more boost control tables found
May 4, 2009, 09:13 PM
#61
Just added in the new tables for 0014/0015 and in the max upward, the right column wasn't visible and was nothing but about two dots. I have just installed the boost mods and haven't utilized them yet, but had to change the endian to big in the copied over values for my setup.
I had to go back and change the OffsetWGDC endian to little, while leaving the other 3 alone, in order for the right column to show up..
I had to go back and change the OffsetWGDC endian to little, while leaving the other 3 alone, in order for the right column to show up..
All endians either need to be big or little depending on your ECUFlash version. The address for the right column is wrong in the patch for the 94170015 rom. The correct address for the offsetWGDC is 4478.
May 4, 2009, 09:29 PM
#62
Evolved Member
iTrader: (38)
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
For 94170014/15: the scaling is wrong. It should read:
<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="4478" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost">
<table name="TPS" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
</table>
<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="4478" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost">
<table name="TPS" address="69d8" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/>
</table>
Nov 16, 2009, 09:20 PM
#64
Im trying to add these tables to 96420011 but got a couple problems
On the "max total upward" I cant find the right address and/or scaling for TPS (left side).
Now on the max wgdc vs coolant temp, both sides are wrong.
here is the .xml data Im using.
On the "max total upward" I cant find the right address and/or scaling for TPS (left side).
Now on the max wgdc vs coolant temp, both sides are wrong.
here is the .xml data Im using.
Code:
<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="4478" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost"> <table name="TPS" address="6b3a" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/> </table> <table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="56d2" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty"> <table name="Coolant Temp" address="5eae" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/> </table>
Nov 17, 2009, 09:56 PM
#66
Im trying to add these tables to 96420011 but got a couple problems
On the "max total upward" I cant find the right address and/or scaling for TPS (left side).
Now on the max wgdc vs coolant temp, both sides are wrong.
here is the .xml data Im using.
On the "max total upward" I cant find the right address and/or scaling for TPS (left side).
Now on the max wgdc vs coolant temp, both sides are wrong.
here is the .xml data Im using.
Code:
<table name="Max Total Upward WGDC Correction vs TPS" category="Turbo" address="4478" type="2D" level="1" scaling="DynamicBoost"> <table name="TPS" address="6b3a" type="Y Axis" elements="9" scaling="ThrottlePercentage"/> </table> <table name="Max WGDC vs Coolant Temp" category="Turbo" address="56d2" type="2D" level="1" scaling="WGDuty"> <table name="Coolant Temp" address="5eae" type="Y Axis" elements="8" scaling="Temp"/> </table>
Sep 16, 2010, 02:33 PM
#70
Hello
so if my max total upward wgdc corr vs tps table set to 0 than my Boost error correction table can not work if the boost is lower as the desired ? For example If I set max upward at 100% tps to 5% , in the boost error corr table -2.4psi I have 6% and my boost error psi -2.4 than the ecu can raise the wgdc by 5% only ?
so if my max total upward wgdc corr vs tps table set to 0 than my Boost error correction table can not work if the boost is lower as the desired ? For example If I set max upward at 100% tps to 5% , in the boost error corr table -2.4psi I have 6% and my boost error psi -2.4 than the ecu can raise the wgdc by 5% only ?
Sep 16, 2010, 02:57 PM
#71
Hello
so if my max total upward wgdc corr vs tps table set to 0 than my Boost error correction table can not work if the boost is lower as the desired ? For example If I set max upward at 100% tps to 5% , in the boost error corr table -2.4psi I have 6% and my boost error psi -2.4 than the ecu can raise the wgdc by 5% only ?
so if my max total upward wgdc corr vs tps table set to 0 than my Boost error correction table can not work if the boost is lower as the desired ? For example If I set max upward at 100% tps to 5% , in the boost error corr table -2.4psi I have 6% and my boost error psi -2.4 than the ecu can raise the wgdc by 5% only ?
thank you
May 1, 2013, 08:39 PM
#73
Evolving Member
I have read through this and thought I had it nailed.
Set the BWGDC to what I thought was about right and added values in the Total Upward WGDC Correction vs. TPS but only over 62.4% TPS. I thought that this would mean no WGDC upward error correction until TPS was over 62%...
But I have found that WGDC is inline with the BWGDC table at high loads and increases in line with the Total Upward WGDC Correction vs. TPS but is way above WGDC at low loads.
I would expect that the WGDC would be the close to the BWGDC at low loads and below the TPS where upward correction should occur...
I will do some more logging and check but it looked odd...
Set the BWGDC to what I thought was about right and added values in the Total Upward WGDC Correction vs. TPS but only over 62.4% TPS. I thought that this would mean no WGDC upward error correction until TPS was over 62%...
But I have found that WGDC is inline with the BWGDC table at high loads and increases in line with the Total Upward WGDC Correction vs. TPS but is way above WGDC at low loads.
I would expect that the WGDC would be the close to the BWGDC at low loads and below the TPS where upward correction should occur...
I will do some more logging and check but it looked odd...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
