seen at all the out-of-state tuning days, is anywhere between 310-320whp on an AWD dynojet tested in good conditions. With camshafts, expect another 25-30whp without any loss of midrange or low end torque. Maybe another 5-15whp with a good intercooler upgrade. Another 5 or so with some clever intake plumbing. Another 10 or so with a test pipe. so what does that add up to?

cheers,
shiv
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:10 PM
  #33  
2fast2Furious's Avatar
In Timeout
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Kennesaw Ga
So are you going to do a intake now? lol also how are the cams coming and if I wanted to do the 264 / 264 will you have a map for that?



Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
Good question. When pushing cars to their component limits, you'll start to see car-to-car variation. On our 91 octane gas, my well abused Stage 1 EVO (before camshaft upgrades), for example, only could muster 235-240whp on our DD dyno despite whatever tuning I could throw at it. I suspect this may have to do with the 3500+ dyno pulls the car has seen Whereas ALL other customer Stage 1 cars have made up to 245-255whp without much problem. On 93-94 octane, expect another 10-15whp. This, as seen at all the out-of-state tuning days, is anywhere between 310-320whp on an AWD dynojet tested in good conditions. With camshafts, expect another 25-30whp without any loss of midrange or low end torque. Maybe another 5-15whp with a good intercooler upgrade. Another 5 or so with some clever intake plumbing. Another 10 or so with a test pipe. so what does that add up to?

cheers,
shiv
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:17 PM
  #34  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Thread Starter
In Timeout
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
Good question. When pushing cars to their component limits, you'll start to see car-to-car variation. On our 91 octane gas, my well abused Stage 1 EVO (before camshaft upgrades), for example, only could muster 235-240whp on our DD dyno despite whatever tuning I could throw at it. I suspect this may have to do with the 3500+ dyno pulls the car has seen Whereas ALL other customer Stage 1 cars have made up to 245-255whp without much problem. On 93-94 octane, expect another 10-15whp. This, as seen at all the out-of-state tuning days, is anywhere between 310-320whp on an AWD dynojet tested in good conditions. With camshafts, expect another 25-30whp without any loss of midrange or low end torque. Maybe another 5-15whp with a good intercooler upgrade. Another 5 or so with some clever intake plumbing. Another 10 or so with a test pipe. so what does that add up to?

cheers,
shiv
Thank you shiv very close to what I thought- So there it is boys and girls you can expect 350 WHP with pump gas much more and your going to have to spend the dough on $5.25/gallon race gas
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:29 PM
  #35  
SAEVO's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
From: ..
Come on MP5, ask him when he is coming to Texas. I have my XEDE in the mail(It will be here thursday). So I guess we will both be around that magic 340-350WHP once we get the cams in.......damn I am exctited
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:30 PM
  #36  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
Good question. When pushing cars to their component limits, you'll start to see car-to-car variation. On our 91 octane gas, my well abused Stage 1 EVO (before camshaft upgrades), for example, only could muster 235-240whp on our DD dyno despite whatever tuning I could throw at it. I suspect this may have to do with the 3500+ dyno pulls the car has seen Whereas ALL other customer Stage 1 cars have made up to 245-255whp without much problem. On 93-94 octane, expect another 10-15whp. This, as seen at all the out-of-state tuning days, is anywhere between 310-320whp on an AWD dynojet tested in good conditions. With camshafts, expect another 25-30whp without any loss of midrange or low end torque. Maybe another 5-15whp with a good intercooler upgrade. Another 5 or so with some clever intake plumbing. Another 10 or so with a test pipe. so what does that add up to?

cheers,
shiv
Ah 380hp on a dynojet with 94oct.

Funny I posted that before.

Eric
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:35 PM
  #37  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Thread Starter
In Timeout
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Originally posted by SAEVO
Come on MP5, ask him when he is coming to Texas. I have my XEDE in the mail(It will be here thursday). So I guess we will both be around that magic 340-350WHP once we get the cams in.......damn I am exctited
As soon as I can get my hands on some cams (30 HP is a significant gain guys!!) and have some guys commit I will volunteer to set up the next dynoday if Bill doesnt want to. Thats a pretty stout car and should be all most of us will want with a splash of racegas will best a z06.

Last edited by MP5; Oct 31, 2003 at 01:40 PM.
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:39 PM
  #38  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Thread Starter
In Timeout
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky


Ah 380hp on a dynojet with 94oct.

Funny I posted that before.

Eric
Dont roll those eyes at me Eric Ill you


Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:40 PM
  #39  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Originally posted by MP5
Dont roll those eyes at me Eric Ill you


Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:46 PM
  #40  
shiv@vishnu's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (20)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 4,941
Likes: 0
From: Danville/Blackhawk, California
Just in case it wasn't clear (and I guess it wasn't ), the last post was sort of a joke. Mods and hp are rarely additive. That is, you can't just keep on adding the positive effects of them on top of each other. It's a popular thing to do but it rarely leads to an accurate output. I'd be pleasantly suprised if one could make 380whp on an AWD dynojet running race gas and the factory turbo. I wouldn't bet that its impossible. I just question the merit of running such a system where the injectors and turbocharger are pushed to their absolute limit.

As far as reasonable max hp on pump gas, I'd say 340-350whp (on an AWD dynojet) should be quite doable (Stage 1 with cams and perhaps a test-pipe). I'm sure more is possible if one really finds the need to push the components harder than they want to be pushed.

Cheers
shiv
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:49 PM
  #41  
MP5's Avatar
MP5
Thread Starter
In Timeout
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,750
Likes: 0
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
Just in case it wasn't clear (and I guess it wasn't ), the last post was sort of a joke. Mods and hp are rarely additive. That is, you can't just keep on adding the positive effects of them on top of each other. It's a popular thing to do but it rarely leads to an accurate output. I'd be pleasantly suprised if one could make 380whp on an AWD dynojet running race gas and the factory turbo. I wouldn't bet that its impossible. I just question the merit of running such a system where the injectors and turbocharger are pushed to their absolute limit.

As far as reasonable max hp on pump gas, I'd say 340-350whp (on an AWD dynojet) should be quite doable (Stage 1 with cams and perhaps a test-pipe). I'm sure more is possible if one really finds the need to push the components harder than they want to be pushed.

Cheers
shiv
It was Erics DA that said 380 MP5 was right on at 350 No dissappointment from me at all thats a stout car
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 01:50 PM
  #42  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Originally posted by shiv@vishnu
Just in case it wasn't clear (and I guess it wasn't ), the last post was sort of a joke. Mods and hp are rarely additive. That is, you can't just keep on adding the positive effects of them on top of each other. It's a popular thing to do but it rarely leads to an accurate output. I'd be pleasantly suprised if one could make 380whp on an AWD dynojet running race gas and the factory turbo. I wouldn't bet that its impossible. I just question the merit of running such a system where the injectors and turbocharger are pushed to their absolute limit.

As far as reasonable max hp on pump gas, I'd say 340-350whp (on an AWD dynojet) should be quite doable (Stage 1 with cams and perhaps a test-pipe). I'm sure more is possible if one really finds the need to push the components harder than they want to be pushed.

Cheers
shiv
I did not say anything about a stock turbo. All i read was total HP on pump gas. Even with a larger turbo your octain limited so just a dumb guess I would say a 2.0L on 94oct would back a max of 380whp on a dynoject just becasue I have seen this with other 4g63 from DSMs. I always hear on the 2.0l 4g63 380 is tops on pump fuel from those guys.

Eric
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 02:06 PM
  #43  
Hor's Avatar
Hor
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Eric Lyublinsky
I always hear on the 2.0l 4g63 380 is tops on pump fuel from those guys.

Eric
I already told you it is MUCH more than that, especially on 93/94 octane.
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 02:09 PM
  #44  
Hor's Avatar
Hor
Newbie
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
Originally posted by MP5
MP5 was right on at 350 No dissappointment from me at all thats a stout car
You are so brainwashed!

350 the max on pump?!?!?
Old Oct 31, 2003 | 02:09 PM
  #45  
Eric Lyublinsky's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,218
Likes: 0
From: Tri-State
Originally posted by Hor


I already told you it is MUCH more than that, especially on 93/94 octane.
Well refresh my memory. I hear this from a good GSX friend that makes 378 on pump gas with

Built motor
AEM computer
BIG TURBO.
all supporting mods.

Makes 589 on c16.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:28 AM.