Las Vegas Evo's
Originally Posted by DynoFlash
I would really like the opportunity when I am out there to sit down with one of the gentlemen who is using a SAFC as their tuning method and show them some data logs from their car on how it is running on the road after some use with 91 octane gas.
There really is no comparision to a properly set up reflash and a SAFC.
In any event - if anyone needs my services during this week I am available, thanks
There really is no comparision to a properly set up reflash and a SAFC.
In any event - if anyone needs my services during this week I am available, thanks
also, the plan wit the safc is to get it done on a mustang dyno wit the proper load adjustment. so the tuned should be very similiar to a road tune but wit the ability to see the power bein made
Originally Posted by gonzo
Being hungover sucks... 

ONCE AGAIN THANK U COREY FOR INVITING US OUT THERE. LETS START PLANNING FOR ANOTHER TRIP
Originally Posted by LostSoul Evo
heres the thing. some of the vegas evos have been road tuned and dynoflashed by u. and there cars ran like sh*t and their 1/4 mile times didnt improve at all. so a properly set-up flash vs. a properly set up safc, the clear winner so far has been the safc. now if u do some tuning on a dyno so when can actually see the power being made on ur cars. other than bein tricked by a flash that just give more torque with power falling off right after. then u might get a lot of business out of the LV Evos. if u seen the list their is at least 5-7 evos looking for a tune. but tryin to change our minds to go reflash not gonna be easy. we seen low 12's wit a safc tuned evo and good power bein made by it too.
also, the plan wit the safc is to get it done on a mustang dyno wit the proper load adjustment. so the tuned should be very similiar to a road tune but wit the ability to see the power bein made
also, the plan wit the safc is to get it done on a mustang dyno wit the proper load adjustment. so the tuned should be very similiar to a road tune but wit the ability to see the power bein made
actually the time was 11.56 @ 124.44
the time slip looked like this.
r/t ... .418
60ft 1.775
330 4.980
1/8 ... 7.555
mph ... 96.29
1000ft ... 9.741
1/4 ... 11.562
mph ... 124.44
the question is did Justin run this time or James, because if Justin ran then it wouldn't count as a mid 11 sec. car, Right?
the time slip looked like this.
r/t ... .418
60ft 1.775
330 4.980
1/8 ... 7.555
mph ... 96.29
1000ft ... 9.741
1/4 ... 11.562
mph ... 124.44
the question is did Justin run this time or James, because if Justin ran then it wouldn't count as a mid 11 sec. car, Right?
Originally Posted by trevotec
actually the time was 11.56 @ 124.44
the time slip looked like this.
r/t ... .418
60ft 1.775
330 4.980
1/8 ... 7.555
mph ... 96.29
1000ft ... 9.741
1/4 ... 11.562
mph ... 124.44
the question is did Justin run this time or James, because if Justin ran then it wouldn't count as a mid 11 sec. car, Right?
the time slip looked like this.
r/t ... .418
60ft 1.775
330 4.980
1/8 ... 7.555
mph ... 96.29
1000ft ... 9.741
1/4 ... 11.562
mph ... 124.44
the question is did Justin run this time or James, because if Justin ran then it wouldn't count as a mid 11 sec. car, Right?
me and manny would have posted it up last night. but we went to the illegals... by the way james, george wants a rematch tonight. he says his "clutch was slipping last time you guys raced" dont worry this time we will have a better camera to film it with











