New AEM kit or Snow 2D kit?
New AEM kit or Snow 2D kit?
I'm looking at getting either the new AEM unit, or the Stage 2D Snow kit.
I'm new to meth, but can anyone make any recommendations on these two kits?
Obviously the AEM is brand new, but would it be worth the risk trying it out? Or should I stick to the tried and trusted Snow kit that's already been proven?
Either way, everyone's input would be greatly appreciated as I'm wanting to purchase a kit ASAP
I'm new to meth, but can anyone make any recommendations on these two kits?
Obviously the AEM is brand new, but would it be worth the risk trying it out? Or should I stick to the tried and trusted Snow kit that's already been proven?
Either way, everyone's input would be greatly appreciated as I'm wanting to purchase a kit ASAP
there is really no advantage going with a 2D system and are impossible to tune right....
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=290756
take a few minutes to read thru the thread, especially the last few post in there
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=290756
take a few minutes to read thru the thread, especially the last few post in there
Originally Posted by SlowCar
there is really no advantage going with a 2D system and are impossible to tune right....
I'm speaking from personal experience of course. If that's the case for you as well, then I retract my statement. But if you're just parroting something you've heard or read, then I think you're out of place for posting that.
I'm sorry Abner but I'm going to have to disagree with the part of your statement highlighted in bold above. Tuning a 2D system is far from impossible and quite frankly, there's nothing difficult about it if you know what you're doing.
I'm speaking from personal experience of course. If that's the case for you as well, then I retract my statement. But if you're just parroting something you've heard or read, then I think you're out of place for posting that.
I'm speaking from personal experience of course. If that's the case for you as well, then I retract my statement. But if you're just parroting something you've heard or read, then I think you're out of place for posting that.
can you tell me what is the settings on your controller box?
if you got data logging capability, could you post datalogs of AFR/boost vs. RPM - ~3000rpm thru redline WOT, 1st thru 5th/6th.
Last edited by SlowCar; Aug 29, 2007 at 12:55 AM.
The settings on my SMC controller were as such.
Start spray point= 11-12psi
Full spray= 17-18psi
Here are some screen shots of a log from my visit to the drag strip back in November of '06. This was ran with the stock turbo on 93oct and 100% meth injection. Boost peaked anywhere from 25-28psi and fell to 22psi just after 7k rpm. I ran an 11.9@117mph this pass fyi.
DSMLink EMS Legend
AEM35Bar= 3.5 bar MAP sensor
TEWBLin= wbo2
1st Gear: 4700rpm, 28psi, 11.5:1

2nd Gear: 5800rpm, 24.7psi, 11.6:1

3rd Gear: 5900rpm, 25psi, 11.6:1

4th Gear: 5600rpm, 26psi, 11.6:1

4th Gear: 6600rpm, 23psi, 11.4:1

4th Gear: 7200rpm, 22psi, 11.5:1

The AFR varied between 11.4-11.6 at wot throughout the entire run. The only exception was the spike to 11.9 in first gear when I lost traction for a split second. I had no difficulty what so ever tuning this in regards to running a progressive pump system.
Start spray point= 11-12psi
Full spray= 17-18psi
Here are some screen shots of a log from my visit to the drag strip back in November of '06. This was ran with the stock turbo on 93oct and 100% meth injection. Boost peaked anywhere from 25-28psi and fell to 22psi just after 7k rpm. I ran an 11.9@117mph this pass fyi.
DSMLink EMS Legend
AEM35Bar= 3.5 bar MAP sensor
TEWBLin= wbo2
1st Gear: 4700rpm, 28psi, 11.5:1

2nd Gear: 5800rpm, 24.7psi, 11.6:1

3rd Gear: 5900rpm, 25psi, 11.6:1

4th Gear: 5600rpm, 26psi, 11.6:1

4th Gear: 6600rpm, 23psi, 11.4:1

4th Gear: 7200rpm, 22psi, 11.5:1

The AFR varied between 11.4-11.6 at wot throughout the entire run. The only exception was the spike to 11.9 in first gear when I lost traction for a split second. I had no difficulty what so ever tuning this in regards to running a progressive pump system.
there is really no advantage going with a 2D system and are impossible to tune right....
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=290756
take a few minutes to read thru the thread, especially the last few post in there
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/sh...d.php?t=290756
take a few minutes to read thru the thread, especially the last few post in there
I want the Aquamist, but I don't think there are any left at the $495 price
The settings on my SMC controller were as such.
Start spray point= 11-12psi
Full spray= 17-18psi
Here are some screen shots of a log from my visit to the drag strip back in November of '06. This was ran with the stock turbo on 93oct and 100% meth injection. Boost peaked anywhere from 25-28psi and fell to 22psi just after 7k rpm. I ran an 11.9@117mph this pass fyi.
.
.
.
The AFR varied between 11.4-11.6 at wot throughout the entire run. The only exception was the spike to 11.9 in first gear when I lost traction for a split second. I had no difficulty what so ever tuning this in regards to running a progressive pump system.
Start spray point= 11-12psi
Full spray= 17-18psi
Here are some screen shots of a log from my visit to the drag strip back in November of '06. This was ran with the stock turbo on 93oct and 100% meth injection. Boost peaked anywhere from 25-28psi and fell to 22psi just after 7k rpm. I ran an 11.9@117mph this pass fyi.
.
.
.
The AFR varied between 11.4-11.6 at wot throughout the entire run. The only exception was the spike to 11.9 in first gear when I lost traction for a split second. I had no difficulty what so ever tuning this in regards to running a progressive pump system.
If it is at all possible, logging the AFR from low RPM of 1500 on forth/ffith gear would be interesting too. The plots appeared to be all at WOT.
Trending Topics
hman, could you have mistaken this data log for something else? These logs are lacking the "tell tale" symptom of a meth injected car...symptoms that cannot be tuned out unless you run a very specific setup.
Originally Posted by Richard L
You did a find job on tuning the SMC PPS system. I have a few questions if I may. What size jet are you using?
If it is at all possible, logging the AFR from low RPM of 1500 on forth/ffith gear would be interesting too. The plots appeared to be all at WOT.
If it is at all possible, logging the AFR from low RPM of 1500 on forth/ffith gear would be interesting too. The plots appeared to be all at WOT.
Unfortunately I have sold off my meth injection system and have plans to put the car up for sale in the coming weeks. I don't have any logs starting at 1500 in any gear anyway. I would always start around 3k right before spool up. I could maybe dig up a 3rd gear pull starting in the 3k range to redline if you want.
Originally Posted by SlowCar
hman, could you have mistaken this data log for something else? These logs are lacking the "tell tale" symptom of a meth injected car...symptoms that cannot be tuned out unless you run a very specific setup.


What are the "tell tale" symptoms you're looking for or expecting?
11.9@117 ran on 11-12-2006
Last edited by HmanEVO; Sep 11, 2007 at 08:28 AM.
Here is a link to a pic from my 50 trim thread. I do not have any pics showing the engine bay back when I was running the stock turbo in case you were wondering. You can clearly see the SMC nozzle assembly mounted to the uicp. I did not run a solenoid valve. I ran the check valve that comes with the SMC kit.
Engine bay pic
http://media.putfile.com/lag-20-33
you are missing all the "rich dips" when shifting/boost drops...especially when you let off at the end of the run
those 2 nozzles combined in vid = a M10...a lot of meth being sprayed
you are missing all the "rich dips" when shifting/boost drops...especially when you let off at the end of the run
those 2 nozzles combined in vid = a M10...a lot of meth being sprayed
http://media.putfile.com/lag-20-33
you are missing all the "rich dips" when shifting/boost drops...especially when you let off at the end of the run
those 2 nozzles combined in vid = a M10...a lot of meth being sprayed

you are missing all the "rich dips" when shifting/boost drops...especially when you let off at the end of the run
those 2 nozzles combined in vid = a M10...a lot of meth being sprayed

The screen shots of the log in my above post do have the afr rich dip at the end of the run. It just isn't shown in the screen capture. Here is a shot of the end of that same run showing the afr dip rich due to running a check valve. 
The reason there were no rich dips between shifts is because I was using DSMLinks no-lift-to-shift feature. TPS was 100% until the finish(throttle floored the entire run). This kept boost above ~15psi during shifts. Under normal shifting, I would get roughly a .5-.7 dip in AFR as boost came back up after a shift. Then AFR would quickly level out at my target value.
The rich dip at the end of a run could easily be solved by running a solenoid valve at the nozzle triggered to open and close off a boost value.
As for the rich dip between shifts, this is where I agree with the first part of your original statement. This is possibly a disadvantage of a PP system. Although the car doesn't stumble/bog and the AFR doesn't go rich enough for me to be concerned about. I would assume a system using a HSV triggered off IDC%'s would be more effective in eliminating this.
Well all you had to do was be specific in your question so I knew what you were getting at.
The screen shots of the log in my above post do have the afr rich dip at the end of the run. It just isn't shown in the screen capture. Here is a shot of the end of that same run showing the afr dip rich due to running a check valve.

The reason there were no rich dips between shifts is because I was using DSMLinks no-lift-to-shift feature. TPS was 100% until the finish(throttle floored the entire run). This kept boost above ~15psi during shifts. Under normal shifting, I would get roughly a .5-.7 dip in AFR as boost came back up after a shift. Then AFR would quickly level out at my target value.
The rich dip at the end of a run could easily be solved by running a solenoid valve at the nozzle triggered to open and close off a boost value.
As for the rich dip between shifts, this is where I agree with the first part of your original statement. This is possibly a disadvantage of a PP system. Although the car doesn't stumble/bog and the AFR doesn't go rich enough for me to be concerned about. I would assume a system using a HSV triggered off IDC%'s would be more effective in eliminating this.
The screen shots of the log in my above post do have the afr rich dip at the end of the run. It just isn't shown in the screen capture. Here is a shot of the end of that same run showing the afr dip rich due to running a check valve. 
The reason there were no rich dips between shifts is because I was using DSMLinks no-lift-to-shift feature. TPS was 100% until the finish(throttle floored the entire run). This kept boost above ~15psi during shifts. Under normal shifting, I would get roughly a .5-.7 dip in AFR as boost came back up after a shift. Then AFR would quickly level out at my target value.
The rich dip at the end of a run could easily be solved by running a solenoid valve at the nozzle triggered to open and close off a boost value.
As for the rich dip between shifts, this is where I agree with the first part of your original statement. This is possibly a disadvantage of a PP system. Although the car doesn't stumble/bog and the AFR doesn't go rich enough for me to be concerned about. I would assume a system using a HSV triggered off IDC%'s would be more effective in eliminating this.


