Aquamist new hi-flow system for 2007
#17
Evolved Member
iTrader: (10)
the price is very reasonable! buy a injection from other manufacturer for ~$500, add a good failsafe from somewhere else for another ~$300 to $600.
Not steep at all considering the design/engineering that is put into the design of this fully integrated system. PLUS the excellent technical/customer support that comes with it.
Not steep at all considering the design/engineering that is put into the design of this fully integrated system. PLUS the excellent technical/customer support that comes with it.
#23
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The perrin system is designed to address a certain category of modified cars. It handles stock engine to modifed power output of 300-500 bhp. The unit is totally self contained, plug and play. It has a very advanced failsafe system inbuild, tracks the water flow continuously, drop boost or switch map etc.
The Aquamist HFS range is designed for power output between 300-1000BHP, this is due to the huge pump and very accurate water to fuel ratio tracking. As the flow is controlled by a PWM valve, it matched the delivery characteristics of a fuel injector perfectly.
The perrin dash display is different form the DDS3, but has all the functions pre-trimmed for users can get the system installed and working pretty quicky.
#24
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I understand your concern, unlike other add-ons, WI injectiion system can be transferred to your next car so your investment is for long term - you only need to buy it once, so pick the best one if possible.
The HFS-5 is as complete and we can make it, except for the water tank - we give you everything else.
Water tank supplier:
http://fluids.flambeau.com/
The HFS-5 is as complete and we can make it, except for the water tank - we give you everything else.
Water tank supplier:
http://fluids.flambeau.com/
#25
Evolved Member
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sleepy Hollow
Posts: 821
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is what I have been wanting...never could understand why everyone varied pump speed with a fixed orifice nozzle...Flintstones Tech 101.
I run a ChipTorque Xede and this would be perfect...the Xede has an Auxiliary injector control function built in to it...Oh, the mental woody! The ability to fully map the injector duty cycle based on boost and load. With lean-run protection nested in the mapping as well, another level of failsafe based on wideband feedback to induce a boost cut to wastegate actuator pressure if anything happens to the WI system and readings go lean.
A couple of questions though...
With this system do you also monitor "rail" pressure as this would make a good backup to flow-sensor?
Is this an "open center" injection system or a blind injection system...I mean does it circulate back to tank or is the "rail" dead headed at the injector(s)? Does the water/meth/alky heat up with being under pressure all the time if this is a blind system?
Does the pump run all the time? Or does it come on, pressurise the system, and go into stand-by wating for the proper events to trigger injection?
Filter? A trash screen to the injector would be good...Canton-Mecca makes a superb 1 micron filter with low restriction that would be good on the suction side, ensuring a clean system.
This system looks alot like what I have been kicking around in my head for the last couple of months. Outstanding! This system gets my vote when I step up to WI!
EDIT: Now that I look at the pic of the components again, I answered some of my questions...I see that the PWM valve is in line with one of the good 'ol nozzles. I would think that unless this is right next to the nozzle, you introduce a fair bit of latency to the system...I am still excited about this system, though. For me I would probably go to the length of making a one hole fuel rail (not hard at all) and using an actual fuel injector spec'd for whatever I'm injecting and the 125psi pressure. I would still like to hear from Richard L regarding some of the other questions.
I run a ChipTorque Xede and this would be perfect...the Xede has an Auxiliary injector control function built in to it...Oh, the mental woody! The ability to fully map the injector duty cycle based on boost and load. With lean-run protection nested in the mapping as well, another level of failsafe based on wideband feedback to induce a boost cut to wastegate actuator pressure if anything happens to the WI system and readings go lean.
A couple of questions though...
With this system do you also monitor "rail" pressure as this would make a good backup to flow-sensor?
Is this an "open center" injection system or a blind injection system...I mean does it circulate back to tank or is the "rail" dead headed at the injector(s)? Does the water/meth/alky heat up with being under pressure all the time if this is a blind system?
Does the pump run all the time? Or does it come on, pressurise the system, and go into stand-by wating for the proper events to trigger injection?
Filter? A trash screen to the injector would be good...Canton-Mecca makes a superb 1 micron filter with low restriction that would be good on the suction side, ensuring a clean system.
This system looks alot like what I have been kicking around in my head for the last couple of months. Outstanding! This system gets my vote when I step up to WI!
EDIT: Now that I look at the pic of the components again, I answered some of my questions...I see that the PWM valve is in line with one of the good 'ol nozzles. I would think that unless this is right next to the nozzle, you introduce a fair bit of latency to the system...I am still excited about this system, though. For me I would probably go to the length of making a one hole fuel rail (not hard at all) and using an actual fuel injector spec'd for whatever I'm injecting and the 125psi pressure. I would still like to hear from Richard L regarding some of the other questions.
Last edited by WhiteEvo05; Jan 9, 2007 at 07:19 AM.
#26
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We put a small accumulator on the output port to store some pressurised water and at the same time, smoothing out the pressure peaks caused by the diaphragm's pumping action.
The pump is not running full time, it only run during injection. User determines when the system should start by trimming the trigger point, from signal of a MAP sensor, TPS or Fuel duty cycle %. The system can read any 0-5V "load" sensor.
In order to minimise the slow pressure ramp up of the pump, we allow a small delay after an injection event, This allows the accumulator be charged up, ready for the next injection event.
#27
EvoM Guru
iTrader: (50)
Yes. The water pump has three internal bypass valves, placed between the inlet and outlet port. The valves begin to open at 125psi, holding the pressure steady. Depending on the inlet hose bore, the pressure can creep beyond 125psi during dead head conditions.
We put a small accumulator on the output port to store some pressurised water and at the same time, smoothing out the pressure peaks caused by the diaphragm's pumping action.
The pump is not running full time, it only run during injection. User determines when the system should start by trimming the trigger point, from signal of a MAP sensor, TPS or Fuel duty cycle %. The system can read any 0-5V "load" sensor.
In order to minimise the slow pressure ramp up of the pump, we allow a small delay after an injection event, This allows the accumulator be charged up, ready for the next injection event.
We put a small accumulator on the output port to store some pressurised water and at the same time, smoothing out the pressure peaks caused by the diaphragm's pumping action.
The pump is not running full time, it only run during injection. User determines when the system should start by trimming the trigger point, from signal of a MAP sensor, TPS or Fuel duty cycle %. The system can read any 0-5V "load" sensor.
In order to minimise the slow pressure ramp up of the pump, we allow a small delay after an injection event, This allows the accumulator be charged up, ready for the next injection event.
#28
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The aquamist mirrors the injector duty cycle at a ratio of 1:1.
It only follow only one of the four inejctors. On paper, it would appear top be a problem of gaps between pulses. In practice, the range of droplet sizes from the aquamist nozzle (40um to 80um) travels towards the TP, will accelerate at different rates, by the time it enters the manifold, it will become a continuous train of water droplets. If you are concerning about uneven cylinder distribution, put two jets at 6" apart, it will make the distribution even better.
Every fuel injection sequantial or single point, will cover a duty cycle of 0-100%. Although I mention the duty cyle ratio is 1:1 , but the flow ratio will be water jet size/4x fuel injector size.
It only follow only one of the four inejctors. On paper, it would appear top be a problem of gaps between pulses. In practice, the range of droplet sizes from the aquamist nozzle (40um to 80um) travels towards the TP, will accelerate at different rates, by the time it enters the manifold, it will become a continuous train of water droplets. If you are concerning about uneven cylinder distribution, put two jets at 6" apart, it will make the distribution even better.
Every fuel injection sequantial or single point, will cover a duty cycle of 0-100%. Although I mention the duty cyle ratio is 1:1 , but the flow ratio will be water jet size/4x fuel injector size.
#30
Former Sponsor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: England
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is what I have been wanting...never could understand why everyone varied pump speed with a fixed orifice nozzle...Flintstones Tech 101.
I run a ChipTorque Xede and this would be perfect...the Xede has an Auxiliary injector control function built in to it...Oh, the mental woody! The ability to fully map the injector duty cycle based on boost and load. With lean-run protection nested in the mapping as well, another level of failsafe based on wideband feedback to induce a boost cut to wastegate actuator pressure if anything happens to the WI system and readings go lean.
A couple of questions though...
With this system do you also monitor "rail" pressure as this would make a good backup to flow-sensor?
I run a ChipTorque Xede and this would be perfect...the Xede has an Auxiliary injector control function built in to it...Oh, the mental woody! The ability to fully map the injector duty cycle based on boost and load. With lean-run protection nested in the mapping as well, another level of failsafe based on wideband feedback to induce a boost cut to wastegate actuator pressure if anything happens to the WI system and readings go lean.
A couple of questions though...
With this system do you also monitor "rail" pressure as this would make a good backup to flow-sensor?
We can make a feed back loop using the flow sensor vs IDC but at present, we don't want to make the system too complicated. It is definately a very good point you raised.
EDIT: Now that I look at the pic of the components again, I answered some of my questions...I see that the PWM valve is in line with one of the good 'ol nozzles. I would think that unless this is right next to the nozzle, you introduce a fair bit of latency to the system...I am still excited about this system, though. For me I would probably go to the length of making a one hole fuel rail (not hard at all) and using an actual fuel injector spec'd for whatever I'm injecting and the 125psi pressure. I would still like to hear from Richard L regarding some of the other questions.
It will be good to extend this system to port injection as well and inlet tract injection, so you get good charge air cooling as well as very even in-cylinder cooling
Last edited by Richard L; Jan 9, 2007 at 05:35 PM.