Notices
West Region Includes AZ, CA, HI, NV, UT.

San Diego Evo's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 17, 2008 | 02:24 PM
  #3976  
alan678's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: La Jolla, CA
An interesting thing about the boost plot is how the baseline pull made full boost around 2.8k rpms....that's unheard of....was that pull done in 5th gear? Also looks like the pull was started at around 1.5k rpms....Seems like the dyno was loaded pretty heavy to make it boost like that....something just not right....

The final 91oct boost plots looks normal along with the E-85 pull....and they were both started at a reasonable rpm...
Reply
Old Aug 18, 2008 | 12:11 AM
  #3977  
SLVRNBLK's Avatar
Evolved Member
Veteran: ArmyFCOTM Winner
iTrader: (169)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,078
Likes: 51
From: Tampa, FL
What seating area?
Plaza level on the Raiders side line.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:33 PM
  #3978  
mdsevo06's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by alan678
An interesting thing about the boost plot is how the baseline pull made full boost around 2.8k rpms....that's unheard of....was that pull done in 5th gear? Also looks like the pull was started at around 1.5k rpms....Seems like the dyno was loaded pretty heavy to make it boost like that....something just not right....

The final 91oct boost plots looks normal along with the E-85 pull....and they were both started at a reasonable rpm...
It dose look like a 5th gear pull. Notice on TQ, HP and PSI, the line comes back to the left, instead of continuing to the right. The TQ is vertical, like climbing K2
Was Robert sitting in the back seat?
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #3979  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by mdsevo06
It dose look like a 5th gear pull. Notice on TQ, HP and PSI, the line comes back to the left, instead of continuing to the right. The TQ is vertical, like climbing K2
Was Robert sitting in the back seat?
Here is Scot's explanation as to what happened:

"The baseline run was setup for ECUBoost, and it was running crazy high boost. I immediately changed him to a MBC and that solved his boost problems. The second run just reflects a much more sane boost level on 91. Load shouldn't have any impact on the maximum boost level reached, if the boost controller is actually controlling the boost properly. The boost came on sooner because the boost was set so crazy high, so it spiked up a lot more in the low RPM range on its way to 26psi.

The dyno load is actually higher on the subsequent runs in an effort to make sure the car was happy doing long runs in our hot SoCal weather. The Baseline was done with a 12 second sweep from 2500-7500 rpm. After I retuned it and installed the MBC, I tested it with 22 second sweeps to make sure there was no knock.

Normally I do 3 pulls for the baseline, but it was audibly pinging and with the boost hitting over 26psi on 91 I was real scared to do more pulls."
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 02:13 PM
  #3980  
mdsevo06's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Originally Posted by sEvoIXnTurboS2k
Here is Scot's explanation as to what happened:

"The baseline run was setup for ECUBoost, and it was running crazy high boost. I immediately changed him to a MBC and that solved his boost problems. The second run just reflects a much more sane boost level on 91. Load shouldn't have any impact on the maximum boost level reached, if the boost controller is actually controlling the boost properly. The boost came on sooner because the boost was set so crazy high, so it spiked up a lot more in the low RPM range on its way to 26psi.

The dyno load is actually higher on the subsequent runs in an effort to make sure the car was happy doing long runs in our hot SoCal weather. The Baseline was done with a 12 second sweep from 2500-7500 rpm. After I retuned it and installed the MBC, I tested it with 22 second sweeps to make sure there was no knock.

Normally I do 3 pulls for the baseline, but it was audibly pinging and with the boost hitting over 26psi on 91 I was real scared to do more pulls."
This part I question. Load has everything to do with boost spike, which is usually your maximum boost level. The beauty of a GM is it's ability to hold (less tapper) PSI accross and not tapper. MBC are well known for tapper and is why all the kook kids are using GM
Justin, not trying to instigate anything between RRE (Scot Grey) and Reese and Alan, but you have to take what every shop says with a grain of salt. My first tune with Scot, had me over 12.0 AFR at WOT in 3rd and had mad knock. This was before Alan even touched anything, just logged the first run. Boost leak test was performed before Scot's tune and Alan's tune, with no other chages made. I've also had bad idle issues after Scot touched the BISS screw which is a big no no. Know this was back when RRE did not have a dyno, and you had to road tune and Scot never used a WB, which explains the high AFR.
Do you plan on staying with the MBC or go back to ECU boost control?
In the end, how do's she feel?

Last edited by mdsevo06; Aug 19, 2008 at 02:26 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 02:43 PM
  #3981  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by mdsevo06
Do you plan on staying with the MBC or go back to ECU boost control?

In the end, how do's she feel?
I will be sticking with the MBC. Most high-powered Evos I've seen from BR are running MBC.

The car feels better than ever. Driveability is perfect (like stock) and the power is pretty insane for a stock turbo (probably one of the highest, if not the highest, in SoCal).

Last edited by 1QYK9; Aug 19, 2008 at 03:45 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 04:17 PM
  #3982  
4cefed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Northern Iraq
i think BR has switch most of there cars over to to the gm because it allows the aem to control the boost which is better for fine tuning, climate and elevation changes.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 04:59 PM
  #3983  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by 4cefed
i think BR has switch most of there cars over to to the gm because it allows the aem to control the boost which is better for fine tuning, climate and elevation changes.
That could be...I don't know for sure. I've read several threads on this forum where high-powered Evos were using a MBC.

Our GM solenoid is still "partially" connected and I will leave it that way until I get some more definitive answers.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #3984  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
I sent a PM to David Buschur explaining to him that I am on my third boost controller and am tired of wasting money on something as stupid as a boost controller (don't get me wrong, a boost controller is very important!). He actually took the time to respond to my PM (I figured he'd simply delete it) and stated the following:

"I wouldn't use any of those[Hallman or Dejon Tools], we didn't build them. haha

I use/recommend manual controllers. We have what I think is the best one on the market but I am sure one of the ones you have will work too.

David"

With that said, I feel pretty comfortable with the decision to go back to a MBC. I take Mr. Evo's word as gospel.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2008 | 07:02 AM
  #3985  
mdsevo06's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
MBC are more then fine, as long as you don't touch them or clean them and have to reset them to the original setting. If your already logging, then this shouldn't be an issue.
Reply
Old Aug 21, 2008 | 05:13 PM
  #3986  
brokenRS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Evolved Member
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 778
Likes: 1
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by sEvoIXnTurboS2k
Project S2000 is over. I am completely parting the car out to the bone. I still owe a lot of money on the car note, but once I pay it off I am going to get a Vette. For now the Evo is getting the love.
wahh, damn. s2k to a vette, thats consider a trader haha im kiddin
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 10:38 AM
  #3987  
alan678's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: La Jolla, CA
Qualcomm tonight...woot woot! I will be there....racing
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #3988  
1QYK9's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by alan678
Qualcomm tonight...woot woot! I will be there....racing
Good luck! I am expecting to see some high 6s!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #3989  
alan678's Avatar
Evolved Member
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,235
Likes: 1
From: La Jolla, CA
Originally Posted by sEvoIXnTurboS2k
Good luck! I am expecting to see some high 6s!
Not on pump gas...lol!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2008 | 10:46 AM
  #3990  
4cefed's Avatar
Evolving Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Northern Iraq
Jesus Alan every time i see your signature your numbers get higher!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:37 AM.